Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And I'm surprised how open Apple has been lately. . It's almost like they finally are feeling the heat from their fan base. They should be more open about their product line and express their loyalty to the Mac, versus saying things reiterated time and time again.
They haven't done anything yet....so before the last few days what was in that exciting lineup Tim spoke about at the last update...so far a cheap iPad? Clearly no Pro?
 
2019. Christ.

This essentially proves Ive and Co. haven't even been seriously designing successors to the Mac Pro in the background, over the past four years.

Ehh I wouldn't mix the words "rumor" and "proves" in the same sentence.
 
Not surprising from what we see in the MBP forum.


Its been in limbo for 3 years, so its good that Apple laid out a roadmap of what will happen.


Not sure why it took this long but its definitely welcome news

My main beef with the new MBP is the price, I mean here in the UK they used Brexit as an excuse to hike the prices up first, and then they go and hike it up again the same as every other country just because it's a new model! And then they are 'surprised sales of the old MacBook Pro went up'.... :rolleyes:

Now come one, it really is beginning to sound like pig headed arrogance and blinded by the money is getting to them.
And if they sell the iPhone 8 over $1000 will they be surprised if it's sales drop too?
 
I'm glad they switched strategies, but wow does that seem slow. Not great optics for Tim either. Makes it seem like him and his management team have no vision for the company. And really is this all that surprising to them? Pro users don't like buying $4,000 machines you can't upgrade? Imagine that...
Two to three years for product-development for something as complex as a Mac Pro is not at all out-of-line.
 
The bigger issue here, maybe some have seen or said this already, is that Apple never listened to the Professional market in the first place.

Not everything needs to be mega powerful with 69GBs of RAM nad 3TB SSDs, but things in the <$1999 price range do have to warrant the price. Adding $500 for the touch bar was insane, and the price was .... meh on the MacPro, but there's no reason Apple should claim it was expandable when all we were doing was plugging things in via dongles.

The only need I have for a MacPro is to run software that isn't Mac-specific. Therefore I have the potential to go with any system. Many professionals were in the same boat.

Can't wait for 2019, but I'm not holding my breath.
 
While everyone complains about ports I'm pretty sure it was the price hike of the touchbar models that actually did them in. Not to mention the touchbar adds battery draining hardware with minimal practical gains to the machine.
 
Wow! So prior to that they thought they could sit on the old TrashcanPro design without any updates for the next 5 years? That statement doesn't sound right at all.

It's possible that they thought there would continue to be improvements in performance/watt on the desktop side in a similar manner to the mobile side (though less aggressive). Instead the GPU industry stagnated on 28nm forever and their darling AMD hasn't done a whole lot of anything on the high end in years. People also probably overestimate the gains on the Intel side since the 2013 model was released. It's very, very incremental.

I don't think there was much to revamp in terms of GPU/CPU until Nvidia released Pascal, but AMD doesn't have anything to compete on the high end and NV probably had no interest in developing for the trash can form factor.
 
Better late than never. But Apple not realizing that a vocal group of users can use whatever the biggest and best CPU and GPU there are is surprising. When the thermal issue became clearly insurmountable, they should have came up with another option. And it should not in any way have been influenced by the use case for very slim notebooks (which is what the MacBook Pro is). There will also be thermal issues in any laptop. So did Apple think that the laws of thermodynamics were going to be cancelled for the computing industry?
What are you talking about. They FIXED the Thermal issues with the MacBook Pro's design. Completely.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple...2016-2-6-GHz-i7-Notebook-Review.185254.0.html

http://appleinsider.com/articles/16...acbook-pro-with-touch-bar-vs-2015-macbook-pro
 
The problem with apple isn't the engineers. It's run first and foremost by Marketing goons. And you also have to keep in mind the captain is a bean counter. Sure it's good for business but with this much money in the bank you'd think the captain wants to go for some new innovation but let's just keep growing the pot.
No, the captain is a Logistics and supply-chain expert; not an accountant. Big difference.
 
It is AWESOME Apple is listening.

I'm glad to say I'm one of those people who bought a Touchbar MacBook 13", gave it an honest 3 week try because usually Apple changes stuff, and humans don't like change, and it ends up for the better - but I ended up straight out baffled by the sheer uselessness of the TouchBar, so I returned it.

It hindered me constantly, missed keystrokes, baffled by what it showed, constant flashing in the corner of my eye, and interaction model that requires you to look away from your work so you can stare down it. iTunes that shows you progress of a song (??), using Xcode so there are no less than 3 mystery meat "play" triangles showing, etc, etc. Complete removal of the "I'm in the flow of work and my hands and computers are my no-need to look tools (ahem iPad)". Amazing misfire. If Apple is convinced of its utility and its eventual future (haptics, screen raises to become button, etc) then put it on top of the existing function key row and convince us of its utility. Make it so useful, that we are all saying "why is the useless function row here please remove it".

Progress is hard, usually its made by ripping off the band-aid, but all this did was open up a new wound we didn't even know we had.

Are the new MacBooks a stunning marvel of engineering, build quality, screen, trackpad ? You better believe it. I am thrilled with my decision to return the MacBook 13" touchbar for the non touchbar model. I am not thrilled this is considered the low end MacBook so has relatively low end performance and lack of ports.
 
"pairing the iPad Pro with a Mac so that it can be used as a Cintiq-style drawing tablet."

This would be huge. I am looking at Astropad but if Apple can figure out a way to use the iPad Pro ?Apple Pencil in conjunction with the Mac that would be awesome. I have my Wacom and love it but the Cintiq is just too much $$.

That would be great and Apple really needs to do this as an alternative to the Surface style PCs. If they aren't going to make the iMac a touch screen, pair a decently priced iMac with a basic 13" iPad Pro and give it first party support. And as of now this combo would be a good bit cheaper than a Surface Studio and more versatile in some ways too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mollyc
This predicament perfectly demonstrates Apple's biggest problem right now: Tim Cook is making great business decisions...at the expense of professionals and those most loyal to Apple. I'm glad to hear that they know we're angry, but so far it's just unsubstantiated talk. We'll see what products this correction leads to, but I've thought several times about selling my MBP with touch bar and buying an older MBP, so this news isn't a surprise to me.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.