Some council members were a little obsequious toward Steve Jobs, and instead of making frivolous requests, they should have asked the same questions of him that they would ask of any major (no-name) developer. An example is the lack of follow-through on Jobs' reply to the traffic question, that employment would only be increased by 20%. That's 20% more people on the roads.
Although this is a preliminary meeting, it is one of the city council's jobs to alert a developer to legitimate concerns over potential impacts, so the developer can address them prior to formal submittal. Many issues were addressed, but I would like to have heard how Jobs intends to address potential traffic congestion, or at least acknowledge the concern. Apple's bio-diesel busses certainly help mitigate traffic concerns, but is that enough. I was just curious, and would rather hear those issues addressed than whether they will provide free wi-fi.
By the way, I thought his answer to that was perfect. Taxes support infrastructure development, and if the city wants to supply free wi-fi infrastructure, they can find a way to do that. On the other hand, I thought Jobs' indicating he would pull out of town if the project wasn't approved is typical big-corporation bullying. Not saying it was a threat, nor am I saying that it's not an effective tactic; I just think he should have left that one for the cost-benefit write-up in the proposal instead of saying it in a public forum. This was not the meeting to argue for approval, so keep it positive. Every good developer knows this.