Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I guess if you're really tied to your iOS device and you want the connectivity, this is great but I hate the UI/interface. Those Fisher Price icons are not going to go well with cars like a Ferrari or a Mercedes. It's a good start for something like this but I hope in the future, there is some way to change the appearance of CarPlay depending on what car it's being used in.
 
What dashboard is used in the ad?

Does anyone know what brand of car is used in the ad, or is it just a mockup? I'm not talking about the Volvo demo, but the photos on the Apple Carplay page. Thanks.
 
I'm liking the way this is shaping up. It seems to be more mirroring and less proprietary and native. This potentially allows google to come up with their own solution that can inhabit the same space if you're an android user.

One thing I ask is that they allow map data to be stored natively in the car headunit - some of us have to drive through areas of poor to no cell coverage to get where we're going, and that's where we need maps the most.
 
Who else thinks this is a bad idea?

While driving you need to watch the road, not try to hit the right part of a touchscreen which is in a place where your arm doesn't usually go.
In my experience it is much much safer and easier to control the infotainment system with a couple of buttons and a scroll wheel (like Audi).

I think touch screen is a great idea. I've had it in my Toyota since 2007. If the UI is done properly it's great. I think scroll buttons are far more distracting and may explain the reason why many Audi drivers drive like idiots. :)
 
This is the way all new infotainment systems should be, just needs to be more open so you can use either android, ios, microsoft phones, and any apps that want to access the api. For example I can't use apple maps as it thinks I live on a golf course 10 miles away :( I want to use google maps.
that is up to Google now not Apple. Apple opened the API up now that's why you see Spotify

----------

Does anyone know what brand of car is used in the ad, or is it just a mockup? I'm not talking about the Volvo demo, but the photos on the Apple Carplay page. Thanks.

It is the new Volvo SUV, but I'm not sure what model.
 
that is up to Google now not Apple. Apple opened the API up now that's why you see Spotify

----------



It is the new Volvo SUV, but I'm not sure what model.


It's definitely not a Volvo. I'm talking about the still shots, not the video. It looks like a smaller car.
 
Personally, that interface ask you to have your eyes off the road for too long. Today I can change radio stations in my car and changing the AC without taking my eyes off the road. It is more intuitive.

I am not agreed with the Car Play system replacing the actual systems.
 
Nice. Can't wait. Been waiting for something like this since the first iPhone. Hopefully the new C class gets this feature in 2015.
 
I guess if you're really tied to your iOS device and you want the connectivity, this is great but I hate the UI/interface. Those Fisher Price icons are not going to go well with cars like a Ferrari or a Mercedes. It's a good start for something like this but I hope in the future, there is some way to change the appearance of CarPlay depending on what car it's being used in.

The CarPlay UI isn't even going to match the car's normal UI that is shown on the screen. CarPlay is only shown when an iOS device is connected. In a sense, it is only an app. I think it will work fine for most users, but the overall experience is not going to be very Apple-like because car manufacturers are still pushing their own interface.
 
I wonder how long it will be before we see aftermarket headunits supporting this.

In theory they should be cheap as it seems like the screen is 'dumb' and everything is powered by the phone itself meaning the headunit is only really a screen and an amplifier.

There are a lot of "digital only" head units out there (they are just there to take in Bluetooth/USB audio and pipe it to your stereo, with some rudimentary phone controls), although typically not with the large screen feedback (certainly not to the level seen here).

Personally, I'm happy controlling my audio on my phone and/or the physical button controls for simpler prev/next track navigation along with infrequent Siri use (would be more frequent if Siri supported Waze...). It is always in a predictable place except when handed to a passenger to control.

I don't see how reaching across to the centrally-located radio is "less distracting" (according to the commercial inserted here) than clicking on a smaller but more reachable and self-orienting screen right next to the steering wheel.

The main problem is focal distance, and radios are at a much nearer focal distance than a heads-up display or certainly the road in front of you; this is why there are the many hated restrictions on promoting anything visually-oriented while driving (including changing the thermostat, sadly). So, if you want "distraction-free" you need to be using the physical buttons, typically those on your steering wheel if you have them (and they are spread out enough to not require visual navigation).

... which is what after-market stereos already provide, of course.

(Note: Siri is also lower-distraction, although requires more cognitive processing to deal with (and periodic visual confirmation) than physical buttons. I'd note that Siri integration is available across the board on digital-ready aftermarket head units.)

I like the idea of a large glance-ready screen, and being able to interact with the screen by touch is a nice perk when stationary or sitting in the passenger seat. I just don't agree with the marketing here which shows using this large touchscreen and claiming it is less distracting than any other touchscreen. Physical knobs are less distracting (although still a pretty significant distraction, as shown in countless scientific studies). Touchscreens always require and/or significantly invite visual navigation, which is a huge distraction from the road; the only mitigation possible is making the touchscreen closer to the visual field of the road.

Overall, this seems like an incremental advance. Nowhere near as revolutionary as the old "dock connector" integrations were back when (even though they appear absolutely retro these days), but still moving in the positive direction. I can't see anyone really making a car-buying decision based on the presence of CarPlay, though.
 
I wonder how long it will be before we see aftermarket headunits supporting this...

It seems like a great new hardware product opportunity for Apple.

I'm only vaguely conversant with the terminology, but aren't there only two "BIN" sizes for in-dash stereos? Someone with more stereo-upgrade experience please comment!

Ieo said:
One thing I ask is that they allow map data to be stored natively in the car headunit - some of us have to drive through areas of poor to no cell coverage to get where we're going, and that's where we need maps the most.

The iPad Mini LTE model has GPS and I think that surmounts that problem (Edit: Now that I think about it, I guess that would be true for the phone, too). The Navigon app for phone & iPad lets you download maps, which might be the solution for you. Do other nav apps?
 
Does anyone know what brand of car is used in the ad, or is it just a mockup? I'm not talking about the Volvo demo, but the photos on the Apple Carplay page. Thanks.


It's a Honda Civic Coupe 2014:

2014-Honda-Civic-interior.jpg


..a Mercedes Benz S class:
teaser-for-2014-mercedes-benz-v-class_100443677_l.jpg


and a Volvo concept Coupe:
03-Volvo-Concept-Coupe-Interior-01.jpg
 
Last edited:
Very happy Ford was added to the list. I don't mind MyFord Touch (some people hate it), but Apple anything is typically better, and I'm all for better integration with my iPhone. Sadly I'm not looking for a new car any time soon, and the chances of them updating MFT in the older models to support CarPlay is slim. I agree with the people previously who have said turning the car screen into a dumb terminal (with a smart phone) is a good idea.
 
hmm. siri, kinda yes.

opening up integrated vehicle navigation, that's a pretty cool idea. but it worked already w/o special cables, whatever. of course, if it can be controlled by the on-wheel control buttons, then yes, it's something more.

but all this through a touchscreen? that sucks. you need to have visual. with knobs or haptic feedback controls, you don't have to look away from the road.

touching a touchscreen is actually giving an instruction. you can't just try to find the right control with your fingertips.

and adjusting temperature using touch controls is fubar, imo. i figure it may not be an integral part of carplay, rather a feature of the car itself, but i personally do not wish to set the temperature to an absolute value. i rather turn the knob (and feel the clicks) upward if there's to cold, and in the opposite direction if it's too hot. (innovation is to say no to 1000 things...)
 
I was getting a 2014 Honda Pilot for my wife but I think I'll wait till the fall for the 2015 model which should hopefully have CarPlay. After showing her the demo video, she definitely wants to wait for it. This is a smart move by Apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.