IMO the idea of "constant growth" is what brought the financial crises in previous years, but this is not the thread to discuss it.Whilst I understand it is about growth, I sometimes find it strange that growth seems to be the be all and end all of the whole investment thing.
Yeah, except phones aren't art. You don't replace a Picasso every three years and it's not hard for an industrial designer at Samsung, LG, or HTC to produce a phone that looks and feels just like an iPhone.
Come on! It won;t even be OLED, it will magic display or something, totally different things. Apple invented Apple's. Wrap your head around that. haha
They work hard, but they do need to do something 'magical and revolutionary' again. They are slowly becoming another run of the mill tech company.
If a company is knocking out something "magical and revolutionary" every couple of years, those products almost certainly aren't going to be "magical and revolutionary" at all.
From what I read and hear most people support Apple on this. IMO the reason why "Apple hatin'" is hanging around is because more and more people find out how huge Apple margins are (not going into the tax thing here) and feel cheated.IMO, I also think there currently is a "It's cool to hate on Apple" thing going on for some reason. I'm not sure what it is. It's more than just innovation. Given the relative ignorance of the American Public some could see Apple's defense on the FBI's assault as anti American. I completely support Apple in this effort. However, I do hear, see, and feel a change. It's unnerving.
This exact thing is said about the automotive sales industry. The price is the price; it's a simple concept. Let 'em go on the competition and show Apple.From what I read and hear most people support Apple on this. IMO the reason why "Apple hatin'" is hanging around is because more and more people find out how huge Apple margins are (not going into the tax thing here) and feel cheated.
Thanks for the link. I'll have to check his methodology in a couple days when the post leaves the paywall. I'm interested in his low rating because it counters my own observations of Kuo's accuracy since 2012. As a scientist I'm convinced by data so if Dewitt's data pan out (assuming he's upfront about his sources and methods), I'll gladly give up my elevated opinion of Kuo and put him back down with the other analysts.Phillip Elmer Dewitt:
http://ped30.com/2016/04/24/apple-ming-chi-kuo-truthiness/
After I posted he changed it to 44%.
I understand that's how it works - I just think its crazy that when a company is as successful as Apple has been over a prolonged period of time it throws up a situation that appears so counter intuitive.
A company shifting 200m units and making an annual profit of $200bn may appear a better investment prospect than a company shifting 20m units and making an annual profit of $2bn.
Yes, but I don't think that there is "an Apple of cars" – a company consistently selling the most cars, with their own... um... operating system analogy here..., with profit margins of over 60%.This exact thing is said about the automotive sales industry. The price is the price; it's a simple concept. Let 'em go on the competition and show Apple.
Well, PED checked his predictions and came up with 41%. He adjusted it up to 44% after I posted.
[doublepost=1461581136][/doublepost]
Wows!
Thanks for the link. I'll have to check his methodology in a couple days when the post leaves the paywall. I'm interested in his low rating because it counters my own observations of Kuo's accuracy since 2012. As a scientist I'm convinced by data so if Dewitt's data pan out (assuming he's upfront about his sources and methods), I'll gladly give up my elevated opinion of Kuo and put him back down with the other analysts.
From what I read and hear most people support Apple on this. IMO the reason why "Apple hatin'" is hanging around is because more and more people find out how huge Apple margins are (not going into the tax thing here) and feel cheated.
There is also a good amount of pent up demand for a smaller phone with all the features of the top-of-the-range phones, and the 5se is now filling that demand.
Have you ever taken an iPhone 4 apart with an engineering appreciation for how it is created in a logical, modular fashion, with the logic board solder mask and ribbon cables all colour matched matte black, laid out in a neat, uniform and logical manner, how the band around the side is THICK, SOLID stainless steel, how the corners and sides of the display are anchored to the inside of the band with precision screws and washers, how the insulation material in the antenna band gaps is precision made so that running a finger over it reveals NO misalignment between the insulator and the steel, such that it is a continuous, smooth and uniform surface, how ALL of the screws are still machine screws that lock into machined threads in the steel chassis, and not self-tapping screws that rely on being screwed into soft, weak plastic. Notice how ALL the ribbon cable connectors are held down with precision made stainless steel clamps, held captive with securely located screws, again, mounted into the steel.
Sadly not stainless steel since the 4S.