Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
" data-source="post: 30781156" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
There are beds, there aren’t staff to work those beds.

You know. Staff fired for not getting the Fauci Ouchie, while COVID positive staff are being asked to work.

Looks like you missed the part where I said which means there aren’t enough staff to work beds.
 
Saw this graph from this article. Can't vouch for its veracity, but might be useful for trying to figure out when to test:

61c4825a1f3fca0018a53794
 
Saw this graph from this article. Can't vouch for its veracity, but might be useful for trying to figure out when to test:

61c4825a1f3fca0018a53794

PCR are good for a specific period of time and after that time you can still get false positive due to remnants of the virus still lingering in your system.

FDA won’t recommend it, but every other country has recommended that for home testing kits to swab the back of the throat and then your nostrils for testing purposes since the bulk of Omicron likes to live in the throat/esophagus more so than the nasal passage. Individuals that had the symptoms/signs of infection would perform the home at kits as directed and show as negative. Then if they swabbed the throat and nose as other health ministries have directed they actually test as positive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nebo1ss
FDA won’t recommend it, but every other country has recommended that for home testing kits to swab the back of the throat and then your nostrils for testing purposes since the bulk of Omicron likes to live in the throat/esophagus more so than the nasal passage. Individuals that had the symptoms/signs of infection would perform the home at kits as directed and show as negative. Then if they swabbed the throat and nose as other health ministries have directed they actually test as positive.
There was a good article in The NY Times taking about saliva vs nose tests:


Bottom-line for Omicron it may be better, but more testing needs to be done. Apparently a lot of things in the mouth can throw off the tests (e.g. if you just drank a Coke it can change the pH and trigger a false-positive).
 
  • Like
Reactions: CNebs
Yep, it’s “mild”, deaths are only up 33% from a week before, cases are up 53% from a week before. It amazes me that as a society we are totally cool with ~1,500 deaths a day. We are ~4.25% of the world population, but have the most deaths compared to any other country. This is not a standard “cold” or “flu” that people want to label it as. It’s an airborne multi-organ inflammatory virus that crosses the blood brain barrier. These are not attributes of a cold or flu, but if you want to continue to believe that narrative by all means do so at risk. That from all indications may introduce long term disabilities from diabetes, kidney damage, lung damage, and shrinkage of grey matter. Hey the potential for dementia at a younger age sounds totally fine. If you look at the current cost of healthcare in the U.S. pre-COVID we are at a trajectory that is not sustainable. People want to scream but the economy, sure I get that, but what do we do when long term health and a higher rate of disability from this disease prevents people from working to continue to contribute to the economy? That will be more costly in the long run. Healthcare here is not preventive, it is reactionary because as a society most are lazy and would rather have a pill and last resort surgery to fix majority of preventable diseases. I do understand that some disease you can’t prevent by taking ownership of your health, but it’s cheaper for the person and country as a whole to work from a preventative standpoint then wait until you rely on our current system of healthcare.

I get we want to get back to normal, I want it more for others than I want it for myself but this attitude of f it doesn’t work. Plus the fact that certain groups want to piss and moan that we’re not back to normal when they at the same time have done nothing to get back to normal is beyond stupid.

*Oh and hospitalizations are up 29% from a week ago. So when you hear there are no beds, there are NO beds. Which translates not enough staff for the beds. So when you have a stroke, heart attack, in a car accident, your kid is hurt, need surgery, guess what it isn’t going to happen at those hospitals suffering staffing shortages and beds. People that could have been helped that did everything they could to help others will die alone or be permanently disabled in the case of a massive stoke as an example. All because of others selfishness.
I appreciate your passion, and you make some good points. However, it is worth noting that numerous experts do see Omnicron as a milder form of the disease, and believe this variant may well be "good news" in the longer term.....that is a few weeks or a month out.


There is another problem. Unfortunately, Health Officials have lost some credibility in the eyes of the public. Some of this is unfair and some of this is due to just plain bad messaging. Here are a couple of articles:


My point is this. My family and I have been very cautious throughout the pandemic. We have followed guidance. Everyone is fully vaccinated and boosted. We all wear masks wherever required. But, it is getting more and more difficult to have faith in the people in charge. I am wondering what the CDC data really means. When the CDC admits that almost half of the hospitalizations are incidental COVID, I start to think the data is misleading. When they tell us that the vast majority of vaccinated deaths are elderly people with more than 4 comorbidity, I start wondering about the death statistics associated with this disease. I mean, if you are elderly, with heart disease and lung disease and hypertension, and maybe one more chronic illness, couldn't a bad cold kill you? When health officials intentionally mislead the public about masks to preserve the stockpile for health care workers, I start to wonder what else are they lying to us about? Even if it is a "noble lie".

As I said, in no way do I fit into the anti-vaxxer denier category. Again, my family has been fully vaccinated and boosted and has fully followed CDC guidance. My daughter is getting her masters in Public Health. Yet, as a favorable/receptive audience, we are starting to get skeptical. So, I think it is a mistake to be completely dismissive of people that have lost some faith in government health officials and data.

Edit: Another recent example of CDC chipping away at its own credibility. Please note that the criticism is coming from health care experts not radical COVID deniers.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ifti and iOS Geek
To be honest, Americans are too individualistic with distrust of government and anything public or community.
You're being kind. Instead of "individualistic" I would say "self-centered". It has less to do with distrust of government, and more to do with arrogance, and the stupidity of assuming you're smarter than the experts. Many Americans don't get that it's not about the individual, and not just on the issue of stopping the spread of a pandemic. It's the "me generation" gone amok.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Chucks4me
You're being kind. Instead of "individualistic" I would say "self-centered". It has less to do with distrust of government, and more to do with arrogance, and the stupidity of assuming you're smarter than the experts. Many Americans don't get that it's not about the individual, and not just on the issue of stopping the spread of a pandemic. It's the "me generation" gone amok.
I disagree. I think there are plenty of smart responsible citizens that have been fully compliant with CDC guidance and fully vaccinated, but have grown skeptical of government officials and experts. See my post before yours. I think it is dismissive to just write these folks off as self-centered, and when we are dismissive of legitimate credibility concerns, we reduce the chance that government officials will learn from their mistakes. Officials and experts are not above question. Can I not question guidance that seeks to restricts school sports, band, choir and yelling on campus, while allowing 100K people to cram into a stadium for a pro football game. Does this pass a basic logic tests?

Data and guidance are only as good as the perceived credibility of the source.
 
I disagree. I think there are plenty of smart responsible citizens that have been fully compliant with CDC guidance and fully vaccinated, but have grown skeptical of government officials and experts. See my post before yours. I think it is dismissive to just write these folks off as self-centered, and when we are dismissive of legitimate credibility concerns, we reduce the chance that government officials will learn from their mistakes. Officials and experts are not above question. Can I not question guidance that seeks to restricts school sports, band, singing and yelling on campus, while allowing 100K people to cram into a stadium for a pro football game. Does this pass a basic logic tests?

Data and guidance are only as good as the perceived credibility of the source.
I do think you're on to something. As we've gotten further into this, I'm starting to see more and more stories about people who did everything "right" and "played by the rules" starting to get fed up lately. When you start to lose the people who were following along, that's the beginning of the end. I work in healthcare, so I'm not doubting or skeptical of science. What I AM skeptical of...and have been for quite a while...is responses and messaging. I fully understand and EXPECTED guidelines to change as we learned more, but the speed of these changes has been hard to keep up with. One particular guideline that I have a problem with...is the guideline regarding COVID-positive healthcare workers being allowed to work. I understand that there's a shortage in the field but this is by far one of the dumbest changes in my opinion. Especially now that there seem to be some isolated (mostly anecdotal so far, it seems...so take this with a grain of salt) stories about hospital patients catching COVID from their care teams. We all know that unvaccinated healthcare workers were either fired or are on leave. Which leaves those of us who are fully vaccinated (and in many cases boosted) as the only ones left.

For the sake of discussion, if these stories of patients catching COVID from their care teams are actually true, that means they are catching it from fully vaxxed and boosted people who are wearing masks and other PPE. If true...that doesn't instill a lot of confidence to the public eye in the ability of the vaccine OR masks to slow the spread and you could see where some skepticism comes from. I won't say outright whether or not I think firing unvaccinated healthcare workers was a good move or not, because as I am an employee who is left to pick up the slack...I have arguments to go both ways on that one...but what I WILL say is that unvaccinated workers would have had to stay home if they tested positive. Vaccinated, but positive ones are being pulled in to work. You could make the argument that the vaccinated, COVID positive nurse is actually more of a threat than an unvaccinated, COVID positive one simply because the unvaccinated one would have to stay home if they tested positive...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mainsail
Definitely spotting more and more people tired of the mask mandates - stores aren’t doing anything about it. Doesn’t stop a few fearless people from pointing them out. I keep expecting a fight to happen - lol - but the few I’ve witnessed were fairly kind - will never forget police rushing into Vons to stop a mask related fight several times last year. Definitely think people are getting tired. Most are wearing masks (myself included).

We recently ran out of those black masks we bought at Costco and ordered some of the new blue ones from Costco online. They fit better and don’t hurt the ear as bad.
 
However, it is worth noting that numerous experts do see Omnicron as a milder form of the disease, and believe this variant may well be "good news" in the longer term.....that is a few weeks or a month out.
It is almost guaranteed that successive variants will be milder. The two ways a new variant forces out the previous one is through being more highly contagious so that it can infect more hosts, and by being less deadly so that the hosts are free to infect others. The virus doesnt consciously figure this out, but natural selection will prefer these sort of characteristics over those with less. Now a very highly contagious disease might also be more deadly such as Delta was, but odds are that a less deadly one will ultimately win the competition for who can infect the most of the population.
 
For the sake of discussion, if these stories of patients catching COVID from their care teams are actually true, that means they are catching it from fully vaxxed and boosted people who are wearing masks and other PPE. If true...that doesn't instill a lot of confidence to the public eye in the ability of the vaccine OR masks to slow the spread and you could see where some skepticism comes from
I think it is Australia who have more vac'd people in hospital than unvaccinated although with high vaccination rates the odds would most likely tilt in that direction since it does not stop infection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iOS Geek
I think it is Australia who have more vac'd people in hospital than unvaccinated although with high vaccination rates the odds would most likely tilt in that direction since it does not stop infection.
Exactly, in the US, over 90% of the population over 65y.o. have been at least partially vaccinated. Clearly, the elderly are most likely to have severe symptoms. So, while I believe the vaccines are highly effective in preventing severe symptoms and death, the majority of serious cases will continue to probably be elderly, who are likely vaccinated. The CDC director recently pointed out that of the vaccinated that are hospitalized over 80% are elderly with numerous comorbidity (more than 4 chronic illness). In the US, the average life expectancy is about 77 y.o., so if you are this age and have high blood pressure, lung disease, heart disease, and some other chronic illness on top of all of that, guess what? COVID might kill you even if you are vaccinated. The problem is that this group of people are always at higher risk of dying. Even a common cold or flu could do it.
 
I think there are plenty of smart responsible citizens that have been fully compliant with CDC guidance and fully vaccinated, but have grown skeptical of government officials and experts.
I agree. You'll notice that my post says "many Americans". I didn't intend to paint everyone with the same brush. So, focusing on those you describe is being kind. There are many who don't fit into that category. But, I concede that my post was not entirely written in a way to convey the differences.
 
I agree. You'll notice that my post says "many Americans". I didn't intend to paint everyone with the same brush. So, focusing on those you describe is being kind. There are many who don't fit into that category. But, I concede that my post was not entirely written in a way to convey the differences.
Actually, I think the main theme of your original post was correct. The attitude toward vaccination exhibited by "many" Americans is very self-centered without concern for the social, common good.
 
Last edited:
I think there are plenty of smart responsible citizens that have been fully compliant with CDC guidance and fully vaccinated, but have grown skeptical of government officials and experts.
Absolutely. You can not paint all the vaccine hesitant or those to push back against mandates as just being self centered and irresponsible. Many are genuinely fearful of largely untested vaccines, long term side effects and reports of immediate and sometimes deadly reactions. Others question why alternative treatments are virtually banned and ridiculed while they are used effectively in other places. The attacks on previously respected people who have spoken out with alternative views sit very badly with many open minded people. The list goes on and on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iOS Geek
Exactly, in the US, over 90% of the population over 65y.o. have been at least partially vaccinated. Clearly, the elderly are most likely to have severe symptoms. So, while I believe the vaccines are highly effective in preventing severe symptoms and death, the majority of serious cases will continue to probably be elderly, who are likely vaccinated. The CDC director recently pointed out that of the vaccinated that are hospitalized over 80% are elderly with numerous comorbidity (more than 4 chronic illness). In the US, the average life expectancy is about 77 y.o., so if you are this age and have high blood pressure, lung disease, heart disease, and some other chronic illness on top of all of that, guess what? COVID might kill you even if you are vaccinated. The problem is that this group of people are always at higher risk of dying. Even a common cold or flu could do it.
It sounds like you are saying essentially that we are overcounting COVID deaths because some/many deaths would have occurred anyway by other means... ? The Economist magazine has been doing detailed research tracking long-term deaths before and after COVID started ("excess deaths"). They find that we are probably undercounting deaths caused by COVID (directly and indirectly):

1642523813109.png
 
Last edited:
It sounds like you are saying essentially that we are overcounting COVID deaths because some/many deaths would have occurred anyway by other means... ? The Economist magazine has been doing detailed research tracking long-term average death rates before and after COVID started ("excess deaths"). They find that we are probably undercounting deaths caused by COVID (directly and indirectly):

View attachment 1946099
Well, I was sharing the CDC directors explanation for why vaccinated people are in the hospital or maybe even dying. Her reasons were age and comorbidity.

I have never understood the excess death calculation, so I really can’t comment on that one. I will say that it is not surprising that elderly people with 4 or more comorbidity are dying.
 
Well, I was sharing the CDC directors explanation for why vaccinated people are in the hospital or maybe even dying. Her reasons were age and comorbidity.

I have never understood the excess death calculation, so I really can’t comment on that one. I will say that it is not surprising that elderly people with 4 or more comorbidity are dying.

'Excess deaths', as I understand it is based on the historical average of deaths over time. S, for a certain month, statisticians can predict how many people will die, barring any extenuating circumstances, like wars, pandemic, natural disaster. What makes any count of deaths in this country sketchy is that many states either never did release numbers, or at some point stopped reporting their numbers. States like Florida, Ohio, Montana, Wyoming, etc, have either never reported numbers, or have deliberately under-counted the number of deaths. I believe it was Florida that had a spike in flu and other lung diseases at the same point it was saying the deaths due to Covid were declining which made less than zero sense given their past performance. To get a 'real look' at the level of under reported deaths, someone would have to look at all of the reported ways people died, and see if there were spikes in other ways at the same time the Covid was killing so many.

To say that 'we don't want to report our numbers', or deliberately under reporting them should be grounds for the removal of the state's health administrators, and the state's leadership, but that never happens in this country. It seems the word 'United' has a very short reach, sadly. With states, and counties deciding what to report, and how, I have nearly zero faith in the 'official' death numbers. Well, not quite zero, as we know people have died, a lot of people, but how many? I guess at this point, another 150,000 is just a 'statistical mistake'.

Case in point, most of my relatives were lifelong smokers. On all of their death certificates, 'lifelong smoker' was not checked. So, someone doing statistics on lifelong smokers that died of cancer will be short nearly a dozen people, and likely a heck of a lot more. (My mom started smoking at 7! She stopped for a total of a month after being diagnosed with metastatic cancer. (We were all surprised she could quit that long))

People can argue the numbers all they want but they are likely severely under-counted, and deliberately so. One thing is sure: Too many have needlessly died, and it's damned sad...

I was doing 'Covid deaths in miles' a while ago, and got really depressed seeing the distances rise and rise. Wow...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard8655
People can argue the numbers all they want but they are likely severely under-counted, and deliberately so.
I am not sure how you reach that conclusion. Every person entering the hospital is tested and if they are positive, and die, then the death has been listed as a covid related death and shows up in the numbers. CDC director more or less admitted that and said they are trying to separate this better for Omicron, and Dr. Fauci also confirmed it at least in regard to children in hospital. No reason to suspect adult cases would be any different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iOS Geek
They find that we are probably undercounting deaths caused by COVID (directly and indirectly):
If you want to consider heart attacks, drug over doses, suicides, domestic and other violent deaths as being "indirectly due to C" then I would agree, but these are likely more associated with mitigation, mandated or otherwise, and overall stress rather than the disease itself.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.