Dbrand's Always-On 'Aperture' Case Protects Your Vision Pro Without Interfering With Sensors and Buttons

[BelgianChoklit]

It will probably be sold by the millions 😜

even just to hit 1million sales that would mean every Vision Pro owner has to buy 200k of them 😂

 

[9081094]

even just to hit 1million sales that would mean every Vision Pro owner has to buy 200k of them 😂

That was my point 😜

 

[H2SO4]

Holy I want one of these in neon pink or green!

I never wear it outside the house. I don’t give one flyshart about looking cool. I like to be colourful and vibrant just for me.

All y’all haters are exposing your own fragility at fearing being perceived as uncool.

Are you sure they aren't expressing their opinions just like you?

 

[Sydnxt]

Protects it from what?

Dropping it bro

 

[The Clark]

Protects it from what?

Looking like a sane and rational individual.

 

[darngooddesign]

I like it.

 

[jeffpeng]

Guess I'm in the minority but I think it's quite a smart design — I imagine there are a lot of AVP users who live alone and thus don't care about EyeSight or whatever it's called, but worry about the glass getting scratched or get annoyed with having to put the cover on and off all the time.

I feel like this kinda hits it on the head. I mean there could be a less ..... creative design, yes, but it really serves this function, and I'd figure quite well.

 

[darngooddesign]

Interesting assertion

Would make sense given what an isolating and anti-social device it is

(all VR, not just AVP)

For someone who doesn't use the AVP physically around other people, it's no more isolating or anti-social than a computer or game console.

 

[pksv]

Too bad the thing it covers is useless...

*for you
here, fixed it

 

[TheOldChevy]

I first thought about a fly, but my wife said that this is a morel.

 

[oink_oink]

Looks like something a spider would crawl into and lay eggs.

 

[pksv]

So much negativity, people are completely missing the point. Creating a cover that does not have to be removed so that the sensors are exposed is one of the only possible designs. They thought primarily about functionality and it fulfills its task.

 

[Polinsky]

That’s quite a leap there. I was making fun of how ugly this thing is, and how little it should sell as a result. Sorry I didn’t spell that out in great detail in a rapid-fire joke!

Nonsense! Here is what you said, "The five Vision Pro users who also hate themselves must be ecstatic." Your intent and sentiment couldn't be more obvious. Apple hate and hatred to those who like something that others don't is now the norm on this forum and elsewhere. Any attempt you make to whitewash your statement is going to fail.

 

[Polinsky]

So much negativity, people are completely missing the point. Creating a cover that does not have to be removed so that the sensors are exposed is one of the only possible designs. They thought primarily about functionality and it fulfills its task.

It's not so much negativity as it is just pure hatred! How sad it's being tolerated. It would diminish the credibility of any forum.

 

[FlyingDutch]

Those prices 🤦🏻‍♂️
Ok, if someone could afford a Vision Pro, he could afford everything but … c’mon

 

[nathansz]

Dropping it bro

What happens if you drop it?

 

[nathansz]

So much negativity, people are completely missing the point. Creating a cover that does not have to be removed so that the sensors are exposed is one of the only possible designs. They thought primarily about functionality and it fulfills its task.

What’s its task?

 

[pksv]

What’s its task?

Protection. It's in this topic subject, description, and on the Dbrand page.

Aperture » dbrand

dbrand.com

 

[Jumpthesnark]

It's not so much negativity as it is just pure hatred! How said it's being tolerated. It would diminish the credibility of any forum.

The real joke is on all the AVP haters. MR publishes every little scrap of news they can on the AVP, knowing that some of their most dependable commenters must be the reflexive AVP haters, who will pounce on the forums and click click click. That negativity you mentioned? It's been monetized, and those haters are the product.

If it makes them feel better about themselves to come here and take pot shots at people who bought something they themselves don't like, that's fine. Nothing wrong with that - MR (like Apple) is a business and it needs to keep the lights and servers on, and it needs to keep the employees paid. Something we hopefully all agree with if we're here. But those reflexive haters should realize they're just useful tools here. And we'll see them again, in the comments section of the next post about AVP.

 

[turbineseaplane]

The real joke is on all the AVP haters.

If it makes them feel better about themselves to come here and take pot shots at people who bought something they themselves don't like, that's fine.

Agreed!
So why even mention it?

 

[wmmead]

Just what my AVP needs. More weight on the front!

 

[Polinsky]

Would make sense given what an isolating and anti-social device it is

Complete nonsense and very insulting. The AVP haters take delight in assigning all sorts of insane attributes to people and objects they don't like.

This may come as a surprise to such a narrow-minded and hateful sentiment as this, but there are many activities that could be described as having the same attributes as you seem to hate.

What about people who put on headphones, sit on their couch, close their eyes and listen to music without distraction? Are they anti social and isolating? You claim that wanting to have some time to ourselves is a bad thing. I feel sorry for those who feel the need to come here and express their hate for everything they perceive as bad. It's more a reflection of their own unsatisfying life than anything else.

 

[nathansz]

Protection. It's in this topic subject, description, and on the Dbrand page.

View attachment 2480366

Aperture » dbrand

dbrand.com

Protection from what exactly though?

 

[Polinsky]

The real joke is on all the AVP haters. MR publishes every little scrap of news they can on the AVP, knowing that some of their most dependable commenters must be the reflexive AVP haters, who will pounce on the forums and click click click. That negativity you mentioned? It's been monetized, and those haters are the product.

If it makes them feel better about themselves to come here and take pot shots at people who bought something they themselves don't like, that's fine. Nothing wrong with that - MR (like Apple) is a business and it needs to keep the lights and servers on, and it needs to keep the employees paid. Something we hopefully all agree with if we're here. But those reflexive haters should realize they're just useful tools here. And we'll see them again, in the comments section of the next post about AVP.

Very well said. For businesses/forums it's a question of money vs integrity. Integrity remains an important aspect of some forums where ignorance and hate isn't tolerated. On other forums, the negatives are encouraged to increase the click count and and generate more ad revenue, and integrity isn't even an afterthought. Some of the haters literally have an all day presence here, honing their attack methods.

 

[Polinsky]

Too bad the thing it covers is useless and overpriced though.

Useless? Really? Why the insult? Irrational sentiments like this truly reveal the character, or lack of character, of the utterer.