"Our mission compels us to take the same approach to privacy. For us, that means privacy cannot be a luxury good offered only to people who can afford to buy premium products and services. Privacy must be equally available to everyone in the world."
The way I read the original piece is Apple's products are luxury goods (which they are), and they have their privacy. Apple doesn't sell non-luxury products and the universe they operate in does not encompass the budget users (like buyers for the Pixel 3a) and thus couldn't provide privacy for those who couldn't afford their phones.
Basically it's more of a dig at how Apple couldn't provide that lower end market segment with a product.
Agreed. Apples products are luxury items and I’m perfectly willing to spend extra to get my hardware from a company with Apple’s attitude toward privacy. It’s well worth it in my view. As for their devices being too expensive. They still sell the iPhone 7 for $18.99 a month and if that’s too expensive iOS 13 still supports the iPhone SE and the iPhone 6/6s lines that you can still buy refurbished from Apple Authorized resellers.
Last edited: