just a poll....i think it's an interesting question.....i personally think that its perfect because they charged 20 bucks for the Jan Soft Upgrade......anyways....big improvement
They should charge as they're not on contracts.. They only have it free for iPhone cus they're on contract and have to keep paying... etc
but for people who did not buy the first upgrade, I wonder if they will require that first or if it will be included in 2.0 or if they can run independent of each other?
I also hope Apple will at least provide Touch users with a portion of the 2.0 update for free, that is any bug fixes they may have added. You shouldn't have to pay to fix something that wasn't working the way it was supposed to to begin with
It's been shown that Apple couldn't care less about AT&T's contracts. Apple markets the iPhone as cheaper than the original because from Apple it is cheaper. Never mind the fact that AT&T charges more and that it will cost more over time for the end-user.
If this is true, then why did Apple sign an exclusivity deal with AT&T? I may be missing something, but cutting off potential customers just doesn't make sense IMHO.
Why does Apple not have support for more than six graphics cards in the Mac Pro? Why does Apple not support OS X on generic computers? To cut down on problems. It's easier to troubleshoot problems in one network than to have your team learn about every network. Just like it's easier to not support every PCI-E GPU in existence.
By law they have to. No, I don't agree with that law.
I know that's how Apple explains it away, but if that's actually the case why has Sony released a boatload of PS3 firmware updates that have added software and hardware support... for free?
iPhone users pay monthly service fees, so their upgrade is provided for free
I know that's how Apple explains it away, but if that's actually the case why has Sony released a boatload of PS3 firmware updates that have added software and hardware support... for free?
Doesn't that "law" only apply to mobile communication devices?
sorry
but if you have xp and want vista...you have to pay
but if you have tiger and want leopard..you have to pay
if you have OS 1 and want OS 2.0..you have to pay?
are you not getting this?
sorry
but if you have xp and want vista...you have to pay
but if you have tiger and want leopard..you have to pay
if you have OS 1 and want OS 2.0..you have to pay?
are you not getting this?
XP to Vista you get many features
Tiger to leopard you get 300 new features
OS1 to OS 2.0 should be free and apple should not nickel and dime us
for 3 new feature upgrade
IT SHOULD BE FREE