Though two things I gathered out of it, from Jaws' remarks:
1- they don't really care about environmental footprint (has not been a shocker, they wanna ship more per pallet and get a pat on the back for their higher margins being 'sustainable' for the environment) and they also don't care about being obvious about it, it's just an argumentative fall back.
If they did, they wouldn't have migrated the base iPad to USB-C now. So much for all those lightning cables in a ditch now, never mind excessive packaging for those $8 usb-c to lightning pencil adapters for it. I get that it was going to be a compromise, but it's all a facade to me. There are so many things they could be doing better if that truly is one of their driving intents (beyond the obvious of profit margin, which is fine/expected).
The more interesting one:
2- it feels entirely likely to me after watching this, that EU will get a USB-C version and other markets will remain on lightning for iPhone until Apple decides 'the next best thing' consolidated (is being port-less a workaround for being within EU compliance?)
Just like how US only (?) has eSIM only and the rest of the world has eSIM+SIM. Apple is very capable of making a specific model for a specific market and they've proven that with iPhone 14.
Also- when and if Apple moves onto another proprietary port or port-less, don't all those lightning cables effectively 'end up in a ditch' (vs. if they went USB-C as Jaws is suggesting)?