Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Maybe someone should make a fake money printing app: just make sure to put "Mock bill by FakeMoney.com" in very tiny letters like this one.

Then await the rejection (may be delivered by the FBI) and complain bitterly about it - bonus, free publicity for your website and front page news on several websites.

Great analogy.
 
People are glossing over the fact that using the app to print out a fake id is actually illegal. It doesn't matter whether you could use it to get on a plane or whether you could fool someone used to looking at IDs. It's illegal to use and that is enough reason for Apple to pull it. (And it's not like being unable to use this joke app is a great loss).

It's also illegal to drive drunk, so we should take away alcohol (this was actually tried about 80 years ago...). It's illegal to shoot someone, better take guns away. It's also illegal to try to kill you with a knife, bat, car etc.. Should we take away anything and everything that makes it possible to break a law? C'mon man use your head.

Perhaps we should take away every apple device that exists, because some how, some way, you can break a law with it.:rolleyes:
 
Why didn't the Senator have the courtesy to contact the developer first? This is like someone calling my mom to complain about me. I'm 45.

It's more like a friend calling your mom to complain that you still have his Van Halen bootlegs!

Seriously why should Apple spend a minute of their time fighting for the developer. Regardless if your app is free or making Apple 30% of $2000.00.

If EA's Madden 2012 infringed on any laws I doubt John Madden would call his local Target so they pull it off the shelf. It's an issue between the developer and the complainer.
 
It's more like a friend calling your mom to complain that you still have his Van Halen bootlegs!

Seriously why should Apple spend a minute of their time fighting for the developer. Regardless if your app is free or making Apple 30% of $2000.00.

If EA's Madden 2012 infringed on any laws I doubt John Madden would call his local Target so they pull it off the shelf. It's an issue between the developer and the complainer.

What usually happens is that if Apple gets a legal complain of an app, that Apple forwards it to the Developer (since the Developer is responsible for that stuff) and attaches a deadline to respond to it and only if not respond to or otherwise resolved it is getting pulled. That said, I don't know if that original complain was forwarded to the Developer (he claims not) - so not sure why it didn't go the usual route.
 
Publicity hungry Senator

Senator (what's his name again)? obviously wants a publicity stunt. Otherwise, no one knows him. Scratch that, no one cares.
 
not illegal

People are glossing over the fact that using the app to print out a fake id is actually illegal. It doesn't matter whether you could use it to get on a plane or whether you could fool someone used to looking at IDs. It's illegal to use and that is enough reason for Apple to pull it. (And it's not like being unable to use this joke app is a great loss).


I do sometimes think Apple draws the line in the wrong place for some apps, but drawing the line at illegal apps (or DWI checkpoint apps) seems a good place to draw it.


Photoshop is also much more expensive, is complicated to learn how to use, and doesn't come with a database of state driver's license designs.

Is Monopoly money illegal? No. It's illegal to use a true fake ID for the purpose of identification, it's not illegal to play with pretend IDs for fun. This app doesn't even come close to meeting the minimum criteria for creating a document that would even plausibly pass as the real thing. Are you going to start sending the authorities over to arrest my kids for making their play "sheriff" badges? Apparently you and the dear Senator need to get a life.
 
Maybe someone should make a fake money printing app: just make sure to put "Mock bill by FakeMoney.com" in very tiny letters like this one.

The "very tiny letters" is what gets you into trouble. Big letters solves the problem.

The example image to the story has some small "mock" lettering. If the image had said "Mock Drivers License" instead of just "Drivers License" then this likely wouldn't be a pulled app.

If substantially fewer people are going to buy it if "mock disclaimers" are of equal size then it is rather disingenuous to say that buyers of the app are not putting a high value on being passable as a real drivers license.

If you makes something that very closely mimics US currency except for some very small flaws... expect a visit from the Secret Service at some point. "Joke" money all have prominent "this is not legal tender" notices. You can't make it small or put in subtle flaws and then claim to get a pass on counterfeiting because the copy is slightly flawed.
 
Last edited:
Again Senators need to learn what their jobs are and Bob is an idiot who should be fired.

Thank you.

Its up to apple to PROVE the app has broken the law is some jurisdiction. They have not, and therefore should not be able to invoke that section of their TOS.

It seems to me that Apple is reaching for some legitimate reason, and likely pulled it without one to justify the action.
 
1) The developer who could now be unemployed, and his/her family.
2) All other developers and dev companies for reasons mentioned by 0815 above.

Those are the risks you take as an "entrepreneur." Them's the breaks. Apple doesn't owe anyone a living.
 
Considering that many employees don't check to make sure the ID is actually valid, it IS a threat.
 
Considering that many employees don't check to make sure the ID is actually valid, it IS a threat.

Many employees don't check valid IDs to even see if the picture matches the face of the person presenting the ID. You can't legislate away stupidity. This app is not a threat.

If you wan't someone to manage every aspect of your life, go move to North Korea, and leave those of us who actually like freedom, even with all its potential pitfalls.
 
1) The developer who could now be unemployed, and his/her family.
2) All other developers and dev companies for reasons mentioned by 0815 above.

Any developer that bet their livelihood on an ultimately useless app like this was asking for it, especially given Apple's behavior towards legally questionable apps in the past.
 
Senator (what's his name again)? obviously wants a publicity stunt. Otherwise, no one knows him. Scratch that, no one cares.
Everyone gets their 15 minutes of fame, this must be his.

With that said I think:

1. He needs to get laid

2. He needs to actually do Senator stuff

3. He needs to get laid
 
Considering that many employees don't check to make sure the ID is actually valid, it IS a threat.

You mean they don't ask for one ... or they can't tell that it is a low quality ink jet print out with all the holograms and security features missing and not sealed in plastic? ... get real, if they really look at it or touch, it jumps in their face that it is fake ... if they don't really look at it, well, that is a problem that is not solved by banning this app.
 
As ridiculous as this is, the support in Congress for SOPA and PROTECT IP is a much more serious problem right now.
Indeed. If they pass it could destroy the internet as we know it.

Photoshop is also much more expensive, is complicated to learn how to use, and doesn't come with a database of state driver's license designs.

Which is why many people pirate photoshop. There are also free alternatives which could get the job done.

I'm fairly sure there are templates and tutorials out there.
 
Last edited:
Is Monopoly money illegal? No. It's illegal to use a true fake ID for the purpose of identification, it's not illegal to play with pretend IDs for fun. This app doesn't even come close to meeting the minimum criteria for creating a document that would even plausibly pass as the real thing. Are you going to start sending the authorities over to arrest my kids for making their play "sheriff" badges? Apparently you and the dear Senator need to get a life.

Monopoly money is legal because it in no way includes words such as "United States of America", "Federal Reserve Note", "United States Treasury", etc.

The same is true with your kids fake sheriff badges.

However, this software includes the words "State of Arizona", "Commonwealth of Virginia", etc. in an official looking way.

The U.S. law prohibits any form of duplication of its money no matter how fake it looks.

State laws are different so I can only speak for Ohio. It is illegal to include the words "The State of Ohio" on any document or business name if it is done to look official, even as a joke. Thus even without printing the output of this app is in violation of Ohio law.

Apple was right.
 
BTW

Most (All?) states are getting very artistic with their driver's licenses. Look at the fancy fonts and backgrounds.

Most (All?) of these state designs are COPYRIGHTED materials. Thus there is probably of very serious copyright violation with this app.
 
Last edited:
The U.S. law prohibits any form of duplication of its money no matter how fake it looks.

Sorry, but you're wrong. Laws have *very* specific proscriptions and criteria for determining whether or not a given pictorial representation of currency is considered counterfeit, or just fake. For example, I could *legally* photocopy or scan and print $50 bills all day long (even double-sided) so long as the image is at least 150% normal size.
 
Maybe the government should ban Photoshop, too. Last I checked that made much more convincing fakes.

This is exactly why our government can't get anything done, because they spend too much time worrying about things that they ought not worry about. I think the larger problem than an iOS app that creates OBVIOUSLY fake IDs is the fact that some people selling alcohol and tobacco are stupid enough to accept a photo of an ID on an iPhone. These are way more fake looking than your average fake ID.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.