Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Sounds interesting.
 
Could be the product spec equivalent of a trap street, a fictitious port that will not be in the finished product. I recall rumours some time back that Apple would release slightly incorrect product specs in early releases to allow them to trace leaks.

Or it could just as easily be a real debug port.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Locking out flash from iOS is not staying mainstream. Nor is dropping the optical disc drive from the MacBook Air, or using only mini displayport connectors...etc, etc, etc ...

And how are all those Flash-supporting tablets selling? Even xoom will ship without flash.
 
Apple doesn't like giving their iStuff any extra useful ports. It doesn't fit into their dated "design". Regardless, Lightpeak on a tablet makes no sense. The point of the tablet is portability. An SD slot makes more sense, but that won't happen (see above).

I think all these media outlets are scrambling to come up with rumors in the hopes they may be correct (a "told you so) and simply so they can gain more viewership and subsequently more ad revenue. Just as shady as their overlord Apple's practices..
 
And how are all those Flash-supporting tablets selling? Even xoom will ship without flash.

Xoom will have flash by the end of March. I'm not sure of your point. Considering there will be a deluge of Android tablets this year, it will strip away iPad's only hold on the tablet market. Phone sales show how robots can eat away into iPhone's sales. Also, don't use the "well the iPhone is just a single phone...", as that holds no weight. Regardless of how good or bad other phones are, people are chosing them over an iPhone. Apple needs to figure out why as it's deeper than just the variety of phones out there. The same will happen with iPad sales.

With all that said, iPad 2 won't live up to the flighty rumors perpetuated by sites like this. New consumers will buy one. Current users of iPad .95 (not really a 1.0 with its features), won't upgrade, which is a large part of the market Apple relies on.
 
Most times they release computers with new ports before peripherals. Never going to happen and is the stupidest story of I've seen on the first page in a while.
 
Would be nice but Apple has no intention of turning the iPad into a real computer.
 
First post but here goes.

I doubt it's Light Peak, USB or any other connectivity standard. The position of it, directly opposite the Apple Dock Connector would be awkward for cases when both connectors have a cable attached and the user still wanted to use the device. Apple is usually the market leader in design and I don't think they'd be so daft to overlook the usability issues that ensure when you have USB cables coming out both the top and bottom of the device...especially when used in portrait mode. If it was to have two inputs, which given APples track record with iOS is all but unlikely, then they would probably be situated near one another.

As for using the spot for IR...again I think that is very unlikely. The technology never received much use and was eventually dropped in mobile phones and I don't see why Apple would want to adopt a technology thats only real consumer use is for TV remotes. Given they can put Bluetooth in whatever devices they make, including the rumored TV they may be working on, IR would seem a backwards step for the iPad and a waste of time and money for most applications. Certainly as far as the Apple ecosystem is concerned it doesnt make much sense and I doubt they care whether your Samsung TV could use it or not.

I think it will be for something less invasive than another cable. I'm half tempted to say a second switch if they havent made their mind up on the mute or screen lock functionality, but I think Apple will look to remove physical switches and buttons, not add them.

Thanks professor
 
The only way you could believe there's even a far-fetched "snowball's chance" that this speculation is true is if you have basically zero understanding of computer engineering, component design, and simple economies of scale.

Funny I remember an engineering and production analyst saying the same about unibody construction a few years back.
 
This is the problem

that Apple is eventually going to run into. Having sold so many iDevices and created a customer base of mostly non-techies, how is Apple ever going to "sell" "Light Peak" to them?

"'Light Peak"??? What is THAT? Why do I need to spend money on THAT? Faster? I thought it was faster! No, I don't need it!"

For us, we know better, we're not the average consumer. For the millions who use iDevices, do you think anyone is going to throw money down on a new connection that may not be universal yet (meaning it will require a new computer or adapter)? I doubt it.
 
Has MR gone JV? Since when does Apple roll out high end connectors on consumer devices? Heck, for a time there Apple killed FW on MBs. When Apple does roll out Light Peak I guarantee it will be reserved for products labeled "pro". And when it does come to iOS it will be in the form of a dock connectors (remember how the 1st dock connector iPods had a cable with a USB and FW head).


that Apple is eventually going to run into. Having sold so many iDevices and created a customer base of mostly non-techies, how is Apple ever going to "sell" "Light Peak" to them?

"'Light Peak"??? What is THAT? Why do I need to spend money on THAT? Faster? I thought it was faster! No, I don't need it!"

For us, we know better, we're not the average consumer. For the millions who use iDevices, do you think anyone is going to throw money down on a new connection that may not be universal yet (meaning it will require a new computer or adapter)? I doubt it.


Huh? If that were the case how did Apple ever sell USB or FW? Remember it was the consumer iMac which Apple first introduced USB to the Mac world. And that product saved Apple from certain liquidation. But Light Peak isn't something that is "sold" to consumers, it's sold to device makers. Consumers then follow. The selling point is quite apparent too -- speed. No one likes to wait around while files are transferring, no one likes dropped frames in their video, everyone loves speed. It's how Intel made boat loads for years during the Mhz and Ghz war.
 
Last edited:
i really hope it's a USB.
It's time we are able to have a file management system on the iPad and iPhone.

I always have to laugh when people hope/want for a file management system on the iPad or iPhone.

And somehow i can't get past that only nerds are the people who would want that.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

I wonder where the other end would plug into, though? Apple would need to release Macs that include the port. Light Peak does seem awesome on the whole. It would speed up synching and backing up tremendously.

What he said.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148a Safari/6533.18.5)

At least it is a new rumor. I was getting sick of "iPad 3 will have retina display" rumors.
 
So the next rumor is that the iPad will do what the Motorola Atrix can, except it will also be the screen of the laptop. Right?
 

Attachments

  • motorola-atrix-4g.jpg
    motorola-atrix-4g.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 83
Remember, this is at the very top center of the iPad. For aesthetics, this "port" would have to be very important.
 
I think this is the most far fetched rumour ive ever heard on here! Even the chance of a USB port seems pretty slim.
 
For the millions who use iDevices, do you think anyone is going to throw money down on a new connection that may not be universal yet (meaning it will require a new computer or adapter)? I doubt it.
Those "millions who use iDevices" you mention would probably not even notice that there's a "new connection" on their new iDevice, let alone being able to evaluate the cost that might cause...
And btw: Apple did exactly that when they introduced USB for the first time on their iMacs (and survived moaning and bitching).
 
If you could make a combined LightPeak & USB socket it'd be quite appealing:

- USB, so compatible with almost everything.
- Lightpeak, for fastest possible transfers? (If a future iPad is going to have a Retina-like display, it's going to have larger high-res videos on it; and need faster data transfer).
- Data & power.
 
Just to stem the hate. This is not a rumor. It's purely speculation, which we generaly avoid, but it raises an interesting topic.

The alternative explanations are:

1. no new port. case designs and rumors are wrong
2. USB port coming to iPad
3. Another type of port?

Hey arn,

as you know, the EU demands that manufacturers implement USB-Ports so that the end-user can charge devices like the iPhone with a single charger. The iPad is based on the iPhone and iPod Touch, and it would be inefficient for Apple to support different chargers for different devices.

It is USB, not LP.

Have a great day!

;)
 
Last edited:
As there are no peripherals sporting Lightpeak connectors yet I think releasing the port on the iPad before putting it on any Mac makes sense. This would allow wide scale adoption of the protocol on a device ie: iPad and would allow 3rd parties to develop a slew of different peripherals for Lightpeak, which would then be available to be used on the next gen of Macs which will all feature Lightpeak finally.....
Bring it on.

The only problem is, that there are no semiconductors on the world market, which implement LP.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.