Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
lokey said:
Honestly, I say just play a quick 30 second clip from one of Steve's keynotes. Those are always enough to make me want to go out and buy the newest Apple product. 😀

Are you mad! Who knows what would happen to this nation if Apple unleashed the full force of Steve's RDF on prime time. 😱
 
homerjward said:
is that the one with the guy talking about his kid being interested in space so they have a telescope hooked up to his computer? i actually like that one 😱 before i saw the lappy, then the "windows xp" i thought it might be an apple ad 😱😱😎

Yeah, that's the one I've seen most often. They also have another one where they have a bunch of people saying "Start..." in different languages. So, that's 2 down. 49 to go...
 
One of my favorite ads was "Curveball". A boy asks his father why a curve ball curves. The father starts talking about spin and he's twisting his wrist and twisting his ideas. Then he takes the boy over to a Macintosh and they find the support information the dad needs to help him teach his son. It was warm, it was realistic, it was not condescending. They had another in the series where a girl asked her mother about how fish breathe.

I think that kind of approach, showing the Mac as a real world tool doing real things for real people (not rock stars or Einsteins) could get the message across.

They could do a series of them.

Small business person relying on the Mac to "just work" and do simple email, web support.

Teacher doing grading, making up tests, preparing presentations, etc. without a hitch.

A salesman making a book with iPhoto to give to a customer as a follow up to a presentation.

Sell the reliability, the breadth of features, the ease of tying those features together, the support from Applecare, the support from the genius bar. It's not just that you could possibly make a DVD (if the stars align properly) but that you can do so reliably and with relatively little effort.

The genius bar is a powerful plus for Apple. I've heard numerous stories of windows users paying big bucks to have their computers cleaned of malware or other problems. You can schedule an appointment with the local genius and solve lots of problems for no charge.
 
neutrino23 said:
You can schedule an appointment with the local genius and solve lots of problems for no charge.
Assuming you live close to an Apple store. My closest is one hour away.... by airplane mind you. I wished Apple would open up stores here in europe. (one does not count)
 
CubaTBird said:
apple should kick it old school, like they did with those old pc vs mac commercials.. i can just see it.. "want a computer without the spyware and adware? the choice is clear... macintosh" that would rock.. 🙂


Yah and next week the first spyware apps for Mac shows up. 🙄
 
MacPhreak said:
OS 9, as bad as it was, was still better than XP, IMHO, as far as reliability and usability goes.
QUOTE]


LOL. I would debate that point into the ground. usability is subjective. reliability? Hell NO. Sorry but my XP system has been up for months. My 2K system has been up for.....damn. No idea. I think it was shut down when I went on vacation in October. 😱

OS 9 did NOT have that kind of uptime and did not have protected memory which is a mandate for ANY current OS. Sorry but if you want to liken it to something how about OS 9 to 9x and OS X to NT/2K/XP.
 
Jalexster said:
Dear Apple:

Please do not advertise Macs! I would much prefer it if we stayed under the radar, out of sight of the virus, malware and everything else makers! We are safe because of a good OS, but also because of obscurity! Don't kill our perfect world, by inviting viruses, malware, and a torrent a new users who don't understand anything, and who will flood our forum, and reduce it to non-stop flaming, like on PC-centric forums!
I don't really think one advertising campaign is going to make THAT much of a difference in Apple's market share. Perfect World? Where? I think you're over-reacting a bit.
 
SiliconAddict said:
Yah and next week the first spyware apps for Mac shows up. 🙄
Exactly, this isn't a good way to sell the Mac, because you know that as soon as that kind of commercial is released, a major virus will start spreading among Mac users, many of which are not using virus-protection software. This will make headline news because of the ads and destroy the Mac's reputation instantly. And you know MS will be taking advantage of that kind of situation if it occurred. Not a good marketing strategy.
 
All I can say is, it's about time Apple!! 🙂

If it has flashy silhouettes, it will flop. Thankfully it appears to be taking a note from the switch campaign. Im sorry, what was the reason they stopped those ads?
 
Shameless plug here, but these are some adverts 'iMade' (pieced together) late last year; these are the sort of adverts Apple NEEDS to be doing!

Born to Reign I used this music for the words, just listen to them, they are so powerful

iMac + iPhoto We've seen iPod + iTunes adverts, now we need to show off iPhoto

P.s. I take NO credit for any of the images used, I just ripped them from the iMac promo video(s), but I DID piece the good bits together and fit music.
 
rockthecasbah said:
All I can say is, it's about time Apple!! 🙂

If it has flashy silhouettes, it will flop. Thankfully it appears to be taking a note from the switch campaign. Im sorry, what was the reason they stopped those ads?

I wish that I knew. Apple never has advertised that much. The iPod ads are the most that I have ever noticed. I don't like Windows, but I'm always impressed when I see one.
 
rockthecasbah said:
Thankfully it appears to be taking a note from the switch campaign. Im sorry, what was the reason they stopped those ads?

Read the mulitple previous posts in this thread to find out why they were judged so ineffective by many people. Apple will have to put a serious twist on the "switcher" ads for them to be more successful this time around. 😎
 
Dm84 said:
OS 9 sucked. OS 9 was the reason many people in their late teens and 20's never chose the Mac platform in the first place. Without OS X, I wouldn't have switched to the Mac platform, as any version of Windows after 3.1 was superior to Macs until OS X was released. Coincidentally, the iPod was released in 2001, the same year as OS X. Apple would've gone down the crapper if they hadn't came out with the iPod and OS X. Unfortunately at my school newspaper, I still have 2 iMacs running OS 9 with 768 MB of RAM; they're the most unreliable pieces of crap ever made. The other 2 machines I have at the office (2 Powermac G4 dual 867's) running Jaguar are so much better.

If using the iPod in ads for OS X is what it takes to get people to switch to the Mac platform, then so be it.

Slow down there, if you think Win 3.1 - Win98 was ever better than OS9 you need to stop drinking. OS 9 ruled in its day: it was very stable—if you knew how to maintain it—fast, and was much easier to use than Win98 (anything before that is a bad joke).
However, OS 9 is a legacy OS and was rightfully buried by Jobs when it was time, OSX is a much better system and I don't miss OS9 at all, but give the dead some respect.
Incidentally, those iMacs can run Jaguar with aplomb, you might want to try it.
 
MacPhreak said:
Many, many people on here will disagree with your last statement, especially since Windows 3.1 wasn't an operating system, it was a shell. You must not have used WinME. OS 9, as bad as it was, was still better than XP, IMHO, as far as reliability and usability goes.

Now, I just wrote a quick post defending OS9, but as much as I loved OS9 at the time, as smooth and easily as it seemed, OS9 cannot hold a candle to XP's reliability. Remember extensions? Seriously, OS9 was great until the later iterations of Win2k and even then it was starting to show its age.

SiliconAddict said:
LOL. I would debate that point into the ground. usability is subjective. reliability? Hell NO. Sorry but my XP system has been up for months. My 2K system has been up for.....damn. No idea. I think it was shut down when I went on vacation in October. 😱

OS 9 did NOT have that kind of uptime and did not have protected memory which is a mandate for ANY current OS. Sorry but if you want to liken it to something how about OS 9 to 9x and OS X to NT/2K/XP.

While OS9 is not as powerful or stable as OSX or even WinXP, it was perfectly stable if you knew what you were doing—not as Apple-like as it should have been—and could run for months while being used to do hard-core graphic design. It was a good system, but was tempermental, and you're right it did lack at lot of important technologies, but it was a good system for the time.
I think you're comparison OS9 = Win98, OSX=XP is probably about right. However, I would like to point out that networking two Win2k/NT machines together still takes more work than setting up two OS9 machines, and the internet utilities were actually very well-designed. OS9 deserves a better legacy than what many people here are giving it, it was a good OS for the time.
 
Mac advert idea

I have not had time to read the whole thread so I may just be repeating an idea.

I was thinking earlier about an effective idea for potential switchers.

Why not have two computers on screen, one a windows PC massive box, and the other a mac mini. Both side by side. Then with some text over the top explaining that they both have the same size hard drive and completely the same data.

"We took two computers with the same hard disks and same data and did the same search on both."

Then zoom in on both of them searching and watch the mac mini do it quickly while windows struggles.

Then zoom in on a close up of the mac mini.

"OS X Tiger with Spotlight on the new mac mini - Think Different"

This kind of thing would highlight how macs can do things better than pcs can, expecially for low end users. And the mac mini is an ideal advert for potential switchers.
 
Apple just needs to show people, not have others tell them. That's why I hope they don't do "Switch 2" here.

Showing people how that beautiful iMac G5 can find their files with the type of a single phrase, will securely protect them from the bad guys on the internet, and is extremely easy to use with no more headaches is enough to convince people. Like I said, it just has to be the same jaw-dropping experience as getting to play with your first Mac in the Apple store. Show the thing off! I don't understand why Apple's holding back on this. The look and feel of OS X decimates Windows, the features crush it ("Search your computer like you search the web, thanks to Spotlight"), and the computers themselves take up much less space and are cheap (Mac mini).

But instead of all that, if they give us, "I'm a random dork from so-and-so, and I really like Macs," it won't have the same effect. 🙂
 
If they do not show video of Mac OS in action, it will be just another switcher commercial. I don't know what keeps Apple from showing off their OS. It should not be up to the users to advertise for Apple.
 
Can Confirm

My wife works with a family which was flown out to California to addition for an ad. They were selected from the registration information because they were exclusive Windows users and then bought an iPod. They liked the iPod so much they went out and bought a Mac Mini and now do everything with their Mac (.mac, iTunes, ect...).

Geoff
 
hulugu said:
OS9 deserves a better legacy than what many people here are giving it, it was a good OS for the time.
I agree. I used OS9 until 6 months ago when I finally made the leap to OSX. I could have easily continued with OS9 if necessary.
 
Hi all. First time posting here. I've been silently watching for a couple months now. I saw this and really thought I ought to contribute.

About a month ago, I saw on Apple's website that they were looking for people who "Bought an iPod, then got a Mac?" So I told them my story.

In a nutshell, I bought a iPod because I thought they were the coolest thing on earth. I had used iTunes on my PC before I bought the iPod for a couple months. I liked iTunes, and that also influenced my descision for the iPod. A couple months after the iPod purchase, I happened to be in the market for a new computer. Because I heard from friends (even PC users) that they were really nice, and after liking the iPod, I bought a eMac 1GHz G4 512MB RAM CD-ROM for $650 off of an online authorized reseller. I now love the Mac and my iPod.

Anyway, I submitted that story to Apple and soon forgot about it. About a week later, Apple e-mailed me and wanted to talk to me on the phone. After getting details set up, they called me and talked to me for about 15 minutes about what I do with it, how often, et cetera. I think they really liked it. Later that week, they e-mailed me asking for a short video. When I explained that I didn't have an accessible camcorder, they asked for some pictures of me with my iPod. I then explained that I didn't have a digital camera either. When I asked what this was for, they told me it was just to know their audience - market research. After all, I have been getting all of the e-mails from "market_research@mac.com". I was then disinterested. I believed that I was going to be part of some huge advertising campaign or switch webpage. I told them "Hey, I saw some of your switch stories online. You can use me as one of those if you want." They said no, they just wanted market research.

Skip ahead a month. I go online and see this topic. So I e-mailed them back yesterday and told them that I recently acquired a digital camera and could now send them some pictures. I was very insistent that they want them. I'm still waiting for a reply. They were pretty quick usually, sometimes responding withing an hour, so I don't really know...

Thanks in advance for the welcome to the MacRumors community.
 
Squozen said:
That would explain why I could crash our OS 9 machines in 5 minutes yet have no problems with Win XP. Oh wait, no it wouldn't, you're talking bollocks.

OS 9's UI was very usable, but it was too unstable for that to matter. W2k/XP is usually the other way around (assuming no spyware/viruses/trojans/bad device drivers/etc).

Yeah, I'm talking bollocks. 🙄 No, wait, I actually USED it. It came on my Pismo, and I used 9 up until Panther (about a year ago). I bought OS 10.1 & 10.2, and uninstalled them both and went back to 9. I never had crashes, lock-ups, etc.

But then, I used my machine for work, I didn't load a ton of themes (Kaleidescope, remember that?), extensions, etc on it. If Adobe, Deneba, or M$ (shudder) didn't install the extension, it wasn't on my computer, and it didn't crash.

Sorry your experience was different, but to say I'm talking "bollocks" when I've been there and done that just ain't right.

And XP isn't stable...at all. I have a spyware/virii-free XP box that I use for UT2004 that BSOD's quite often. I bought it to do ArcView on, but have given up on XP and am running ArcView, on the rare occasion that I need it, in RealPC (remember that one?) running Win95, under Classic.
 
believe it or not, wee only need to show them we can right click with a mouse,

it freaks me out that pc users don't know
 
Switching can be scary. It involves giving up something that you are already familiar with. It involves moving out of a psychological comfort zone, and many people just won't do that, no matter how bad things happen to be.

Adding is a lot less scary. You get to keep everything that you already have, but explore new possibilities without fear of losing that which is familiar.

Obtaining an iPod does not require one to stop using every other music playing device that they might have acquired over a lifetime. Likewise, obtaining a new Macintosh computer running Tiger, iLife and iWork does not require one to swear allegiance to Steve, thus forsaking all others forever and ever, Amen.

(You may end up wanting to do that after a while, but maybe not. In any case it is optional, not required.)

The point is that Apple needs to show people what they are missing, foster an awareness and desire for their solution and assuage people's fears regarding the uncertainty of taking such a step.

Make your next computer a Mac
 
SiliconAddict said:
MacPhreak said:
OS 9, as bad as it was, was still better than XP, IMHO, as far as reliability and usability goes.
QUOTE]


LOL. I would debate that point into the ground. usability is subjective. reliability? Hell NO. Sorry but my XP system has been up for months. My 2K system has been up for.....damn. No idea. I think it was shut down when I went on vacation in October. 😱

OS 9 did NOT have that kind of uptime and did not have protected memory which is a mandate for ANY current OS. Sorry but if you want to liken it to something how about OS 9 to 9x and OS X to NT/2K/XP.

well dude, good for you, but my story with the Xp pc i owned was far from that, it was a real nightmare, it always crashed and freezed, i had it .

Meanwhile my Macs are always working , except for the one that was stolen from me , my child, i hope she is fine thou...
 
Just like the original G5 ads
I think apple could generate alot of FREE XTRA PR and BUZZ by bragging about the recent MOTHER_OF_ALL WAIT 10 MONTHS SUCKER A$$KICKING 200Mhz upgrades on the UBER HI_END WROTE _THE_BOOK on personal SUPERCOMPUTING POWER_MAC G5 2.7 WOOOOOHOOOOOOO!!!!!!

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!!!!
WE'LL EVEN THROW IN A STOP GAP QUESTIONABLE WATER COOLING SYSTEM AT NO EXTRA CHARGE!! AND worried about those legacy hard drives and peripherals?? NO PROBLEM WE'RE KEEPING PCI & PCIx just the way you remember it.With all the money you'll save on fancy PCIe devices and cards and fancy new DDR3 memory you can buy an XBOX 360 for some REAL graphics entertainment.
GIDDEE UP, sign me up, where's my Fu@&ing credit card??.......

Can I get one of them cool little halos, too??
...and hand me my G5, I got a bunch of papers blowin around my desk.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.