You're right, I'm not a programmer. I do write/author in Flash, Javascript, and HTML. I support several websites. But I'm not a Programmer. I'm an MCP in several certifications. I was even Novel certified. Have built many computers, networks, and done IT for years. But I'm not a programmer. Not any more. I did my Perl and Pascal time, but I'm not a programmer.
As far as Flash problems on all platforms..... Not being smart, but I'm really puzzled at that statement. I don't have problems with my Flash running. I have one website where I have Javascript menus, and 3 different Flash files running simultaneously. Seriously. I'm being honest here..... I don't have problems with the flash. I do have some problems with it running on ALL the browsers if I don't write it, or the HTML correctly. But, that is a Browser problem (or coding problem... depending on how you look at it). And the flash files are very small in footprints.
I really do wish I could find something for writing HTML5 or converting SWF that was easy to use. At this point, in order to use HTML5, you have to go through difficult coding.
If you are a Programmer, there could be a fortune awaiting you writing a good WYSIWYG Application/Software. And I may be one of the first to buy, if it's priced right.
Jobs isn't the only one to "ban" Flash.
Remember that many other mobile devices do not support Flash; since these other companies are running content stores like the iTunes Store/App Store, they have no financial basis to deny Flash.
As a matter of fact, they all claim that they ban Flash for performance reasons. Even Mozilla removed Flash support at the 11th hour before the release of Firefox Mobile for Maemo, again specifically claiming that Flash performance was unsatisfactory.
This is not Steve Jobs' personal vendetta against Flash. Much of the mobile world finds Flash to be an unsatisfactory performer.
Now I know this will elicit responses by people who will yelp "Flash runs on Device X!" "It runs great on Device Y!" but the fact of the matter is that some people who design, manufacture, and market these devices have enough qualms about Flash to leave them off their devices.
look at this s*%t I'm not even doing anything on the damn webpage it's just the darn intro page
Yea, unless we're really lucky and Adobe makes a porting function in Dreamweaver.
Too bad Flash isn't just for video, as opposed to what some people think, it's also for animations and games,
You are missing something. Have you actually verified what you claim?Youtube HTML 5 can play full screen on both the Mac and iPad in Safari. Or am I missing something?
That's amazing. You're probably the only person I've ever heard of that has *never* used Youtube, seeing as how they have just beta tested HTML5 recently and has been flash based since inception.I installed ClicktoFlash to see if I ever need to click on it. I haven't had the need.
But unlike some people here seem to be, I'm not a fanatic either way. I'm just a "user" who can't bother to pronounce half the things you're sarcastic about.
What's your issue? It runs great on Firefox on my MBP.look at this s*%t I'm not even doing anything on the damn webpage it's just the darn intro page
I wonder what Mozilla is going to do about H264 being the unanimous vote standard for HTML5.
Many sites use slow loading flash just to present fairly simple slideshows, video clips or to bring up some colorful buttons superimposed on a picture. I doubt many of those applications would miss Flash.Even HTML5 + Javascript does not even come close to replacing AS3 or Flex. Go jump on Wikipedia and do a little reading...
Adobe Flash, you are the weakest link, Good Bye
I can't wait for more and more HTML5 video! Flash can go die.
So true. I expect to see many more articles like this one in the coming days/weeks.
Die Flash, die.
Wirelessly posted (SAMSUNG-SGH-A821/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.4 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configuration/CLDC-1.1)
Just go HTML5 on everything already
just wait for Hulu on HTML5 then that shall be the slow death of flash.
take that flash supporters.
And so it begins
Expect ABC to follow suit shortly. Theres been rumors for months Disney is ditching Flash entirely on all their properties, which is a big deal considering pretty much every site they have is made in Flash.
This is a beautiful Flash video. Windows 7 & Firefox 3.6.2 ran great.
Have you tried running it in Firefox? Just wondering if it's OS X, or just Safari.
What's your issue? It runs great on Firefox on my MBP.
You are missing something. Have you actually verified what you claim?
I'm looking at a Youtube video, in 720P, in HTML5 and there is *no* fullscreen option. And it runs like CRAP, stuttering all over itself. The same vid on Firefox in 720P runs like a champ in *full screen*.
Here's the video in HTML5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bHWuvzBtJo
That site uses around 57%. No big deal. Are you trying to conserve CPU usage? LOL.My processors spike up in firefox as well not just safari, flash is not using something right on OS X. Like I said this has been true since 10.2 and you just learn to deal with it. For the most part, sites I visit are not built entirely in flash but I think 4 oses later and 8 yrs for my Mac pro to still have 4 processors pinned when viewing a flash page is just darn sad.
it runs "great" on my mac pro too, my issue is that 4 processors are running at more than 30% for a simple intro page. Can you post what activity monitor looks like on your MBP, I doubt it runs more efficiently than my computer.
Bwahahahaha. That's not fullscreen. See how you can see your browser still? Wow. Just wow.Problem?
Bwahahahaha. That's not fullscreen. See how you can see your browser still? Wow. Just wow.
I don't see it in fullscreen. And the video is still a stuttering mess.You...you can see the fullscreen option in the lower right, right?![]()
You are missing something. Have you actually verified what you claim?
.
I don't see it in fullscreen. And the video is still a stuttering mess.
Who's backtracking? Just like the person above said, there's no fullscreen in the current Safari. I don't know what version allows fullscreen, but the current version does not have it. But don't let facts get in the your way.You stated "There isn't even a fullscreen option."
But hey, don't backtrack on my accord.
And forget about getting full access to websites such as Porsche, BMW, et. al. that use flash.
What's the "CLEAR Work Around" for all the Flash based games that millions of youngsters play online ever day?
That's funny, because the CEO of Apple can give two flips about his customers not being able to access the web in its entirety.Who has more to lose in that scenario? A lot of websites rely on flash because they have hired lazy and/or incompetent web developers to make their sites.
I can assure you the CEO of Porsche gives two flips about flash, and if he was presented with the reality that 10s of millions of people would be unable to view their website because their programmers are lazy, the programmers would be replaced.
Who's backtracking? Just like the person above said, there's no fullscreen in the current Safari. I don't know what version allows fullscreen, but the current version does not have it. But don't let facts get in the your way.
Matter of fact, how do I not know that he is showing the flash version of a video about HTML5? I just checked that video and yep, no fullscreen button.