Squozen said:
That would explain why I could crash our OS 9 machines in 5 minutes yet have no problems with Win XP. Oh wait, no it wouldn't, you're talking bollocks.
OS 9's UI was very usable, but it was too unstable for that to matter. W2k/XP is usually the other way around (assuming no spyware/viruses/trojans/bad device drivers/etc).
Yeah, I'm talking bollocks.
🙄 No, wait, I actually USED it. It came on my Pismo, and I used 9 up until Panther (about a year ago). I bought OS 10.1 & 10.2, and uninstalled them both and went back to 9. I never had crashes, lock-ups, etc.
But then, I used my machine for work, I didn't load a ton of themes (Kaleidescope, remember that?), extensions, etc on it. If Adobe, Deneba, or M$ (shudder) didn't install the extension, it wasn't on my computer, and it didn't crash.
Sorry your experience was different, but to say I'm talking "bollocks" when I've been there and done that just ain't right.
And XP isn't stable...at all. I have a spyware/virii-free XP box that I use for UT2004 that BSOD's quite often. I bought it to do ArcView on, but have given up on XP and am running ArcView, on the rare occasion that I need it, in RealPC (remember that one?) running Win95, under Classic.