Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Last edited:
People who insist on using hardware from 2002? 🤣
🤣🤣
Find me a type-C equivalent to my $30 7 port (+3 power) USB 3 A hub that doesn't entail paying 10x as much for something that will provide no performance improvement whatsoever when used with the collection of USB 3.0 and USB 2.0 devices that I still need to connect (some bought in the last year). Then I'll think about getting USB-C cables for all my USB A devices.The world seriously needs to start getting over USB type-A connectors.
It's an observation for those who can't swallow $360, on the fence.In what way is that even remotely relevant?
The entire reason these docks exist is so that people with office setups can connect all of the desk peripherals to the dock, and when they bring their MBP to the desk, they plug in 1 Thunderbolt cable. That experience is worth every penny.
I can tell you I would be very cautious about buying another Caldigit Thunderbolt dock.I have no experience with this brand. That said, we have tested quite a few at work with our new 14 and 16inch Macbooks and the results are less than good.
Lot's of odd problems overall. The current one I use at work (not there at the moment) blacks out my video on my LG 4K monitor at least once a day for 30-60 seconds. It always comes back but if I run HDMI directly to my Macbook that never happens. Audio is hit or miss with my desk speakers and my USB-A Logitech mouse (small USB-A receiver) will get very laggy on screen until I reboot my 16inch Macbook.
We have yet to find a USB-C dock that does it all and does it all without issues. I think the bigger share of the blame probably goes more to Apple, the new M1 series of chips/chipsets and/or Monterey and its host of bugs. After all it is that hardware that limits the number of monitors and does not support EGPU's either.
I am kind of missing my 16inch Intel Macbook to be honest.
It's reasonable that they would still have USB-A. Think about customers that will complain about not having USB-A, versus how many people want the ports to be USB-C only. I would bet there are far more people in the former category than the latter. And for data-only USB which is what the non-Thunderbolt ports on this are, as long as they're gen 2, the speeds are the same between C and A. So people will largely either not care it's not type-C only, or they will be bothered if it's type-C only and want it to be type-A.When will the legacy USB port be treated like Firewire ports? I am so tired of USB-A using up port space.
Hdmi is far more useful, I have never bought or even seen a display with DisplayPort.
I'm not an expert in chipsets and such, but based on the fact that they mention that utilizing the 2.5G ethernet bandwidth requires a Thunderbolt connection, I'm hopeful that it is indeed PCI.Very interesting dock. 2.5GbE is nice. Hope they are using PCI base not USB as I learned on the other thread, PCI Ethernet is better.
No, it's a complete misunderstanding of what these products are for.It's an observation for those who can't swallow $360, on the fence.
That’s why I prefer this 18 port beauty, and it was only $229. Fantastic.No VGA, no purchase.
@alexe say hi to @kingtj1971Who the eff needs FireWire and miniDP in 2022?! ?
In all fairness it does have Display Port which is more capable than HDMI. Rather than buying a dongle you could just get an HDMI to DP cable, which are the same price as HDMI-HDMI cables. Or a TB to HDMI cable. And the cables are probably cheaper than a dongle, LOL.The most ports on any Thunderbolt dock ever, maybe… but still no HDMI. Can someone explain to me why the makers of these things seem to have such an aversion to it? It seems silly that I can pay so much money for one of these things but still have to use a dongle to connect any monitor I own to it. Is it a licensing issue?
...but the reality is that even most new midrange audio interfaces that advertise USB-C are just using the same USB 3.1g1 protocol - if not plain old USB 2 - as you got with plain old USB 3 (3.1g1 is, for most purposes, the same as 3.0 and even the 10Gbps USB 3.1g2 version doesn't need USB-C - plenty of PCs support it over type A). Even with "Thunderbolt 3 compatible" devices you need to read the small print because sometimes it just means "works with USB 3 via a Thunderbolt port". Yes, there are some high-end devices that actually use Thunderbolt (to support lots of channels or maybe better latency) but those go for 'serious callers only' prices.(At the time, that made sense because Firewire was faster and more CPU efficient than maxxing out the bandwidth of USB 2.0 with one of the other units.)
To be honest? There's a "not tiny" number of people working with music creation/production who are essentially stuck in this category. Sure, the big time "stars" have the bucks to keep buying the very latest -- tossing out whatever they bought earlier that's become unsupported.
But to give just a few of my own examples? I have a Line 6 POD Pro XT rack-mount f/x processor. It probably does date back to around 2002-04 but you'll find very recent videos on YouTube from artists talking about how great these boxes were, even by today's standards. There's a free downloadable library of custom guitar sound patches for them on the Line 6 web site, full of thousands of great ones. Unfortunately, Line 6 hasn't bothered to update their patch manager software in years -- so you either need an older Mac with an OS X version that still runs 32-bit apps, or you need to communicate with the POD via Windows 7 in a VM. Again, that limits you to a Mac with an Intel processor.)
I also have a Focusrite Saffire Pro 14 which uses Firewire. I paid extra, many years ago, to buy that Firewire-based box instead of one of many USB connected digital recording boxes on the market. (At the time, that made sense because Firewire was faster and more CPU efficient than maxxing out the bandwidth of USB 2.0 with one of the other units.) It still works well with Apple's USB-C to Firewire adapter and I really don't want to pay hundreds of dollars to replace it with another box with essentially identical jacks and functionality except USB-based to work with the latest Macs. Again though? Focusrite has moved on now and declared no more software support for the Saffires for these M1 series Macs.
That leaves a lot of us hanging onto older Macs to dedicate to the music recording process.