That's how it works everywhere and AT&T should not be an exception.
not everywhere, just the U$A. that kind of attitude is what keeps allowing carriers to bend us over and give us a Kobe.
That's how it works everywhere and AT&T should not be an exception.
Because the unsubsidized first-gen iPhone was an aberration and should not be considered the standard operating procedure. When you got the new subsidized price on the 3G, you in effect extended your contract by 2 years. So, while you may have been an AT&T customer for 3 years, you still have some time left on your clock before being eligible for another subsidy. If anything you got screwed the first time around by paying full price and still being locked into a 2 year contract. When you got the 3G, it's not like the contract you signed took effect retroactively the day you signed the contract for the first-gen iPhone. AT&T tried to make this up to you by allowing you to "break contract" (I know it doesn't feel that way to you) without paying the early termination fee and re-sign up under a new contract to get the 3G at a subsidized price. Hope this makes some sense...
the only reason people keep saying this is because they are the people getting the full subsidy. if they weren't getting the 199/299 they would be as angry as the 3g owners.
I understand your point. I get that I signed a contract and this and that. I get that. And don't take me for someone who thinks anyone should get a full subsidy after only 1 yr of their contract because I was fully prepared to either not get the 3GS at all or bite the bullet and shell out hopefully no more than $399 for a 16 gig before all of this occurred to me. I'm just stating that I signed an original iPhone contract and received nothing from ATT for doing so (seems silly now) and they received a full 13 months of $90 payments from me. Then I renewed my contract and received a subsidized 3G and ATT got 11 months of $100 payments from me. So thats 2 yrs (my original post was wrong when i said 3 yrs, but the principle remains the same) of payments from just 1 subsidized phone. I don't dispute my contractual obligations but it seems that ATT should make this exception on principle alone. This exact situation would have been hard to envision 1 yr ago, but I think this situation deserves ATT's attention.
If most of the people would spend as much time reading the AT&T contract they signed when they got their phones as they do on apple rumor sites, the rest of us wouldn't have to listen to their b*tching.
I talked to someone at AT&T today and they told me, though they couldn't really say when or how, but they had heard that a solution is being worked out by AT&T and Apple to make the current iPhone users happy.
So, who knows. They could have just been telling me that to make me happy and to get off the phone.
when I checked the website (apple) they said i would get standard iphone upgrade after 7/12/09. Does that mean I can qualify for an upgraded for the 199/299 pricing?
I talked to someone at AT&T today and they told me, though they couldn't really say when or how, but they had heard that a solution is being worked out by AT&T and Apple to make the current iPhone users happy.
So, who knows. They could have just been telling me that to make me happy and to get off the phone.