1) I have used several other Macs with comparable CPU performance. While not great, they are as I said, to quote myself, "serviceable", even with modern browsers like Chrome with modern websites, and with business applications and basic mainstream consumer applications. I wouldn't want to use one of those as my personal primary machine, but for a secondary machine or on a strict budget, they are "serviceable".Is that statement based on the fact that it geekbenchs similar to some iPad running a totally different architecture and a different OS, or actual first-hand experience with it?
2) iPad performance as indicated by Geekbench 5 actually does provide a reasonable estimate of performance when talking about mainstream apps such as Safari, Mail, and the like, even when compared against Macs in my experience. There are of course many exceptions, but for the mainstream stuff, it's actually a pretty decent ballpark indicator.
Anyhow, you were trying to use your power user experience to argue against a consumer machine. I was talking about basic consumer-oriented use, and in fact I actually specifically said that in my post, but you came back with an argument that dual-core doesn't do well with multiple VMs, which doesn't make much sense in that context.