Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Do you like Liquid Glass on Mac?

  • Yes

  • Meh…

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
you forgot to say "they are pretty bad ones in my opinion". why is it so hard for ppl to own their opinions, or to understand that their are other points-of view? 😔



The point remains, how do we determine if a feature is a waste of resources if the defense is always "but some people use it and like it"?

(doesn't even really matter for this discussion if some people think it's bad, ok, good or great)

Honestly, how even does Apple decide do we think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasualFanboy
I didn't say the feature is a waste. It's nice to have for some, for sure. I said it binds developer resources that could be spent for better things that have a greater impact on macOS than trying to unify iOS, iPadOS and macOS.
I have no idea how many hours it still takes to upkeep this feature that’s been implemented years ago and hasn’t changed since. Do you? And if we go down your path who knows what we end up stripping away for supposedly “better things” that have a supposedly “greater impact”. It’s pretty abstract.
 
I have no idea how many hours it still takes to upkeep this feature that’s been implemented years ago and hasn’t changed since. Do you? And if we go down your path who knows what we end up stripping away for supposedly “better” things that have a supposedly “greater impact”.

Not talking about maintenance of the feature, of course. I probably should have used past tense.

What I mean is that it adds up. All the fancy new eye candy revisions we get every year, all the new emoji-stuff we get every year, all the other toys like image playground or whatever it is called. Stage Manage ist just one example of many.

Ok, we got the new container stuff this year, so that's a plus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasualFanboy
I didn't say the feature is a waste. It's nice to have for some, for sure. I said it binds developer resources that could be spent for better things that have a greater impact on macOS than trying to unify iOS, iPadOS and macOS.



View attachment 2558660
i am all for discussion, clear about my opinions being my opinions, yet still attacked for not agreeing with ppl with a different POV. how many ppl here make 'absolute' statements here, when really, they're just voicing an opinion.

(also, while that is photo-accurate, you left out the glasses) 🤓
 
The point remains, how do we determine if a feature is a waste of resources if the defense is always "but some people use it and like it"?

(doesn't even really matter for this discussion if some people think it's bad, ok, good or great)

Honestly, how even does Apple decide do we think?
who is 'we' in this scenario? that's your problem right there; you're speaking for yourself, you don't represent anyone else 🤔
 
Not talking about maintenance of the feature, of course. I probably should have used past tense.

What I mean is that it adds up. All the fancy new eye candy revisions we get every year, all the new emoji-stuff we get every year, all the other toys like image playground or whatever it is called. Stage Manage ist just one example of many.

Ok, we got the new container stuff this year, so that's a plus.
Because a lot of people get bored. It’s as simple as that. It’s the only reason we’ve been having an interface revision every 4 to 6 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unsui_grep
i hear what you're saying, but this, above: what's your source for this info?

is there actual evidence that macusers are thinking about moving to windows? because i have a hard time believing most (non-tech-oriented) ppl would want to change OSes, for any reason. of course, that's just my theory; is your statement also theory?
I can't cite any hard statistics with respect to dwindling market share percentages, but I'm not sure you need them to feel the AI winds over the last few years. The continued rise in popularity of PC gaming and AI/LLM workflows have certainly benefited NVIDIA's fortunes. Microsoft is certainly way ahead integrating AI workflows into their ecosystem. While more hardware manufacturers are embracing ARM, the prevalence of AWS and cloud computing makes hardware agonistic solutions more attractive, certainly in terms of cost. Android is more competitive than ever and has brought actual useful AI to market quicker than Apple. Even Meta is starting to deliver some interesting products to market. All of these trends are a threat to Apple's hold on their customer base, reputation, and ecosystem. When you start seeing more and more people with hybrid PC/Mac setups, you see folks becoming less dependent on the ecosystem and that costs services revenue, something Apple has increasingly relied on. A quick YouTube search for "Custom PC builds" will deliver you plenty of sexy market hype that rivals Apple's own.

Given Apple's recent stumbles and the growing threats from competitors and foreign governments alike, there is really not a lot of room for error, complacency, or arrogance right now. I think it's fair to say Apple's luster and competence is being questioned right now. Again, I don't have any hard statistics at hand but I don't know if that's necessary at the moment to see a landscape full of threats. I certainly don't buy Apple's own numbers concerning OS26 adoption rate considering their recent decision to lock their customers into OS26 on all other platforms so recently after release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasualFanboy
Because a lot of people get bored. It’s as simple as that. It’s the only reason we’ve been having an interface revision every 4 to 6 years.
This is an unfortunate truth. Liquid Glass, in its current incarnation at least, has spread out from Vision Pro not out of necessity for a better user experience but because it makes good marketing.

I think there’s also a great irony that over the past several years Apple has made strides to improve accessibility features on Mac and the effort has been commendable; yet their latest GUI creates new problems in this field. You couldn’t make it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Because a lot of people get bored. It’s as simple as that. It’s the only reason we’ve been having an interface revision every 4 to 6 years.
And sometimes when a company fails to deliver useful or compelling features that "just work".
 
I like the Tahoe wallpaper at least this far - how it changes.
Haven’t had any trouble with anything this far.
But can’t say that I like or unlike the Liquid Glass, but it doesn’t bother me either.
So between dislike, like or meh, I picked yes.
If it’s been neutral instead of meh, I had picked that.
 
Stage Manager is one of those things I never understood Apple pulling into macOS. It's utterly pointless.
I agree, though I think it's good that Apple tries these things, especially when you can switch them off. After all, they have the metrics to allow them to determine whether a feature is worth keeping or not. I suspect this is what happened with Launchpad. i.e. the metrics showed a rapid decline in use, and so they ditched it. Things is, there will always folk who rely on a particular feature, as these forums show.
Trying to "synchronize" all the different OSes Apple has is one of the biggest mistakes they are making. iOS-ifying macOS is literally stupid.
Yeah, it's like putting a steering wheel on a motorcycle. Different formats need different approaches.
 
Anything's going to seem better than Windows—talk about a low bar.
You haven’t heard?

Windows 11? Honestly, it looks like a guy in a business suit compared to the Fisher-Price toy made of glass that is macOS Tahoe ;-)
—————
Again, what if we're UX designers
Found your own OS? Look around for a support group? Beyond that… I dunno, I don’t think I can solve that issue for you. 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
This is the point a lot of people are missing.
that some people are UX designers? and that a team of UX designers work for apple? and that the rules are things we invent (with purpose, of course). and that we don't all think the same, or see things the same...

i'll say it again: tahoe needs work, there are obvious GUI issues. but LG is the look of this OS, regardless of what ppl think of it.
 
And sometimes when a company fails to deliver useful or compelling features that "just work".

It's not just users getting "bored." Sometimes OS developers don't have compelling new technical features to push out, so they just change the interface. Tahoe seems very similar to Sequoia on a technical level (though a few bugs I've dealt with over two macOS versions have been fixed and seemingly Terminal got a much-needed update though iTerm2 and Rio are still better), most of the changes seem UI focused. I think a well-thought UI upgrade would have been great, but Tahoe ain't it.

There are so many technical features that could have been improved: Homebrew (how on earth does Windows have winget and Homebrew is still something I have to install from a third-party on every new Mac?), Time Machine, window management, the App store, Archive Utility could use updates, Spotlight (especially Tahoe's Spotlight) could be rethought through, I think someone posted something similar to WLS that Apple was working on but it's nowhere near as usable even if Macs need it less) and dare I hope - rolling back some of the baby-guardrails introduced in Sequoia and before (remember when Apple used to advertise Macs as bugging you less than Windows PCs?)? That's what I can come up with off the top of my head.
 
Found your own OS? Look around for a support group? Beyond that… I dunno, I don’t think I can solve that issue for you. 🤷‍♂️

So you don't know what UX design is, cool, could have just said that earlier on.

Most of us don't code (though I did teach coding as a part of my UX classes).
 
You haven’t heard?


—————

Found your own OS? Look around for a support group? Beyond that… I dunno, I don’t think I can solve that issue for you. 🤷‍♂️
I think it's fair to say that most people participating in this thread that most of the people love their Macs and probably prefer them to a Windows or Linux machine. For the sake of argument, let's take that as a given. It's also fair the say, that about 70% of the poll respondents are either underwhelmed or dislike LG on Tahoe. A lot of us are critiqueing the UX and visual design because it's a detriment to our workflows or enjoyment of using some pretty pricey tech that we've invested in. For a lot of Mac users there is an implicit agreement we make with Apple to give up a certain amount of control over the look and feel of the devices. But when a new OS fails to meet standards that Apple itself sets, then we have few options. We can choose not to upgrade. We can downgrade, but as of a couple of days ago, this only an option for macOS. We can file feedbacks, complain, and critique on forums and hope that Apple is willing to listen and address warranted criticism. Or, the option of last resort for many of us, we can jump to another platform. I'm choosing to critique and listen to other points of view. In my view, that's what Apple should do as well, but it takes courage and honesty. I asked you earlier, maybe you missed it, when you jumped from Windows to Mac. It wasn't some sort of gotcha question, I was genuinely curious to know if you've noticed a decline in the software quality since you first made the change and how it improved your workflow.
 
You haven’t heard?
It could look like a supermodel for all I care. The problem is that it treats me like garbage, now more than ever. At least with Linux and, to a certain extent MacOS, I feel like the system respects me. I'd much rather use a plain, but thoughtfully designed and user-friendly system, than a beautiful, user-hostile mess.
 
It's not just users getting "bored." Sometimes OS developers don't have compelling new technical features to push out, so they just change the interface. Tahoe seems very similar to Sequoia on a technical level (though a few bugs I've dealt with over two macOS versions have been fixed and seemingly Terminal got a much-needed update though iTerm2 and Rio are still better), most of the changes seem UI focused. I think a well-thought UI upgrade would have been great, but Tahoe ain't it.

There are so many technical features that could have been improved: Homebrew (how on earth does Windows have winget and Homebrew is still something I have to install from a third-party on every new Mac?), Time Machine, window management, the App store, Archive Utility could use updates, Spotlight (especially Tahoe's Spotlight) could be rethought through, I think someone posted something similar to WLS that Apple was working on but it's nowhere near as usable even if Macs need it less) and dare I hope - rolling back some of the baby-guardrails introduced in Sequoia and before (remember when Apple used to advertise Macs as bugging you less than Windows PCs?)? That's what I can come up with off the top of my head.
100% all of this! I'm a iOS dev on the side and I'm really missing out on a bunch of new tech that I've been wanting to try out, but instead I'm missing out. If I was making a living doing iOS work I'd probably suck it up. Eventually, I'll probably have to if I want to keep it up. But this janky and tacky update is demotivating. Aside from the aethetics and usability issues, an app with this many bugs would never get past their own app review let alone their Human Interface Guidelines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loby
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.