I am surprised Apple let this happen.
Think that wont happen? Well look... Apple themselves have said there are 40 million handsets out ther currently, a lot of people who are likely to want an iPhone, already have one.
The problem is that the iPhone now probably costs around $200 dollars to make. Charging people $699 for a phone is outrageous.
http://i.gizmodo.com/229664/iphone-only-costs-250-to-make-rest-of-price-is-fanboy-tax
I fail to see the reason to upgrade to a new iPhone if you already have the 3G version
Just spoke to 02 UK upgrade representative. I purchased an iPhone 3G in July last year around launch and it was found that I have to 'buy off' the remainder of my contract and start a new contract to purchase the new 3GS phone at the asking subsidised rate, which works out to be ridiculously expensive. As it will be December before I am eligible for an upgrade, there's no point upgrading to the 3GS as waiting another 6 months I would get (asuming the 12 month refresh cycle on iPhones) a spanking new model. Software 3.0 will keep me going until then. Disappointing but we shouldn't expect anything less on a contract phone, no other carrier would let you upgrade early for the sake of it.
I am not sure how there can be any confusion on the pricing when you can go to either the Apple or AT&T site, choose either new or existing subscriber, if exisiting give some info and your current pricing pops up along with a future subsidy date. People signed a contract for 2 years, consider yourself lucky if you recieve any subsiby before the 2 year agreement you signed expires. Don't worry about what others are paying, look at YOUR price, if you think the phone is worth it, then buy it, if not, don't.
I, on the other hand still have my original iPhone and did not think the 3G was worth an upgrade a year ago, but now I get the new 3GS with 32GB for a cool $299. I will be styling come June 19th with the greatest phone in the galaxy, while many others, unfortunately, will be filled with unjustified anger. Oh well, better you than me.
![]()
Ok here's what I'd like to know... I purchased an 2G on launch day (unsibsidized right?) and a 3G on launch day (subsidized), that adds up to almost 3 yrs of an ATT contract but only one subsidized phone. So why wouldn't I be eligible for the same subsidized pricing as someone at the end of a 2 yr or even 18 month contract. I think this is a very valid point. Sry if someone else already brought this up but I didn't see any post on this specific point.
I will be styling come June 19th with the greatest phone in the galaxy, while many others, unfortunately, will be filled with unjustified anger. Oh well, better you than me.
![]()
absolutely superb post, and spot on!![]()
I bought my iPhone in Nov of 2007 (so 3 months before you). We should be in the same boat as far as upgrade eligibility. I went on the AT&T site just like you did. I am eligible for an upgrade, but the 3GS wasn't a given option.
If you go to the Apple Store you can purchase the 3GS. You should only pay the subsidized price. I ordered mine today, and it says I should receive it on the 19th, although I expect it to ship on the 19th.
I don't feel sorry WHATSOEVER for the complainers with the 3G. I deliberately waited for this new phone to come along and did not upgrade to the 3G because I thought it would be worth waiting for a phone that offered more of an upgrade than just 3G. AT&T doesn't owe you a darn thing until your contract is up (or the few months prior to that). Then, they will offer you some incentive to keep your business. You made your choice last summer. You didn't have to upgrade then. Many of us didn't. You can justify being disappointed or mad that you chose to upgrade last year, but you can't really blame anyone else. Someone made a good suggestion. Sell your 3G. That'll pay for the difference in subsidy.
I fail to see the reason to upgrade to a new iPhone if you already have the 3G version
Ok here's what I'd like to know... I purchased an 2G on launch day (unsibsidized right?) and a 3G on launch day (subsidized), that adds up to almost 3 yrs of an ATT contract but only one subsidized phone. So why wouldn't I be eligible for the same subsidized pricing as someone at the end of a 2 yr or even 18 month contract. I think this is a very valid point. Sry if someone else already brought this up but I didn't see any post on this specific point.
Its probably made on the same assembly lines. No new factorys to build, no new employees to build it. maybe some training. So yea, it should be cheaper. But if If I have to bay $599 and not extend my contract, I will. But the way it seems people who bought the 3G unsubsidized are getting hosed as well.
I don't have a problem only upgrading every 2 years. Yes there is a hardware upgrade every year, but but with the last 2 there haven't been anything so huge that I feel like I'm carrying around an ancient piece of technology. I still get the OS update, so I don't have much to complain about. I don't blame AT&T or Apple for not wanting to subsidize a device as expensive as the iPhone every year for whoever thinks they deserve it. They would never recoup thier losses on it. We simply have to play by the rules, what's so hard to understand about that.
It's not the end of the world if I don't get a 3GS, in 12 months something better will come along.
Agreed. Seriously people. Apple and AT&T went out on a limb last year and did something nice for you, that doesn't mean you get special treatment forever. If you buy a blackberry and there is a new model next year no one expects to be able to be the subsidized price on it again.
Honestly, I don't think they should have even let original iPhone users upgrade the last time if they got a subsidized handset (as backup or sold for cash)! If they hadn't got a subsidized one then they wouldn't have needed special treatment in the first place.
I'm convinced Apple just isn't going to be able to give the users the experience they'd like to until they own their own cellular network or partner with someone to do it. These clowns just keep throwing their anti-consumer wrenches into the machinery. Doesn't Apple have something like $30B sitting in the bank? How about putting some of that to use? What I'd like to see is someone buy or start up a cel network that simply rents bandwidth by the month and has no ties to any particular device or service.
That's how it works everywhere and AT&T should not be an exception.
Oh yeah. We'll we went out on a limb and signed a 2 year contract which means 2000 over the course of two years.
A business is a business and at the end of the day. YOU MAKE MORE MONEY BY ALLOWING CURRENT 3G CUSTOMERS TO UPGRADE AT $199!!!! And ******** if the iphone is $599. The original iphone used to be $599 but it was actually $399 which equals our mid contract subsidized price.
Most of you guys don't get it. It's a contract but it's always ATT / APPLE thats ripping us off. If you think ATT is being "nice" you got are naive as it gets. ATT has been doing this for all their phones because its more effective in the long run to keep in a contract.
It just means ATT won't have my business NEXT YEAR which measn they lose 1000 bucks and verizon or where ever iphone lands will get it. It's smart business to keep your customers happy. ALL OF THEM. That means I want my effin MMS!!!!!