I would hope it was, all the reviews I've seen thus far for IVB chips are pretty bad as far as performance goes. (much less than expected)
You're clearly not familiar with Intel's Tick-Tock development.
I would hope it was, all the reviews I've seen thus far for IVB chips are pretty bad as far as performance goes. (much less than expected)
wow, thats loads of not supported graphics cards.........from most macs owned!
![]()
Now Mac Enthusiasts everywhere can be disappointed by the ending!![]()
Hmm, does this mean the version I bought on Steam will now be Mac enabled? Not that I'd want to play it on my Mac as opposed to my PC, but it's always nice to have the option.
What was wrong with the ending? (I actually don't think I remember it very well - remind me(but don't forget to white-out your reply so you don't spoil it for people)!) Wasn't a patch on the ME3 ending, that's for sure...
I have the opposite experience. I have a mid-2011 iMac 3.4GHz with 6970M card too, and the game is very fast with almost all eyecandy on @ 2560x1440.Finally the game is out for mac I thought. I downloaded it fired it up changed the resolution to 2560x1440, andturnedup the iCandy. The game is unbearable to play. I turned every iCandy off but kept my resolution. The game is still unplayable. I take the resolution down to 1920x1080, the game is now possible to play through but just barly and not giving a good gameplay feel. The game is running better in parallels with windows 7 than native macport.
I have the high end iMac with the AMD 6970 card so this level of performance is in no way acceptable. I am sure there is only a bug somewhere but it needs to be found and squashed. Cause I don't pay 50$ for a game I would call unplayable. Is there any way to display frame rate?
Nilka.
You could play DX: HR on OnLive even if you have Nvidia 320M, Intel HD 3000, or any other video card.The game weighs in at more than 15 gigabytes and does not support any of the following graphics cards: ATI X1xxx series, ATI HD2xxx series, NVIDIA 9400, NVIDIA 7xxx series, NVIDIA 320M, Intel HD3000 and Intel GMA series.
Eh, 7 or 8 months.Plus you could've been playing it since like a year ago...
Sounds like you have something running that shouldn't be. Yes it runs hot in certain games and FCPX. But other than that the discrete graphics should be barely used. I have excellent battery life until Flash activates or I use one of the above apps.
No, Feral games will never be on Steam for financial reasons.
You'd think as a prequel game it would need less computing and graphical power than the original Deus Ex.......
In all seriousness if this game can run on the out dated hardware in a 360 then there is no reason why it should run on any Mac that is made after 2007.
Finally the game is out for mac I thought. I downloaded it fired it up changed the resolution to 2560x1440, andturnedup the iCandy. The game is unbearable to play. I turned every iCandy off but kept my resolution. The game is still unplayable. I take the resolution down to 1920x1080, the game is now possible to play through but just barly and not giving a good gameplay feel. The game is running better in parallels with windows 7 than native macport.
I have the high end iMac with the AMD 6970 card so this level of performance is in no way acceptable. I am sure there is only a bug somewhere but it needs to be found and squashed. Cause I don't pay 50$ for a game I would call unplayable. Is there any way to display frame rate?
Nilka.
I have the opposite experience. I have a mid-2011 iMac 3.4GHz with 6970M card too, and the game is very fast with almost all eyecandy on @ 2560x1440.
Runs better than my Windows version on Bootcamp.
And once again Steam users on Mac are screwed over.
Why the hell can't these companies get the licensing worked out?
Wow. Those are some high requirements for a game I'd say wasn't that graphically advanced.