Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Are you fine with your current iPhone's resolution?


  • Total voters
    131
And if Apple increases to 4K and other manufacturers implement 24k would you want Apple to spec match?

I'm not discounting an improvement but OP's basis appears to be spec matching.
 
Beyond retina resolution, what would you gain? Honestly, what would you gain from additional pixels that you can't see?

With higher resolution would only come greater inefficiencies such as greater data usage and more demanding video processing resulting in slower performance, more heat, and less battery life.

In my opinion there is little to gain and a lot to lose when any smartphone manufacturer makes "improvements" that have no positive user impacts but plenty of negative impacts -- simply to be able to say they did in the next glossy presentation.

You been brainwashed by Apple marketing - "Beyond retina resolution...". Retina is a Apple made up term.
 
I need a standard resolution that is NOT scaled up and down because Apple choose to expose a fixed virtual resolution in all of their API's.
I want a standard 1080p or 4k resolution, including the standard aspect ratio of the physical screen.
 
I do. The current "retina" displays are lagging behind modern display tech. This might be fixed with the 2017 iPhones' OLED display, which might also include a higher resolution. I mean the iPhone has kept this 326 ppi display for 6 years, while all other manufacturers have upgraded their display's PPI since then, with sony in the lead with its ridiculous 806 ppi 4k Xperia 5 Premium. While that is definitely too far, I don't think it is unreasonable to ask for the ability to watch full hd movies and videos. I suggest a 1080p 4.7" iPhone display, at 469 PPI, and a 1440p 5.7" Plus display, at 515 PPI.
But if the naked eye can't tell the difference, what's the point?

It'd be like headphones that go all the way up to 100khz, when the limit of human hearing is 20khz. It's a bigger number designed to impress those who are impressed by bigger numbers. But otherwise pointless.
[doublepost=1470493878][/doublepost]
More is always better...
Not always.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IHelpId10t5
But if the naked eye can't tell the difference, what's the point?

It'd be like headphones that go all the way up to 100khz, when the limit of human hearing is 20khz. It's a bigger number designed to impress those who are impressed by bigger numbers. But otherwise pointless.
[doublepost=1470493878][/doublepost]
Not always.
Sure, more memory, more battery, more screen resolution, more cpu power, more screen on time, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IHelpId10t5
Sure, more memory, more battery, more screen resolution, more cpu power, more screen on time, etc.
More money, more Sex, more Stuff ...

Concentrate on your inner self ... you will realise that all of that disappears into the mist and the beauty of your existence will probably reveal itself.

... or you can just continue playing Pokemon on a 4k Android phone. I don't care ;)
 
Are you fine with the current resolution and do you wish that you had a higher resolution are somewhat different questions. I mean in my case I would probably answer yes to both questions.

I agree. Can't change the poll's name though
 
More money, more Sex, more Stuff ...

Concentrate on your inner self ... you will realise that all of that disappears into the mist and the beauty of your existence will probably reveal itself.

... or you can just continue playing Pokemon on a 4k Android phone. I don't care ;)
Inner self? Pokemon? What has all that to do with phone manufacturers upgrading the internals of their phone. We're not discussing shallow moralities, we're discussing hardware upgrades.:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: The.Glorious.Son
I think the 4 inch should be 720p, the 4.7 should be 1080p, the 5.5 should be the Quad HD like the Galaxy s7.

...

This would be the perfect scenario, IMO.
[doublepost=1470500154][/doublepost]
But if the naked eye can't tell the difference, what's the point?

It'd be like headphones that go all the way up to 100khz, when the limit of human hearing is 20khz. It's a bigger number designed to impress those who are impressed by bigger numbers. But otherwise pointless.
[doublepost=1470493878][/doublepost]

I'm glad you brought up the perceivable audio spectrum. I always believed that CD audio was lacking something ("fullness" or "richness") when compared to full spectrum analog sound (e.g., vinyl). I, personally, have clearly heard the difference.

I believe the same concept applies here. Even though one can't see individual pixels above 300 to 400+ PPI, I have noticed a visual richness/fullness nonetheless.
 
I'm fine with the SE display and the 6S Plus display. I'm getting a Note 7 and when I compared the Note 7 screen to my 6S Plus display, the 6S Plus compared very favorably. It's the regular 6 and 6S display that always looked a bit grainy to me. I think they should have been bold about making it thicker to give it a much better battery and a display as nice as that of the 6S Plus and 6Plus.

Samsung made the note 7 thicker than the Note 5 and didn't receive any backlash that I saw over it. In exchange the Note 7 gets a beefier battery.

For my part I would welcome a thicker 7 if it had a nicer display and a camera that was as good as the one given to the Plus size model. But I suppose Apple has its customers used to very thin devices and there would be a backlash if they try making the shorter narrower device fatter to compensate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dk001
This would be the perfect scenario, IMO.
[doublepost=1470500154][/doublepost]

I'm glad you brought up the perceivable audio spectrum. I always believed that CD audio was lacking something ("fullness" or "richness") when compared to full spectrum analog sound (e.g., vinyl). I, personally, have clearly heard the difference.

I believe the same concept applies here. Even though one can't see individual pixels above 300 to 400+ PPI, I have noticed a visual richness/fullness nonetheless.

"Some" can't perceive a difference.

The idea of "retina" was marketed (not sure if there was actual science involved) so individual pixels could not be destinguished from one another with 20/20 vision at a pre defined viewing distance.

Somehow people got it in their heads that 20/20 vision is "perfect" vision. Therefore no one can see individual pixels at a normal viewing distance. In reality a shockingly large percent of the population have better than 20/20 vision. Maybe not the majority but a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dk001 and Peter K.
No. The screen on my 6S+ is great enough and the batterylife doesn't need to be more crap than it already is.
Other phones — which also happen to have higher resolution screens — have very comparable battery life to the iPhone.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dk001
Other phones — which also happen to have higher resolution screens — have very comparable battery life to the iPhone.
But others phablet have bigger battery capacity than the iPhone 6s Plus and we all know Apple is being cheap with the battery in iPhones so they probably won't put a 3500mAh battery until a long time.
 
But others phablet have bigger battery capacity than the iPhone 6s Plus and we all know Apple is being cheap with the battery in iPhones so they probably won't put a 3500mAh battery until a long time.

As long as we're wishing for things, why not wish for a larger battery?
[doublepost=1470540443][/doublepost]
Point taken, you're right. It's pretty dumb to have the thread title and poll title be different.

I know, I know, but I can't change that now, I've tried.
 
I agree. Can't change the poll's name though
You should be able to alternatively edit the thread title though. Or at the very least could report your OP to the mods to request a change of the poll or title or something else and they would generally take care of if fairly quickly.
 
No, current resolution is more than fine. For reference, I have a cellphone with a 720p resolution for a 4.5" screen. That's lower than the iPhone, yet I love it. Nothing is wrong with the current screen resolution.

Fix the battery first, how about it? And don't make the phone thinner.
 
But others phablet have bigger battery capacity than the iPhone 6s Plus and we all know Apple is being cheap with the battery in iPhones so they probably won't put a 3500mAh battery until a long time.

It has nothing to do with being "cheap". Apple decided years ago that iOS devices should run for 10 hours of surfing, watching movies, etc. They have had this spec on nearly every iPhone and iPad. So as battery tech and processor efficiency has improved, they've made the phones lighter and thinner, not longer-running.

Everyone I know, plugs their phone in every night. Apple must have solid data backing up their design choices - and I've never heard someone (outside of these forums) wanting a fatter, heavier iPhone with more battery life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Most iPhone owners don't know the difference and most probably don't care. If Apple was bragging about it, like they did years ago, people would buy into the hype. But not today.

That said, I'd certainly appreciate a modern display. My Android phones have gorgeous high resolution screens. Side by side with my iPhone 6S Plus, Apple's looking awfully outdated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrex and omeryounos
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.