Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Do you feel that SE is inferior product to the 6S?


  • Total voters
    266
Don't get me wrong, I'm really tempted to trade in my 6S for an SE, as I much more prefer the 5S design and size. I was just hoping it would be a 4" phone on par, entirely, with the 6S.
 
The SE is inferior in light of the fact that it doesn't have top of the line features like 3D Touch, but other than that it still has the A9/M9 processor which compensates for a lot. Also it has a LCD display, although lacking 3D Touch, not a mainstream feature yet.
 
What size phone a person wants is subjective.
--
Regardless of anyone's subjective preference for design or size, it's an objective fact that, based on the specs and hardware, the SE is technologically an inferior phone to the 6S. The hard decision for some, myself included, is determining what matters most to us: form or function. I only buy a new iPhone when there's new technology that warrants it (personally). I really would prefer the form of the SE, but I'm really having a hard time thinking through the fact that I'd be downgrading and losing money on my iPhone 6S.

I don't think anyone is saying the SE is an innovative marvel, its not meant to be, its meant to address a segment of consumers that have been clamoring for a 4" phone.

The SE is inferior in light of the fact that it doesn't have top of the line features like 3D Touch, but other than that it still has the A9/M9 processor which compensates for a lot. Also it has a LCD display, although lacking 3D Touch, not a mainstream feature yet.

I'm just about to order, but, I'm confused by the two options. I'm a T-Mobile USA (GSM) voice user who travels and wants maximum interoperability worldwide. The 6S (I don't have) looks almost perfect, but, the two SE models seem to have LTE gaps for international roaming. It looks like Apple suggests the A1662, but, I don't understand that -- it looks like the A1723 would be better for T-Mobile+international. Will there be any problem buying a "Sprint" model and using it (GSM) on T-Mobile, occasional roaming to AT&T, and use internationally?
 
Thinking a bit more: iPhone SE is actually positioned quite cleverly - on paper it passes the key tickbox tests; however some of the elegance might be yet hidden on paper - it's super compact, good battery, good price - makes it great option for city rushers who just need to get to their destination.

Reminds me of the G4 PowerBook days - where they ran 12", 15" and 17" configs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: azt33
I for one am looking forward to battery results of the SE surpassing the 6s...who would have thought it possible??
 
The SE does have a smaller screen. The screen consumes the most power.
 
The SE does have a smaller screen. The screen consumes the most power.
My point is so did the 5 and 5s both had the same screen yet they never made battery life like the 6s.....so we come full circle.
 
The A9 processor is probably more efficient too compared to the one in the old 5.
 
Consumers want options. Every current iPhone Apple makes allows their customer base to decide what is best for them. This is a good thing.

For me, having a four inch iPhone 6S (minus a few features I don't care much about) in the SE fits perfectly for my situation.

The battery life in the SE is my favorite spec. To Apple's engineers on this... Finally, bravo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: geta and catean
i would like too some data how people use their phones...

for a some reason i think people, who are switching from 6s to SE, use mostly their phones just for calling, messaging and listening rather than surfing, playing and movies and hence the small size fits to that purpose while other appreciate larger screens.

I use my phone for all those things apart from watching movies. I've got a tv for that. Problem is I game a lot less on my 6s because it's too big to comfortably hold. I do everything a lot less because it's uncomfortable to hold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catean
I don't need a phone right now, but in about a year this would be attractive.

And the savings will help pay for a new watch (which is what I interact with mostly, anyway)

And savings = money for more gadgets! :)
 
Thinking a bit more: iPhone SE is actually positioned quite cleverly - on paper it passes the key tickbox tests; however some of the elegance might be yet hidden on paper - it's super compact, good battery, good price - makes it great option for city rushers who just need to get to their destination.

Reminds me of the G4 PowerBook days - where they ran 12", 15" and 17" configs.

Exactly - and my favourite out of that bunch was no doubt the 12" PB (I had one for several years, still my favourite Apple notebook ever). I tend to prefer the smaller things, the iPhone SE, iPad Mini and hopefully soon the 12" rMB second generation. If I need anything bigger than the rMB, I'll get a monitor. Haven't had the need for it so far though, and I assume the same will be the case with the iPhone.
 
Now i own an SE, previously had the 6, and having 3 friends with the 6S and played with their handsets and 3D touch a lot when they got them i think the SE is the best of them.

Just the speed of the device makes it the best. 3D Touch i can easily live without, the faster touch ID would be nice but the one on the SE & 5S is not slow. I'm not that vain i'm taking selfies all the time so the front camera does not bother me, and it was good enough for people when the 5S came out so it should still be adequate.

It has very few trade off's for an extremely quick, compact smart phone with great battery life that you don't notice in your pocket and does not feel like you are going to drop it when you use it 1 handed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yep-sure
fb263d50b9c358a4983bef9d55ebc2bc.jpg
 
I'm just about to order, but, I'm confused by the two options. I'm a T-Mobile USA (GSM) voice user who travels and wants maximum interoperability worldwide. The 6S (I don't have) looks almost perfect, but, the two SE models seem to have LTE gaps for international roaming. It looks like Apple suggests the A1662, but, I don't understand that -- it looks like the A1723 would be better for T-Mobile+international. Will there be any problem buying a "Sprint" model and using it (GSM) on T-Mobile, occasional roaming to AT&T, and use internationally?

Honestly, go with the 6S - A1633 (http://www.techwalls.com/iphone-6s-plus-models-differences/). The SE is great, but for someone that travels a lot, you can't beat the 6S for carrier compatibility. The SE won't be near as flexible, either model.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.