Don't get me wrong, I'm really tempted to trade in my 6S for an SE, as I much more prefer the 5S design and size. I was just hoping it would be a 4" phone on par, entirely, with the 6S.
Don't get me wrong, I'm really tempted to trade in my 6S for an SE, as I much more prefer the 5S design and size. I was just hoping it would be a 4" phone on par, entirely, with the 6S.
What size phone a person wants is subjective.
--
Regardless of anyone's subjective preference for design or size, it's an objective fact that, based on the specs and hardware, the SE is technologically an inferior phone to the 6S. The hard decision for some, myself included, is determining what matters most to us: form or function. I only buy a new iPhone when there's new technology that warrants it (personally). I really would prefer the form of the SE, but I'm really having a hard time thinking through the fact that I'd be downgrading and losing money on my iPhone 6S.
I don't think anyone is saying the SE is an innovative marvel, its not meant to be, its meant to address a segment of consumers that have been clamoring for a 4" phone.
The SE is inferior in light of the fact that it doesn't have top of the line features like 3D Touch, but other than that it still has the A9/M9 processor which compensates for a lot. Also it has a LCD display, although lacking 3D Touch, not a mainstream feature yet.
My point is so did the 5 and 5s both had the same screen yet they never made battery life like the 6s.....so we come full circle.The SE does have a smaller screen. The screen consumes the most power.
i would like too some data how people use their phones...
for a some reason i think people, who are switching from 6s to SE, use mostly their phones just for calling, messaging and listening rather than surfing, playing and movies and hence the small size fits to that purpose while other appreciate larger screens.
From what I have read, that is the case, not only is the A9 faster, but it uses less electricity.The A9 processor is probably more efficient too compared to the one in the old 5.
My point is so did the 5 and 5s both had the same screen yet they never made battery life like the 6s.....so we come full circle.
Thinking a bit more: iPhone SE is actually positioned quite cleverly - on paper it passes the key tickbox tests; however some of the elegance might be yet hidden on paper - it's super compact, good battery, good price - makes it great option for city rushers who just need to get to their destination.
Reminds me of the G4 PowerBook days - where they ran 12", 15" and 17" configs.
I wasn't expecting long lines, though I do wonder what the actual sales figures were - that will help play into whether Apple will update the line next year (or the year after).
I'm just about to order, but, I'm confused by the two options. I'm a T-Mobile USA (GSM) voice user who travels and wants maximum interoperability worldwide. The 6S (I don't have) looks almost perfect, but, the two SE models seem to have LTE gaps for international roaming. It looks like Apple suggests the A1662, but, I don't understand that -- it looks like the A1723 would be better for T-Mobile+international. Will there be any problem buying a "Sprint" model and using it (GSM) on T-Mobile, occasional roaming to AT&T, and use internationally?