The CCC is to some degree the German equivalent of the Electronic Frontier Foundation in the US. They are not some random web site. They would not fake such a thing, as the EFF wouldn't do it. The have way too much reputation built up over a lot of years that they would risk that for flash publicity.While he might have "successfully" (which I am highly skeptical. Wouldn't it make more sense for him to give the latex fingerprint to SOMEONE ELSE that wasn't him to prove that anyone could use it?) bypassed the fingerprint lock, there are a couple things to keep in mind here.
This video is BS. I'm switching to 9to5 Mac. So tired of Mac Rumors posting bait and click stories. Everything else they post comes from other sources first. So long. I'll let the door hit me on the way out to speed up the process.
I want to know the logic that put the green light into the fingerprint sensor. There are very sophisticated biometric scanners that does an deep ultrasound scan where not just the fingerprint but the individual contours of the distal phalanx (the bone of the finger tip) are scanned for matching. Issue with those systems are power and processing time to match. The last one of these had a scanning head about the size of a baseball and not small enough for a form factor such as the iPhone.
Why are people surprised by this, like its news? Here's a tip, if someone comes up to you ands asks you to make a 2400dpi scan of your finger, say no.
This isn't a hack, this is still the reader responding to a perfectly accurate facsimile oft he owners fingerprint. And no one else's.
If you leave your phone at the AMC or Bar, tell me how this is doing to work for the finder of your phone?
This is not true with iOS 7, not with Apple's new Activation Lock feature. If you lock out your iPhone, the person has to have your Apple ID & password to activate it, even if it is wiped/DFU mode, etc. It's finally true theft prevention, no one can steal your iPhone and use it anymore. Someone can't steal it to sell it because the person buying it can't use it.This is silly because any phone can be sold to someone with the abilities to unlock any of these mechanisms. as someone who had their phone recently stolen, the thief did not really care what model or how it was locked, they just took the **** out of my pocket at a festival. i went home and wipe my phone remotely so that my account details and credentials could not be extracted by someone who knows how to do that. the thief is most probably not that same person.
my point is anyone going after you hardware does not care about how you are locking up your personal data. all that **** will be wiped for resale anyway
A simple three step process to unlock ANY iPhone
- Get stolen iPhone
- Lift a finger print from the back of the iPhone or from the glass (Most iPhone users do not wear gloves and leave finger prints all of the glass and the backs of their iPhones
- Use the lifted finger print to unlock the phone.
You don't even need access to the user or even need to know who owns the phone because the owner likely left the "un-lock key" all over the phone in multiple places
Yeah, because getting a 2400 dpi photo of someone's fingerprint and going through this is so easy.
Why are people surprised by this, like its news? Here's a tip, if someone comes up to you ands asks you to make a 2400dpi scan of your finger, say no.
Now that im thinking about it, all you need to open my front apartment door is a SLEDGE HAMMER, available at all hardware stores for 20$.
Somehow, i still feel secure. Damn Apple, they told us it was secure! All you need is the finger in question, a 2400 dpi scan and a 17 step process that have 17% chance of working. So much for my iphone security...
And how exactly do you plan on "lifting" the print?
And how exactly do you plan on "lifting" the print? Because so far, it seems like the video has set the bar for how "easy" it is to lift it properly....
Not so simple anymore, huh?