Just like turntables and LPsWho knew something I heard in the early 70s could catch fire in 2016.

Just like turntables and LPsWho knew something I heard in the early 70s could catch fire in 2016.
Is that why Apple had record breaking quarter after record breaking quarter?
Other rumors suggest Apple may be planning to introduce two versions of the iPhone 7 Plus - one with a single lens and a second with a dual-lens camera system that offers DSLR-like image quality with 2-3x optical zoom and improved performance in low light conditions.
Wrong. We pay the same monthly rate now as we did when we got $450 off the cost of the phone. You were right at some point, of course, but the day subsidies ended, my costs went up by $450 per line for every upgrade. Switching to one of the newer plans also doesn't reduce my cost (they're actually slightly more expensive).
I wouldn't go to a tier 2 manufacturer because I require very good manufacturer support; I can't wait a week if my device is lost/stolen/fails.
In time, mobile applications will start to reach the scale of desktop applications. I'm still on a iPhone 6 Plus with 1gb of ram, so I can't really speak for how well 2gb of ram performs, but I absolutely hate only having 1 gb of ram. Apple doesn't tell me when it's going to close my apps or browser tabs to save ram. I flip over to one app too look something up, and when I go back to my original app, I find that my phone dumped it from the ram and I lost my work. This happens on a daily basis to me. 6gb is probably overkill, but as the processing power of these phones is increasing, and screen size and resolution is getting larger, apps are going to be using more ram. I can't possibly imagine how putting too much ram is as bad as not having enough. I frequently have to borrow my wife's phone while I'm doing something on my phone to prevent myself from losing my work. I don't see that happening if I had 6gb of ram.
First: Apple needs to lower the prices 100$/100 Euros for every iPhone or iPad it makes.
Second: The RAM must start at 32GB at minimum.
Except Google has a practice of calling everything "beta" even after it is clearly not. Glass was an industrial product that Google thought had a future as a consumer product. Maybe a future version will, but not the creepy product that they introduced to a lot of fanfare in 2014. The tech writers were all gaga for it, but pretty much everyone else knew it wouldn't work.
It's a major redesign haul year, so I expect big changes from Apple. Sweeping changes: water resistance, wireless charging, new bluetooth audio design, USB Type C or some new charging method to get "quick charge" in the mix, boost in display resolutions (1080p for 4.7, QHD for 5.5), more RAM for the Plus, iOS 10 bringing swift improvements, and some sort of killer feature that's unexpected from Apple.
Are you upgrading to the iPhone 7 in September? I agree with the list of improvements you listed. I usually upgrade every year. I have the SE now, came from the 6S.
I didn't think it's possible after the sheer number but great Apple is doomed post.It's momentum, it's people replacing stuff they bought years ago and loved. Once Apple becomes known for cheap crap, the momentum works in reverse. It happened to blackberry and Apple is next.
He's dead and Apple is thriving.There's this guy called Steve Jobs that was the reason for that. Kinda like how a guy called Bill Gates was the reason for Microsoft's early success.
You may wanna look up Steve Jobs.
I start with a phone call to Apple..,It is easier to compare costs by comparing total phone+service costs for 2 years instead of comparing monthly costs.
What does Apple do differently than Samsung when your phone is lost or stolen? Does Apple offer a free replacement or discount on a new iPhone?
That is not a ram problem. That is from poor app design. Mobile apps (on both Android and iOS, even since palm OS days) are suppose to save all temporary user data when the OS shuts them down. When the app is restarted, it is suppose to load back that temp data seamlessly without input from the user, so it appears like the app never shut down in the first place.
That is not a ram problem. That is from poor app design. Mobile apps (on both Android and iOS, even since palm OS days) are suppose to save all temporary user data when the OS shuts them down. When the app is restarted, it is suppose to load back that temp data seamlessly without input from the user, so it appears like the app never shut down in the first place.
This is reminding me of 2013 when everybody wanted Apple to move to big screens, yet they used the iOS 7 overhaul to buy time by distracting people from that (in a way). Perhaps this new iPhone won't bring much in terms of design, but iOS 10 will bring massive changes?
It's a super cheap phone to make. Bragging about profit margins as a consumer would have made P.T. Barnum or Edward Bernays dance a little jig.But Apple is still earning more than 90% of all smartphone profits.
What's amazing me is that people are already dismissing the iPhone 7 and it's not even been announced let alone released, there have hardly been any leaks and the iPhone is probably not even in production yet. It's a little unfair to judge something that isn't even out yet.
The reason is Ive.
He has a certain design language and seems not to be able to change that. Everybody will get tired after years and and years to look at basically the same thing. He is now also involved in UI design and that makes things even worse. Same look outside, same look inside. For what, like 10 years?
They need to change the designer. Or challenge him. He's had it too good for too long.
Who knows about iOS 10 changes, but it's the 10th iteration, so it has to be big. People are more focused on changing the body design and internals this time by. 4.7" and 5.5" provides two comfort zones for many consumers. Add the SE and everyone has a screen size for their needs.
I held an S7 Edge in a phone store a couple of weeks ago because I was curious. It just... didn't feel quality. It might have been the fact that it was a display model, but it was a working device. It just didn't feel good in the hand.
Given that Kuo's "best case" scenario is below the low end of the range, I'm guessing it will have an impact. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I understand how financial analysis works. Kuo previously was optimistic that the iPhone 7 would boost sales and must have some inside source that the iPhone 7 is more like an "iPhone 6S-S", and so his hoped-for sales improvement will at best be delayed until 2017. The obvious risk is that Apple loses high-end customers to Samsung and Huawei and doesn't get them back in 2017.
I don't think you have all of that correct. It makes for a great headline, but that is where it stops.IMO Apple has peaked and its very slowly starting decline in all aspects (sales, brand, image, value... etc).
Apple is will be forced to start to lower their prices of the iphones (probably starting with the 7S next year), IF they want YoY growth. Just like they are lowering Apple Watch prices...
The problem is clearly that Apple is not innovating as strong as they used to do and the clearly the competition is as good if not better (often at much lower prices)! To be honest it is becoming harder and harder to bring big innovations into the smartphone market and that makes it more difficult for Apple to justify the USD 700 base price for the 16GB model.
I don't believe that Tim Cook has the same risk attitude as Steve Jobs had, when he successfully ventured into completely new product categories (like the ipod, itunes, iphone, ipad etc). And what Apple needs now is to go into a completely new product category that can change everything and make that new product a high-margin star product, while the iphone/ipads can become the lower margin (=cheaper) mass-market cash-cow products.