Guess we will see how it turns out. Currently I have the iPhone 6 and would not mind chopping off the bezels to have a more pocket friendly size phone.
I think we both know that iPhone users are more precious about their phones so if anyone is going to complain it’s them.True, but most people do pick up the phone to use it. I’m not a huge Android fan, but most newer models out there have the sensor on the back and there doesn’t seem to be much backlash about them in general.
Apple never stated it was a “cheap” phone. Their case was that it was the size that mattered to consumers. Not price. So theoretically they could charge whatever they want and put whatever features they want and consumers who want a small form factor will pay this regardless. I say, load it with all the latest technology and charge more. I’d rather have a small phone with a bezeless display and Face ID at £600 than a phone which lacked features and cost £329 again. Apple are clearly not scared to bump up the price of any iPhone regardless of size - see iPhone 8 and iPhone X.Incorrect. You don’t understand the point of the iPhone SE in the first place. It was a global phone that Apple intended to be for countries like India and China where smart phones are exorbitant in price and the cheaper price of the SE was meant to be affordable in countries to increase sales worldwide.
However, Apple did mention during the 2016 March Keynote that the SE was intended for those who did want a smaller iPhone, but the price was very _relevant_ as one of the main considerations why it does not have some of the latest technology. Regardless if you don’t care what it cost, others do where smart phones are not affordable for them.
Apple never stated it was a “cheap” phone. Their case was that it was the size that mattered to consumers. Not price. So theoretically they could charge whatever they want and put whatever features they want and consumers who want a small form factor will pay this regardless. I say, load it with all the latest technology and charge more. I’d rather have a small phone with a bezeless display and Face ID at £600 than a phone which lacked features and cost £329 again. Apple are clearly not scared to bump up the price of any iPhone regardless of size - see iPhone 8 and iPhone X.
Apple never stated it was a “cheap” phone.
Their case was that it was the size that mattered to consumers. Not price. So theoretically they could charge whatever they want.
So theoretically they could charge whatever they want and put whatever features they want and consumers who want a small form factor will pay this regardless.
I never insinuated it was “Cheap.”
If Apple charged whatever they want, then what would they have accomplished by doing that? The SE had to retain an affordable price point to be obtainable in countries like India and China where smart phones are exorbitant in price. For those who desired the SE, they don’t care about the latest technology, they care about the form factor and size. The SE was never really about including the latest technology.
Unlike some iPhone die-hards, I had a smartphone life before iPhones, and I'll have quite a nice one after as well. The SE brought me back to an iPhone. When Apple does away with it, they'll lose me as a customer.... not that my single purchase matters.![]()
I’m gonna throw this out there: what if Apple decided to place a fingerprint sensor in the back? Possibly inside thelogo?
I’d rather have a small phone with a bezeless display and Face ID at £600 than a phone which lacked features and cost £329 again.
If I had to choose between face ID and dual cameras I'd go with a dual camera.
Normally, I would agree with you. But for the SE, absolute top priority is that the external form factor does not change in order to keep using cases from the 5/5S era.
Imo cases are so cheap that would be a non factor for me. The camera quality is high on my priority list.