Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
Locking out flash from iOS is not staying mainstream. Nor is dropping the optical disc drive from the MacBook Air, or using only mini displayport connectors...etc, etc, etc ...
And how are all those Flash-supporting tablets selling? Even xoom will ship without flash.
First post but here goes.
I doubt it's Light Peak, USB or any other connectivity standard. The position of it, directly opposite the Apple Dock Connector would be awkward for cases when both connectors have a cable attached and the user still wanted to use the device. Apple is usually the market leader in design and I don't think they'd be so daft to overlook the usability issues that ensure when you have USB cables coming out both the top and bottom of the device...especially when used in portrait mode. If it was to have two inputs, which given APples track record with iOS is all but unlikely, then they would probably be situated near one another.
As for using the spot for IR...again I think that is very unlikely. The technology never received much use and was eventually dropped in mobile phones and I don't see why Apple would want to adopt a technology thats only real consumer use is for TV remotes. Given they can put Bluetooth in whatever devices they make, including the rumored TV they may be working on, IR would seem a backwards step for the iPad and a waste of time and money for most applications. Certainly as far as the Apple ecosystem is concerned it doesnt make much sense and I doubt they care whether your Samsung TV could use it or not.
I think it will be for something less invasive than another cable. I'm half tempted to say a second switch if they havent made their mind up on the mute or screen lock functionality, but I think Apple will look to remove physical switches and buttons, not add them.
The only way you could believe there's even a far-fetched "snowball's chance" that this speculation is true is if you have basically zero understanding of computer engineering, component design, and simple economies of scale.
Just to stem the hate.
arn
that Apple is eventually going to run into. Having sold so many iDevices and created a customer base of mostly non-techies, how is Apple ever going to "sell" "Light Peak" to them?
"'Light Peak"??? What is THAT? Why do I need to spend money on THAT? Faster? I thought it was faster! No, I don't need it!"
For us, we know better, we're not the average consumer. For the millions who use iDevices, do you think anyone is going to throw money down on a new connection that may not be universal yet (meaning it will require a new computer or adapter)? I doubt it.
i really hope it's a USB.
It's time we are able to have a file management system on the iPad and iPhone.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
I wonder where the other end would plug into, though? Apple would need to release Macs that include the port. Light Peak does seem awesome on the whole. It would speed up synching and backing up tremendously.
So the next rumor is that the iPad will do what the Motorola Atrix can, except it will also be the screen of the laptop. Right?
Those "millions who use iDevices" you mention would probably not even notice that there's a "new connection" on their new iDevice, let alone being able to evaluate the cost that might cause...For the millions who use iDevices, do you think anyone is going to throw money down on a new connection that may not be universal yet (meaning it will require a new computer or adapter)? I doubt it.
Just to stem the hate. This is not a rumor. It's purely speculation, which we generaly avoid, but it raises an interesting topic.
The alternative explanations are:
1. no new port. case designs and rumors are wrong
2. USB port coming to iPad
3. Another type of port?
As there are no peripherals sporting Lightpeak connectors yet I think releasing the port on the iPad before putting it on any Mac makes sense. This would allow wide scale adoption of the protocol on a device ie: iPad and would allow 3rd parties to develop a slew of different peripherals for Lightpeak, which would then be available to be used on the next gen of Macs which will all feature Lightpeak finally.....
Bring it on.