Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
time for next rumor...let me get out the hat....and its......iPad will now have a port that lets you connect to your brain. Introducing the neural interface called the iThink
 
Front page of MR owned by LP much? This won't happen, and if it does that means the MBPs this week will have it. So if it did I'd be happy, but realistically come on...
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

There working on it transferring at speeds of 1tb/s? What mother flipping computer do they think will support that? When they make this, then a highspeed wireless standard will be in demand. With wireless electricity.
 
Much higher throughput (for synching, driving external monitors/high def televisions, etc.)

Putting aside the feasibility of such a thing, it wouldn't give the iPad any benefits. Despite the fact that multi-channel SSDs like those in the MBA are very fast, the low-power and cheap flash memory controllers in devices like the iPhone/iPad are slow and I wouldn't be surprised if USB 2.0 can already saturate the ability of the iPad to write to it's internal storage. So if it wouldn't speed up synching, what would be the point? Not to mention USB3 would be far more feasible and pragmatic considering most new PCs are shipping with USB3.

As to external monitors, modern ARM SoCs can already output 1080P via mini-HDMI.
 
I have to think back to the iPod (version 2?) where the initial cases revealed a camera and then when it came out the camera was gone.. could happen here as well.. it could be a proposed feature that might just vanish upon release. I'm also not sure why I would want a port.. I want wireless sync not an added port! Maybe it's a finger port... a built in finger warmer.. that would be cool :rolleyes:
 
Hey,

I might've missed something. But is there anything that tells us that it has to be a port (others suggesting it could be a microphone tells me that there is nothing that limits what the opening in the case could be for)? Can it be an IrDA? It would need to be made of transparent material, thus the opening. I'm sure an IrDA is not something as spectacular as LightPeak, but it's something.
 
This Light Peak vs. USB 3 thing is going to be like Blu-ray vs. HD DVD. And I'm fairly certain LP is going to be on the losing end. USB is already widely established, and I have yet to see some huge benefit that LP has over USB3 that would knock it off the market. The only way it has a chance is if Apple starts pumping it out in huge quantities, but even then it will likely be seen as the expensive and only slightly faster alternative to USB. That puts it at roughly the market share of firewire.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

I'm just glad we didn't get another Mac rumor. That would have Been awful.
 
And for what its worth. My money is light peak being integrated with the magsafe technology. This is an underutilized patent that apple has. They should be making all kinds of connections use the magsafe tech. Maybe even license it out so it becomes a standard, and make $$ in the process.

I agree with you. Magsafe+data connectors on idevices would only be topped by wireless charging & syncing.

I think it is important to note the mystery port is in addition to the standard dock connector. Given the iPad's power demands, it could also be a magsafe charging connection that later will support data when the Macs are ready.
 
I wonder how many haters will apologise to Arn if the iPad 2 does get Light Peak?

Haters? :rolleyes:

Will arn apologise to the "haters" (i.e. someone with a different opinion??) if there is no light peak in iPad2?? I think not!
 
So we're to expect that a miniature computer with no real use for the interconnect in the first place is going to be one of the first recipients of a just finalized standard?

How about one of the hottest and most popular computers on the planet, appealing to many different types of users, including consumers and professionals, becoming a recipient for a new technology? Seems like a great idea to me in order to spread this young protocol.
 
Seriously?

I'm sick of this ridiculous ******** that's been getting published recently by MacRumors. I should have deleted you from my RSS reader months ago.
 
LP on an iPad....

LMAO.JPG
 
Putting aside the feasibility of such a thing, it wouldn't give the iPad any benefits. Despite the fact that multi-channel SSDs like those in the MBA are very fast, the low-power and cheap flash memory controllers in devices like the iPhone/iPad are slow and I wouldn't be surprised if USB 2.0 can already saturate the ability of the iPad to write to it's internal storage. So if it wouldn't speed up synching, what would be the point? Not to mention USB3 would be far more feasible and pragmatic considering most new PCs are shipping with USB3.

As to external monitors, modern ARM SoCs can already output 1080P via mini-HDMI.

You are assuming that Apple's ASIC team didn't design their own flash memory controller.
 
How about one of the hottest and most popular computers on the planet, appealing to many different types of users, including consumers and professionals, becoming a recipient for a new technology? Seems like a great idea to me in order to spread this young protocol.

I wish any of that had even the tiniest bit of relevance to the practicality, feasibility, and likelihood of implementation with the next product revision.

Alas, it doesn't.

The ipad in its current incarnation has ZERO use for a 10gbps interconnect. The built-in storage would be lucky to read or write data at 1/5 that speed. Want to make it faster? Not in a $500 device in 2011, sorry.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.