Thank you. I’ll probably deal with more heat with the M5 as that’s the final step on the 3nm cycle, and it has a quite high clockspeed, but… at least it’s a step where Apple Silicon design team decided to increase the cache memory, just like they did on the M2, and the M2 turned out to be a fantastic SoC. Fingers crossed that the M5 receives an awesome support going forward!I think you made the smart financial choice buying the Air today.
I am super happy with my 24/1 M5 15 inch MacBook Air.
Glad I made the move while it made sense to from anemic 8/256 M2. I should be set.
Also bothered me that my iPad Pro was more capable than my Mac, notwithstanding iPadOS 😛 (M4 16/1)
Unfortunately, the chip wasn't that great. At least an M3 chip is required for getting full AI functionality.… the M2 turned out to be a fantastic SoC…
![]()
Apple raises prices on Macs, iPads, and more by hundreds of dollars
RAMageddon strikes again.www.theverge.com
Price increases are here
+200 for base model MacBook airs
+300/500 for 14 and 16 inch pro
Ram jumps are +200 still but 512 to 1tb is now +300 instead of +200. You got your new laptop just in the nick of time
View attachment 2640867
But you had already bought it, right?My configuration went up $300. That blows.
But you had already bought it, right?
Yeah, the 1TB/24GB at least here in Europe is the one that got the most hefty price increase. It was a great value so congrats @thadoggfather @1BadManVan @dizmonk
I think that having purchased the 32GB of RAM model in my case has its bright side: I have almost a month (until I receive it) to think about keeping it or not, I’ll try to get the back to school gift (there may be a chance), the warranty will start one month later…
And if Apple releases an M7 MacBook Air in spring, I’ll be able to see if storage and RAM prices go crazy, and decide whether to sell my M5 MBA or not.
I would have bought the 1TB/24GB machine, but it wouldn’t have given me this extra month to plan what to do…
I’m also a newbie, @Geekett . I’ve asked here and other forums regarding local LLMs, I’ve even asked other LLMs about this, and honestly all the replies fall in either of two categories: one group says 32 GB is the bare minimum, well others bluntly say that no useful LLM is able to run comfortably in such a tiny amount of RAM, they say minimum should be 128 GB.I ordered yesterday the MacBook Air with 32 Go Ram and 512 Go of storage, with Edu Price (1564 euros, I never spent that much on a MBA). Delivery scheduled at the beginning of august. I hope also that I could get the back to school offer, since the delivery will probably occur after Back to school launch.
Wonder if the next MBA will get the M7 chip in 2027.
I choose to get 32 Go of RAM on the Macbook Air M5 to work with local LLM and RAG. I don’t know if it will work properly, I’m a newbie.
What do you think ? @Populus, what do you intend to do with 32 go of Ram in your MBA M5 ?
Completly agree we jumped in the unknown regarding local AI. I made a bit of research before pulling the trigger, asked also Gemini and Claude. And in the end, it appears that most people saying 32 Go is not enough are coders. And for an usage like mine (documents analysis, RAG, «writing» ...) and probably yours, MBA 32 Go could be even be confortable.I’m also a newbie, @Geekett . I’ve asked here and other forums regarding local LLMs, including other LLMs, and honestly all the replies fall in either of two categories: one group says 32 GB is the bare minimum, well others bluntly say that no useful LLM is able to run comfortably in such a tiny amount of RAM, they say minimum should be 128 GB.
At the same time, we are seeing how new approaches such as MoEs, our new compression methods, occur in the near future allow bigger models to run in 32 GB even less. To be honest, I’ve got this amount of RAM not only with local LLMs in mind, but also with other applications and software, and also future proofing, including future iterations of AI.
Right now, M7 looks really really well, and if I had to load a chip with a lot of RAM, it would definitely be the M7. But the question isn’t if a future chip will be much better, that’s a given, but rather if right now the M5 is a good purchase for the next year and a half, and in my opinion, I think it is.
I think we both did a good purchase, and that your machine is a great value; just be sure to watch closely the storage because maybe it could become a bit tight. But otherwise, I think it’s a good purchase. Nonetheless don’t get your hopes very high regarding local LLMS. This is a bit of a jump into the unknown in a field that gets new advancements every few weeks.
Yeah, most people who talk about local LLMs seem to be coders. Maybe that’s why they say you need a huge amount of memory. Maybe it’s for the context. Yes, in my case I want to experiment with local LLMs for something similar to what you say; document analysis, RAG, and maybe some knowledge management.And in the end, it appears that most people saying 32 Go is not enough are coders. And for an usage like mine (documents analysis, RAG, «writing» ...) and probably yours, MBA 32 Go could be even be confortable.
Considering the large price increase, I think going 32gb was the right call. We might all be hanging onto our current Mac’s longer than originally intended.Yeah, most people who talk about local LLMs seem to be coders. Maybe that’s why they say you need a huge amount of memory. Maybe it’s for the context. Yes, in my case I want to experiment with local LLMs for something similar to what you say; document analysis, RAG, and maybe some knowledge management.
You know what? Since the announcement of the new prices, I’ve been wondering if I really needed the 32 GB. Right now I’m happy I chose one terabyte of storage, but not so sure about the 32 GB. Why because I keep seeing that 1TB/32GB configuration at 1550€ as a great value, and because I’m not sure I will take advantage of the full 32GB of RAM. But what’s done is done, and right now that 1TB/24GB configuration would cost me more than what my 32 GB machine cost me. I just hope that in the case of selling it in the future, I will be able to recover at least part of that extra money.
And who knows? Maybe in the future new models, new compression methods, or even new features for Siri AI on macOS get benefited from having the maximum amount of memory available on the M5.
Either if you regret having just 512 GB or I regret having too much memory, we both have to accept that we won’t be able to purchase a Mac with such a great value anymore, as prices won’t be lower anytime soon, and there’s even the possibility that future machines will be even more expensive. So don’t worry, you can always use external drives and I can always try to recover part of the extra €250 that I spent in the 32 GB machine.
Yeah, this is some sort of copium lol
Not really the comparison you are making, but MBPro doesn't always make sense if you aren't going with the Pro SoC upgrade (IMO) in order to just have the active cooling (fan) help out with sustained workloads.I know I’m late to this thread but I feel like if someone intends to push their laptop to thermal limits, indicating some power usage, saying they’d wanna keep that laptop 8-10 years is a bit weird.
Thanks for your opinion. I’m just a consumer that wants to leave the door open to be able to use the computer for some pro-sumer tasks, but at a learning level, not professional. Fortunately I’ll have plenty of years to do that on this machine.I know I’m late to this thread but I feel like if someone intends to push their laptop to thermal limits, indicating some power usage, saying they’d wanna keep that laptop 8-10 years is a bit weird.
Most likely a few years down the road you’ll want to upgrade to take advantage of the latest processors and get stuff done faster.
Not to mention around the 5 year mark you might stop getting OS updates. Perhaps the M series will last longer to 7 years or so for updates but I’m sure by then you’ll be losing new OS features anyway.
At a maximum, a laptop is a 5 years purchase, up to 7. And that’s for regular users. For power users 2-3 years.