I have a BMW and refuse to pay a subscription to access something like this. I shouldn't have to pay a subscription when I've already paid the sticker price. On expensive cars, everything should be included as a one time payment.what other reason? like you not being able to afford a BMW in the first place? if you're not the target market, who cares?
BMW must need more $$ since they are obviously not making enough on the price of their new cars.
My 2018 Nissan Leaf has CarPlay without a subscription payment, and whether car manufacturers offer it is a huge determining factor when I consider new (or used) cars. I bought a used 2010 Nissan truck last year, and since it didn't come with CarPlay, we opted for the alpine ilx-107 aftermarket unit and love it. (it is wireless!) I think BMW is going to hear a lot of backlash from it's customer base over this issue. But hey, if you had told me 15 years ago people would pay a monthly fee to listen to music, I would have called you crazy.
LOL so the determining factor in spending 40K+ on a car is an $80 a year fee?
The numbers don't really bear this out. Without exception, BMW's unit sales (and profit) have increased YoY every year for the past 5 years. Try again.This is exactly why people who buy BMWs are switching to premium Japanese and US. It is also why companies like Tesla are able to gain traction in the competitive auto space.
i have a BMW, and realize that if i am in a position to own a BMW, 80 bucks a year vs. 300 one time purchase doesn't make a difference to me.I have a BMW and refuse to pay a subscription to access something like this. I shouldn't have to pay a subscription when I've already paid the sticker price. On expensive cars, everything should be included as a one time payment.
LOL right?? "this is why...." is it? cause i went from a Honda to a BMW - last month.The numbers don't really bear this out. Without exception, BMW's unit sales (and profit) have increased YoY every year for the past 5 years. Try again.
I AM in the market that BMW is aiming for. For me, to pay for something that other folks give away for free can influence my decision. But it wont be the only thing that makes the determination. Here is a partial list of brands offering carplay: "Apple's list of CarPlay-enabled vehicles includes over a hundred 2016 and 2017 models from 21 auto manufacturers, including Audi, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Citroën, DS Automobiles, Ferrari, Ford, GMC, Honda, Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Opel, Porsche, Peugeot, Seat, Škoda, Suzuki, Volkswagen and Volvo." And am pretty sure more are coming.you are CLEARLY not the target market, so who cares? are you seriously comparing a BMW to a nissan leaf? or a nissan truck? BMW couldn't give half of a **** about your opinion on the matter, you weren't going to buy one with, without, monthly, or 300 dollar charge. believe it or not, there ARE people in the world where buying a BMW -IS- a viable option, and consideration of 300 vs. 80/year is perfectly fine.
you are CLEARLY not the target market, so who cares? are you seriously comparing a BMW to a nissan leaf? or a nissan truck? BMW couldn't give half of a **** about your opinion on the matter, you weren't going to buy one with, without, monthly, or 300 dollar charge. believe it or not, there ARE people in the world where buying a BMW -IS- a viable option, and consideration of 300 vs. 80/year is perfectly fine.
What a stupid idea. We got a Ford Flex in March of 2016 (I had to upgrade the bus with a new USB controller, but that wasn't hard) and a Mercedes GLS-450 in Nov 2016 - many cars were eliminated due to a lack of CarPlay. I did test drive the slightly smaller BMW SUV. It was a nice enough car, but didn't compare to the GLS. (And the salesman drove like an idiot before I got to drive.)
If it was a subscription CarPlay though, it would have been enough to say "Sorry, BMW."
Edit:
Not to mention their math is wrong: Pay $300 once. Or, "Over the course of a 3 or 4 year lease, it would still work out to less money than the option is now." Let's see:
4 year lease, minus 1st year free = 3 years.
3 years * $80/year = $320.
Is $320 less than $300? No. (Of course the time value of money isn't counted).
And we have had the last cars 6-7 years or 100k miles, whichever came first.
Idi.
Nobody's better at nickel-and-diming for options than the Germans, particularly BMW and Porsche....
...Not condoning the behavior, just pointing out that the German luxury car manufacturers are incredibly good at making money.
Edit:
Not to mention their math is wrong: Pay $300 once. Or, "Over the course of a 3 or 4 year lease, it would still work out to less money than the option is now." Let's see:
4 year lease, minus 1st year free = 3 years.
3 years * $80/year = $320.
Is $320 less than $300? No. (Of course the time value of money isn't counted).
And we have had the last cars 6-7 years or 100k miles, whichever came first.
Idi.
what other reason? like you not being able to afford a BMW in the first place? if you're not the target market, who cares?
YesJust a question, doesn’t the Apple CarPlay update come from the iPhone? I know when I updated to iOS 11, my Apple CarPlay looked slightly different and a few more things.
Correct.Thanks! So we get nothing at all for this subscription.