The most important measure for one-handed operation is width and height (though it depends on where the height was increased).Except it isn't. It looks the same size but the X/Xs/11 Pro is larger in every dimension. The 11 Pro is now 22.5% larger by volume and 27% heavier than the 8 and a whopping 30.4% larger by volume and 45.7% heavier than the 6 was (since the 6s was larger than the 6, and the 8 was larger than the 6s). it makes a huge difference in one handed operation.
iPhone 6: 67.0 x 138.1 mm
iPhone 6s: 67.1 x 138.1 mm
iPhone 7: 67.1 x 138.3 mm
iPhone 8: 67.3 x 138.4 mm
That increase is imperceptible. What might be perceptible is the increase in thickness: 6.9 to 7.1 to 7.3 mm. What probably is perceptible is the increase in weight: 129 to 143 to 138 to 148 g.
It’s the iPhone X/Xs where the actual jump happens: 70.9 x 143.6 x 7.7 mm and 174 g (plus the screen goes to the top of the device). The iPhone 11 extends on that in regard to mainly thickness and weight (71.4 x 144 x 8.1 mm and 188 g).
The ~4 mm increase in width (8 vs 11 Pro) and the much taller screen do affect one-handed usage noticeably.
[automerge]1577981757[/automerge]
Really? The whole idea? Recycling an older design to save money, which also protected the status of the 6/7 range by clearly being identifiable as looking like an older gen iPhone, plus other lesser components like the FaceTime camera which were matched by a significantly lower price weren’t part of the concept of the iPhone SE?How would a 5.5" or 6.1" iPhone qualify as an "SE"? The whole idea behind the SE was a smaller form factor with current tech for those of us who don't want phablets in our pockets.
Last edited: