I think I've been misunderstood. I wasn't looking for an art film or something classic. I simply meant there is an art to film making. Consistent directing is necessary, especially in a faux documentry as the camera becomes a character itslef. Filling plot holes and explaining important details are necessary to the story and mistakes or odd details shouldn't just be ignored. In fact I think making the film a DOCUMENTRY it was even more important to explain missing facts.
I think I'm more than entitled to an opinion, and I stand by it. I see the entertaiment value in the film, but it had a lot of distracting flaws, and no memorable scenes. Making it a pretty disappointing film.
And Lee, I have nothing against pornographic films, I meant more of an old meaning for the word. As in rubish or meaningless drivel, meant to simply distract people.