That notebook is using an Intel-integrated graphic chip which is less powerful the current nVidia solution in the MB, MBA and 13" MBP.
That notebook is using an Intel-integrated graphic chip which is less powerful the current nVidia solution in the MB, MBA and 13" MBP.
From the article:
"...Our main complaint about the Acer comes down to its graphics; while the Intel HD is far more capable than previous integrated GPUs, wed still prefer to see a dedicated GPU for extra performance. ..."
So not only is this thicker than a MBA it doesn't have discrete graphics either.
That notebook is using an Intel-integrated graphic chip which is less powerful the current nVidia solution in the MB, MBA and 13" MBP.
I'm not sticking up for the Acer laptop, but the original question was whether somebody was using a Core i3 in an ultraportable.
skunk said:Actually, I'm running a C2D iMac with 2GB RAM and it is far from useless. What high-powered apps would you be thinking of using on an 11" Air?If it is really 2G ram and C2d it's useless. C2D is bad but I could live with it of it's due to the GPU. 2 G ram is ridiculous, let's hope it's prototype only...![]()
Wrong. Here is the original question:
"Are there any Windows notebooks the size of the MBA with an i3 and a dedicated graphics card? "
The referenced laptop failed to meet those critera. Even more egregious is that the article itself points this out.
There are some with i3/i5/i7 with dedicated graphics cards but almost all of them are thicker , make battery trade-offs , pricing , or other compromises that MBA generally doesn't.
They need to make it a touch machine/ tablet.
It's not wise to go any lower on the prices points. Future problems will appear in the product line ir they do that.
It was me asking the original question (to which you replied), may I reproduce it here to further your reading comprehension?but the original question was whether somebody was using a Core i3 in an ultraportable.
Emphasis added.Are there any Windows notebooks the size of the MBA with an i3 and a dedicated graphics card?
And I told you I wasn't sticking up for the Acer. Go pick a fight with somebody else.
No, you just posted a link essentially saying that my preposition that there are no notebooks the size of an MBA and an ix + discrete graphics is wrong. You essentially said you had evidence that this preposition was incorrect, when in fact you did not have any evidence.And I told you I wasn't sticking up for the Acer. Go pick a fight with somebody else.
Get back to me when Apple releases Blu-ray.
This is the biggest fantasy I've seen in years.
A Mac laptop for $800-$900??
...I gotta see that. That would be a record. Suspect the cheapest price at $999 for an OSX device. $1299 for the 13". That's more like it.
I hope they come with something more fancy than a SD card slot, just because the rest of the lineup has those.
it is strange they have inputs on both left and right side. Macbooks are known to have connective inputs only on one side. The reason being having to explain to your grand parents (and general tards) where (for example) LAN RJ45 port should go to - its easy to say "look on the left side of the mac", rather than having to explain, "um jeez, try the left, back and right side of the notebook. i'm not sure....."
and it is easier to tidy cables if they all come from one side of the notebook rather than have wires protruding everywhere.
shanmugam said:less than $999 not going to happen, do not keep the hopes high folks.
lately Apple even raised the mini to $699 from $599.
deal breaker is intel CPUs which are costing a lot!
are we ready for AMD? or AMD ready for mobile? both looks NO!
there is a slim chance that Apple Designs and AMD Manufacture, is it possible?