Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Unless the company is self supporting and self financing, there is no such thing as privacy and security because they have to finance their enterprise somehow and unless already stated, the only way to do that is by selling ad space which means the ad companies will want to harvest your data. Brave Search can say all they want but if they have ad's then your data is being collected and use by the ad companies, end of.
Yep I don't trust any company.

Even cloud storage be it OneDrive, dropbox, box or google drive so on you will never trust it that people at the company have access to your data. If there is a server problem or file corruption or bad HDD problem some network admin could see it well fixing the problem. There could be staff there that look at it and harvesting the data.

Well only full encryption roll out would make it that they cannot see it be it cloud storage or internet browser but no company will do that.
 
Yep I don't trust any company.

Even cloud storage be it OneDrive, dropbox, box or google drive so on you will never trust it that people at the company have access to your data. If there is a server problem or file corruption or bad HDD problem some network admin could see it well fixing the problem. There could be staff there that look at it and harvesting the data.

Well only full encryption roll out would make it that they cannot see it be it cloud storage or internet browser but no company will do that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you misread "Facebook" as "Firefox." Firefox is great, and I use it.

I didn't say Apple is OK. Actually both Apple and Brave are irritating in the same way, pretending to be all about privacy when they're not. Brave is a scam in that they just give you open-source Chromium with adware added and act like it's special, and after that link editing stunt, it deserves deletion. Apple's privacy claims are fake too, but they also sell products that are nice in other ways if you don't care so much about privacy. It's really hard to get privacy right, and you're not gonna get it right by just using whatever is advertised as "private."

BAT is pyramid scheme because it's an altcoin. If they just wanted to pay creators, they could use any other cryptocurrency, but no, they found some pretend reason to need their own. Who owns most it? Probably Brave and people shilling Brave.

Yes I misread Facebook as "Firefox". Sorry.

You are making privacy a black and white thing. They either know nothing or know everything. Sure, brave did alter links that did not void your privacy but that chromium browser with built in adblocker collects WAY less data about you and tracks you WAY less. Any way you see it, it is the better choice between Edge, Safari, and Chrome. Its not perfect, but its way better. If you argue that FF is better, I won't tell you are wrong, it might be except for 1 problem that FF is not sustainable as Mozilla is losing funding, their Google Search contract is ending, and they have no source of income. They already released many of their employees and moved offices to a place cheaper. They might go bankrupt.

Again, even if you do not like BAT you do not have to buy it and you can get it for free by watching ads. It does NOT hurt. You will still enjoy the use of the open source and much more privacy oriented browser that is Brave over Chrome or Edge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bandaman
I actually trust Google with security of my data on their servers more than I do Apple. Apple services and security procedures are not that solid. The hardware is good but the services are so so.

BIG companies all have an intrinsic motivation to do what’s best for their revenue generation. It will vary but ultimately all have that motivation.
Apple is a BIG company so one should never assume altruistic motivation.

With that said, the post I’m replying to may be the most ultra wack I’ve seen in a while (and that’s saying something when it comes to chat boards). ‘I trust more the company that is the biggest miner of a user’s OL data, text metadata and activities on the entire planet’.
Just wow…
 
BIG companies all have an intrinsic motivation to do what’s best for their revenue generation. It will vary but ultimately all have that motivation.
Apple is a BIG company so one should never assume altruistic motivation.

With that said, the post I’m replying to may be the most ultra wack I’ve seen in a while (and that’s saying something when it comes to chat boards). ‘I trust more the company that is the biggest miner of a user’s OL data, text metadata and activities on the entire planet’.
Just wow…
If someone uses social media and Google search as their default search they have no right to preach privacy.

If you okay taking you laptop sitting on say a city bus so everyone can look at you than that is what social media and Google is doing.

But the debate is what is safer Firefox or Brave. I just said they are company that needs money to keep the company going and staff. Where is the money coming in?

If you want to see if product is safe look at where the money is company in and what is the businesses model? Can Brave servers me audited by the Linux foundation to see what software is running and the code looked at? Because if Brave, Duckduckgo or www.startpage.com software and servers cannot be audited by the Linux foundation than it will never be 100% that there is no tracking or logging.
 
You make it sound like a cult or something. :oops:
Well it is one thing if you search for some thing on duckduckgo and get no results and than search google to see if it comes up there. Well some die heart privacy folks may not even like that.

It is well other thing if google is your default search engine but posts all over forums about privacy and tracking.

And unfortunately there no replacement for youtube and google earth. I use google earth and Apple maps. But to company XBY bring out google earth I cannot switch.

But putting privacy away, I just find all search engines are only showing small part of the internet. All these years and search engines are still stuck in the 90s.

Well using google drive, google docs and google sheets may be okay for chemistry, physics ,math and biology notes and such, I would put any banking, finance,money, diary or pictures there.
 
But putting privacy away, I just find all search engines are only showing small part of the internet. All these years and search engines are still stuck in the 90s.
They cannot index 95% of the internet because it's the deep web and the dark web.
I would put any banking, finance,money, diary or pictures there.
That's just paranoia. Google isn't going to steal actual money from you.
And unfortunately there no replacement for youtube and google earth. I use google earth and Apple maps. But to company XBY bring out google earth I cannot switch.
The globe view in Apple Maps is not good enough?

Also, have you tried Vimeo as an alternative to YouTube?
 
They cannot index 95% of the internet because it's the deep web and the dark web.


Well you may not be able to index 90% of the internet the search engines should be improving every year. And there is no reason why searching message boards, quora, reddit and other question and answer sites are so terrible at showing up.


That's just paranoia. Google isn't going to steal actual money from you.

I don't trust companies or governments.

And there no such thing as 100% security. Every software, OS and firmware has vulnerability and is hackable.

Every month there are small window 10 updates for fixes for vulnerability and bugs. I’m not trusting the cloud for things I would not show the guy next door.

Even free open source non profit run by Linux community I would not trust. Even MacOS and Linux have been getting more malware and vulnerability.

And there is no such thing as encryption. All that means is less people can hack it. All encryption is hackable.

In 10 to 20 years the NSA will have software and quantum computers to hack every government, military and NSA in the world.

The police of Israel can get into any iOS. The FBI and many police have tools the police in Israel have that can get in any iPhone.

It is not clear if Apple has rolled out an update to stop this.


The globe view in Apple Maps is not good enough?

Also, have you tried Vimeo as an alternative to YouTube?
Apple maps are getting better every year. It can do 90% of what google maps can do but still cannot replace it. May be in 5 years from now it will be better than Google maps.

I’m not sure if Vimeo is free or not or how many videos they have.
 
Well you may not be able to index 90% of the internet the search engines should be improving every year. And there is no reason why searching message boards, quora, reddit and other question and answer sites are so terrible at showing up.
It takes time to index websites. Even then, Reddit, Quora, other message boards, etc... I see them all the time on search engines whenever I input a question.

The quality of the search results can also depend on the region you live in.
I’m not sure if Vimeo is free or not or how many videos they have.
Vimeo is free and has plenty of videos.
I don't trust companies or governments.

And there no such thing as 100% security. Every software, OS and firmware has vulnerability and is hackable.

Every month there are small window 10 updates for fixes for vulnerability and bugs. I’m not trusting the cloud for things I would not show the guy next door.

Even free open source non profit run by Linux community I would not trust. Even MacOS and Linux have been getting more malware and vulnerability.

And there is no such thing as encryption. All that means is less people can hack it. All encryption is hackable.

In 10 to 20 years the NSA will have software and quantum computers to hack every government, military and NSA in the world.

The police of Israel can get into any iOS. The FBI and many police have tools the police in Israel have that can get in any iPhone.

It is not clear if Apple has rolled out an update to stop this.
You're an anarchist?
 
This argument from the anti Apple group again? really? Ok, FYI, the secret is completely out. The point is made. Yes, Apple is a for profit company not acting out of pure goodness of heart. Worse! They’ve pushed and pushed privacy security as a selling point to increase sales. Those demons! And yes, non Apple companies getting less money because of less mined and collected data from Apple/Apple users is just not fair. If Apple’s privacy security push hurts Facebook financially, then Apple should hurt financially too! (Wait I think that’s almost exactly what Mark Zuckerberg said in 2018. Huh, whatever). Of course if Apple was data mining for massive ad monetizing then Apple would be hurt by their own privacy security push. **After reading that, now think one more time about the point you tried to make regarding “other company’s detriment” and the discussion on privacy security.

But you covered new ground with Apple has (human ears, really?) listening on Siri. 650 million iPhone users they better have a lot of ears. Good news for ya, local Siri is coming to 15. Not an easy feat per se as it probably requires some processing power. But that’s Apple’s description and their burden to make work.

You said “You think Apple Maps collects less data than Google Maps”. See below and as they say: learn it …live it…love it.
View attachment 1797613


Google is the world’s largest data-driven advertising company. They derive the majority of their profit this way.
Apple is the world’s largest tech consumer electronics company. They derive the majority of their profit from hardware sales of cons. Electronics.

The privacy security argument should be over. OVER. You anti Apple people have lost this one really really badly. Apple is, factually, quantifiably, FAR ahead of the competition on privacy security, by A LOT (for profit). Yet I suspect the argument isn’t over. This is the profit making Demon known as Apple. they! must! be! stopped! clear facts be damned!
You're putting words in my mouth about how I feel bad for Facebook losing money or something. No, I'm just saying, Apple doesn't push for privacy in ways that'll hurt their own profits. And it's not just cause they're a for-profit company. Some for-profit companies are really sensitive about privacy because their clients are. Apple is only mildly sensitive, probably because regular users aren't experts or don't care enough.

The humans listening to Siri convos isn't new and is often brought up. Here you go. Of course it's not every convo, just whatever they select for QA. When I use Siri, I expect a human might listen to it. Not a huge deal.

So the difference between Google Maps and Apple Maps, you're saying, is Google links financial, user content, "other data," contacts, and identifiers to you, but Apple doesn't. But Apple links health and fitness. It looks like those diffs on both sides are optional features. I don't even know how you get financial info into Google Maps. I guess if you use Google's contact book, your contacts are there, but the same could be said about iCloud. And just by having an iPhone, Apple must know your device identifier and way more.

Seriously, you "anti-Apple people"? Does it look like I have an Android phone or something? Sure I comment on privacy, but personally I don't care about my own privacy (to the extent that Apple's ads suggest I do) either way. Otherwise I'd have to use some wacky setup mostly devoid of Apple and Google products alike. "What happens on your iPhone stays on your iPhone?" Nah, not unless I air-gap it. The reason I use Apple stuff is it's the best in ways that normal people (like, not rms) care about, and I'm not poor.

Also, this is off-topic now. Point was, Brave is fake news, use Firefox or something.
 
Last edited:
Yes I misread Facebook as "Firefox". Sorry.

You are making privacy a black and white thing. They either know nothing or know everything. Sure, brave did alter links that did not void your privacy but that chromium browser with built in adblocker collects WAY less data about you and tracks you WAY less. Any way you see it, it is the better choice between Edge, Safari, and Chrome. Its not perfect, but its way better. If you argue that FF is better, I won't tell you are wrong, it might be except for 1 problem that FF is not sustainable as Mozilla is losing funding, their Google Search contract is ending, and they have no source of income. They already released many of their employees and moved offices to a place cheaper. They might go bankrupt.

Again, even if you do not like BAT you do not have to buy it and you can get it for free by watching ads. It does NOT hurt. You will still enjoy the use of the open source and much more privacy oriented browser that is Brave over Chrome or Edge.
You can just use Chromium with uBO if you want that. Privacy isn't black and white, but my trash can is, and something that smells exactly like adware and browser hijacking doesn't come out of there.
 
You're putting words in my mouth about how I feel bad for Facebook losing money or something. No, I'm just saying, Apple doesn't push for privacy in ways that'll hurt their own profits. And it's not just cause they're a for-profit company. Some for-profit companies are really sensitive about privacy because their clients are. Apple is only mildly sensitive, probably because regular users aren't experts or don't care enough.

You're putting words in my mouth about how I feel bad for Facebook losing money or something. No, I'm just saying, Apple doesn't push for privacy in ways that'll hurt their own profits.”
No I was not, nice try. And again I’m point blank, as I did before, calling you out for the ridiculous disparaging of Apple because they make decisions that consider profitable business. ‘They do it for profit’ is an internet poster trick,a ruse. Reality: a for profit company that makes a decision or action that benefits me/their customers is just that, a benefit for me/their customers. That they made the decision because they think it will bring in more customers and/or profit isn’t germane whatsoever in the tech/business world except for those trying to push an agenda by disguising it as morality (oh no! They could make more money from their decision that benefits me! How dare they!).

“So the difference between Google Maps and Apple Maps”…
Again, really? Public info on what each map app gathers (that I posted) but you’re still going to argue it? The stubbornness is admirable but mind numbing. You provided a rephrased jumble of the same ground trying to force something factually wrong into something else. Not working…
Again! The quarterly statements of all 3 companies are public information. Apple and your two, Google and Facebook, are public companies and therefore are bound by regulations to report income. From these we know Alphabet-Google then Facebook are the worlds biggest advertisers. Their ad businesses are incredibly and impressively advanced. They gather huge and widely varying data on users to make never before seen individualized selling profiles by the hundreds of millions. Every ad run for hundreds of millions (if not beyond a billion) is actually specific and customized to each individual. It’s staggeringly incredibly impressive but it also is, to many of us(not you), a massive invasion of privacy. Regardless of opinions on what is and is not invasion of privacy, the rest Is! Not! Up! For! Debate! The massive data collection to monetize that data via ads to generate the vast lions share of your two companies is unarguable fact, an absolute, ibid. Again, it’s all public information. Seriously, stop arguing against the facts.
Also absolutely factual and also publicly known, 1 Apple gathers a tiny fraction of user data that your two do, 2. They do not monetize ads to any degree. It’s a fact, this is not up for debate. It’s public record. Continuing as you do just reinforces how much you are intrinsically are against Apple and will fight facts to hold them in contempt.
Ironically, in your first paragraph you chastise Apple for deciding things for their own profit. Yet in the next paragraph you completely disregard Apple making a decision that does not enhance profit. Funny, right? And oh brother could Apple take in Billions! if they changed some code in iOS, in some apps, change up Eulas and stated policy docs. (If they did I’d reevaluate considerably — but Apple is too deep in pushing privacy to turn back).


Also, this is off-topic now. Point was, Brave is fake news, use Firefox or something.
By something you mean Chrome (your past posting shows you’re a big Google Chrome fan, not Apple, privacy isn't important). Yes, I do/did a quick scan of all recent posts to understand the clear POV I’m arguing with. While your posts are anti Apple (therefore you are anti Apple) — and I usually hit ignore for the anti Apple crowd (my ignore list is getting big) — I haven’t for you (wow, what an honor right, lol). At least you maintain a certain eloquence and don’t go wayyy into left field like many of your brethren (but there’s still time for that, unfortunately), some of whom I’ve already verbally sliced and diced with inarguable facts….with an assist from their past posts too. History can be a real problem for some 😂
To keep it on topic, Brave is not fake news. We’ll just disagree on that.

Seriously, you "anti-Apple people"? Does it look like I have an Android phone or something? Sure I comment on privacy, but personally I don't care about my own privacy either way.”
Yes, very seriously you ‘anti Apple people’. Do you deny they thickly exist here on this Apple forum? And as mentioned in my last paragraph, I saw your past posts (FYI, those who hide past posts get the facts in reply then get the ignore. Hiding posts is a sure troll sign). You’re a Big fan of Google Chrome, not a fan of Apple. Reasonable conclusion, you’re probably shining your Pixel right now (from all the constant extra button press fingerprints fixing that buggy device, lol kidding).
And finally I think I should thank you for being ambivalent about your privacy. While I will actively stop as much as possible of my data from being gathered by ad monetizers, those who don’t care about it do pay the bills at Google and a number of other companies/apps. I get my privacy, plus I get to use these companies/apps for free if I find it’s needed. It’s a win-win for all, yes. 😀
 
The problem with all these companies havng access to our data is that they are completly ignorant to privacy and security. Why? Just look at the many times companies have been charged for breaches of data privacy. Companies know they will be handed a meager fine if found guilty thus meaning there is no incentive to make sure the company acts properly. All they do is say 'sorry' and go about their business.

If a company knows that the size of a fine could put them out of business, it gives them the incentive to make sure their systems and processes are extremely secure. If Apple, Google, Microsoft or even Amazon where to lose customer data, they should not be hit with a few thousand dollar fine or a mere million fine, they should be handed billions of dollars in fines, fines that could cripple the company because it should be made clear to them that customer data is extremely important and should be protected at all costs from those who with to use that data for nefarious reasons.
 
You can just use Chromium with uBO if you want that. Privacy isn't black and white, but my trash can is, and something that smells exactly like adware and browser hijacking doesn't come out of there.

indeed you can, but there was something about Chromium that made it not preferable to the general public which can't recall which. I think its missing a lot of feature or something like that.
 
It takes time to index websites. Even then, Reddit, Quora, other message boards, etc... I see them all the time on search engines whenever I input a question.

The quality of the search results can also depend on the region you live in.

The thing is Google does not want to index websites from message boards so it is rank lower now.

The problem with the 90s and 2000s is most searches would take you to websites run by 14 olds so called geocities and sites like myspace, yahoo answer, blogs and message boards. This was the fun days not like now. If you did not believe first page ran by some 14 old.

The search was base on key words not AI. Remember anyone can posts stuff on the internet good and bad advice. Google along with political nature starting ranking the searches different on what Google things you should see.

Websites like geocities, blogs, messages boards and websites run by home owner will have content that is safe, not safe, true, false, crazy or good and bad.

It just people in 90s would sniff there all the information and come up with there own way of thinking.

Google has switched to schooler type search these days. The information on message boards, reddit, quora and message sites are information that can be true or false. And Google wants to move away from that.

I just find Google seem better before than what is Google now. And there really does seem to be move to AI search than just key word search.

There also large number of conservatives that say Google is anti conservatives and just pushing liberal stuff. But I think Google that censors this stuff is just pushing more conservative to the right. When the media and Google became anti Trump they just caused more conservatives to go to the right. Than if Google and media had more centrist view.


You're an anarchist?

I don't trust people and I really don’t trust businesses.

Even non profit and the Linux community I cannot trust with my data.

And I don’t have computing problem with limitations of OS, software or hardware for my workflow.

I think problem comes up with zoomers having hard time understanding culture of boomers that back in day that data was backed up and transferred stuff by some media than Zoomers having company stepping in and syncing stuff and putting every thing in cloud that is a company server.

I also find lot of younger people don't understand file manager and file types. With iPhone and Microsoft making it so easy now days. Well other thing they are pushing programming in high school but setting up your own server seem like getting PDd. And I just don’t understand that. When did computer networking and computer hardware become harder than programming.

If I needed such hard drive space and needed it to be able to aceses it on the go I would set up my own server than use some thing like OneDrive or Google Drive.

I look at cloud has some thing you would not want to show the person next door. If you are okay showing the person next door than so be it. I find zoomers will give up privacy because of convenience.

I never understand putting family photos in the cloud, money, banking or finance.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.