[If their product is flawed and doesn't suit your needs, return their product for a refund. It's the capitalist way.
I'm going to ignore the bold, which really is a tool for weak argumentation.
No, it's not that simple. Why? Why can't I just go and buy another product? This is why it's not that simple:
-I bought an iPhone original. It's a great product.
-I bought many apps that I can't use on any other products
-Apple says I cannot upgrade my iPhone to the latest OS
-Apple has no means of downgrading app versions, except by recovering them from recycle bin. This would be ok with me, if I could save 2 versions of an app. Why? Because I have an iPad, too - which is eventually 4.0 capable.
-iTunes has various annoyances built in to auto-upgrade apps. This is as per Apple strategy to lock you into an upgrade cycle.
-If I move to an Android phone, I've essentially flushed the cost of all the apps I have down the toilet. My $10 beejive license won't transfer over to Android. My $10 office 2 go won't transfer to Android.
I don't think that you think about things like this when you respond like you did. I think that you should think about your responses before you post.
The discussion is not that simple. If Apple is going to insist on App distribution exclusivity, then they have a responsibility to offer an upgrade that is functional AS PER THEIR OWN DEFINITION IN THE IPHONE KEYNOTE:
1. Brilliant antenna design
2. Thinnest smartphone at the moment the Keynote occurred.
Bumper does not equal brilliant antenna design. I don't enjoy the freedoms of capitalism, as you put it, because iTunes is not a free market cross-phone-hardware. So no, LagunaSol, it's not the capitalist way, as you've put it.