Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Bloomberg Confirms Apple is Testing iPhones With USB-C Ports
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It’s not the cable that’s the problem. It’s the port.
Not the ports. It’s been my experience that if you use a lightning cable a lot you replace the cable cause it goes bad. The part that goes bad in usb c is the port. The port is much more of a hassle to replace than a cable.
If they’re gonna do usbc make it thunderbolt 4
It does sound tight, but services out there are hitting those price points. Look at pCloud for example.
No egress fees.
2tb is $8/mo (https://www.pcloud.com/cloud-storage-pricing-plans.html?period=year)
or you can buy a lifetime of 2tb storage for $350 (breakeven around 3.5yrs).
Apple/Google/Dropbox/MS/etc though are all in the similar price range, and this data is a commodity type service.
What probably would make more sense for most of these companies is to offer a larger suite of features including the backup services to increase price but add value. MS 365 for example does this since you can get OneDrive + the entire Office Suite for $100/yr for 6 years, and it regularly goes on sale for only $40/yr ($3 per month).
In short I'm trying to say that these service CAN be had at those prices. This isn't expensive compute or machine learning. This is just storage & transfer which continues to get cheaper and cheaper, esp with CDNs, cloudflare sharing, etc. Unfortunately Apple and Google don't usually run deals, and those services would be more tightly coupled with their ecosystems.
If the EU makes USB-C mandatory, it's inevitable. Aside from the box of accumulated lightning cables I won't need, this is fine; I mostly charge my phone wirelessly anyway. If they make the switch on the phones, I'll be down to an old iPad Mini and AirPods that I'll still need lightning for.
I mentioned in another post, Apple use a metal frame that holds the pads on their USB-C ports. Other phone and laptop manufacturers use plastic that can break off or become loose (just like micro USB ones did)
Durability on the Apple USB-C ports should be almost the same as lightning.
Apple makes a Phone that shoots video in ProRes and the only viable way to transfer those files is through a USB 2.0 port.
Their USB 3.0 deployment on lightning was only for acting as the host (the old iPad Pro).
That's what I call innovation.
Their USB 3.0 deployment on lightning was only for acting as the host (the old iPad Pro).
That's what I call innovation.
Since Mag Safe arrived, my last 2-3 phones have never had a cable plugged into them. But my phone gets light use. LOL
Yep. It absolutely should have happened years ago. The "Pro" model iPhones should have switched to USB-C for sure when the iPad Pro did. It's just better for everyone if it switches. That said, Lightning is actually not a bad port -- it was Apple's design submission to the USB Consortium before type-C was finalized as the rugged, non-directional USB connector. It's technically capable of everything type-C can do... Which also begs the question of why Apple has not upgraded Lightning port and cable specs to keep pace with type-C on USB 3.x and newer interfaces. I suppose the reasoning is that they always knew they would obsolete it in favor of the new standard connector. But of course they had to milk Lightning for all they could first.
My kids aren't generally gentle with their electronics. From their Nintendo switch to their xbox controllers, they use USBC for all of them. One switch gets docked dozens of times a week I would say, and it's the launch day unit. No issues. Meanwhile, a lightning cables lasts me... 12-18 months (I don't actually know anymore, I use Qi as often as I can because I got tired of replacement cable)? Anecdotal, I know.
Are the USB C ports found on MacBooks and iPads a common failure point? Genuine question here. If they are much more prone to fail than the lightning port, it's a biut surprising they ever put them on iPads, or even MacBooks, for that matter.
EDIT: Asking because the discussion seems to have evolved into a matter of which port is superior in terms of durability.
Are the USB C ports found on MacBooks and iPads a common failure point? Genuine question here. If they are much more prone to fail than the lightning port, it's a biut surprising they ever put them on iPads, or even MacBooks, for that matter.
EDIT: Asking because the discussion seems to have evolved into a matter of which port is superior in terms of durability.
Last edited:
Bad eyesight ADD, and ipad keyboard hates me somtimes sorry about that, If U remember I'll edit tomorrow
It's also thicker than lightning, and I can't for the life of me see why governments should be telling computer manufacturers what kind of connectors they have to use.
I find it interesting to hear people complain about either USB C or Lightning's durability. Both have always been very firm in the connections, and I've never had a problem (been using a USB C phone since 2015) with either.
Apple's cords themselves are horrible, but the port is perfectly fine for durability.
Apple's cords themselves are horrible, but the port is perfectly fine for durability.
negative externalities (waste primarily in this case) often require government regulation
One of the points of regulation is to make things happen which don't otherwise happen in the free market by itself though.