Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Are you fine with your current iPhone's resolution?


  • Total voters
    131
You can tell that to the person who liked your post.When I gave him proof that the Galaxy S7 had the best phone display on the planet according to Displaymate he claimed it was just an opinion.I am merely using his logic
Well it has been claimed by some, it's a proven fact. There are several facts at play; gamut, resolution,screen technology etc are all facts. Which one "looks" better is subjective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HEK
maxresdefault.jpg

You guys don't have to take my word for it.Heres a screen grab from a YT video
As you can see the S2 STILL manages to win in display quality Even looking at this comparison on a LCD display shows the better image quality on tab s2.The difference is even greater in real life


Well yes if you actually believe that in the pics above you found the iPad to have a better display.



All i can see is terrible light bleed in the android tablet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dontworry
Well it has been claimed by some, it's a proven fact. There are several facts at play; gamut, resolution,screen technology etc are all facts. Which one "looks" better is subjective.
And here are some facts stated by Anandtech

"There's really not much else to say about the Tab S2 9.7's display. Samsung has really done a great job with calibrating the displays on recent AMOLED devices, and the Tab S2 9.7 offers a display that is just as good as any other tablet. One could argue that the true blacks actually put the Tab S2 9.7 ahead of the competition, and I would be inclined to agree. My only complaint is that the iPad Air 2 with its AR coating tends to be a bit more usable outside and in other scenarios where there are heavy reflections. There's really no way to conclude which tablet offers the absolute best display, but I think it would be correct to say that in most cases the Tab S2 9.7's display is as good, if not better than any other tablet on the market."

And here is its comparison to Air 2

The display on the Tab S2 9.7" is phenomenal. It's every bit as sharp as the iPad Air 2, every bit as accurate, and has the best black level and contrast ratio you'll find on any device. It did seem a bit more difficult to use in unforgiving lighting than the iPad Air 2 due to the differences in brightness and reflectiveness, but in most scenarios it wouldn't be an exaggeration to say that it's the best tablet display that I've ever seen, and that's a huge win for Samsung.

So your statement thta in that pic,the iPad is more color accurate is false.

And as far as to your saturation comment being unrealistic ,this is what it states

"Saturation accuracy on the Tab S2 9.7 is phenomenal. It's better than every other tablet except for the Microsoft Surface 3, and at this point you would really be hard pressed to see errors in the rendering of pure primary and secondary colors"


And to prove my point that OLED is brighter and more vibrant,here is Anand's comparison.IS the pic "Adjusted" here too?

AuSDNHc.jpg
 
Last edited:
And here are some facts stated by Anandtech

"There's really not much else to say about the Tab S2 9.7's display. Samsung has really done a great job with calibrating the displays on recent AMOLED devices, and the Tab S2 9.7 offers a display that is just as good as any other tablet. One could argue that the true blacks actually put the Tab S2 9.7 ahead of the competition, and I would be inclined to agree. My only complaint is that the iPad Air 2 with its AR coating tends to be a bit more usable outside and in other scenarios where there are heavy reflections. There's really no way to conclude which tablet offers the absolute best display, but I think it would be correct to say that in most cases the Tab S2 9.7's display is as good, if not better than any other tablet on the market."

And here is its comparison to Air 2

The display on the Tab S2 9.7" is phenomenal. It's every bit as sharp as the iPad Air 2, every bit as accurate, and has the best black level and contrast ratio you'll find on any device. It did seem a bit more difficult to use in unforgiving lighting than the iPad Air 2 due to the differences in brightness and reflectiveness, but in most scenarios it wouldn't be an exaggeration to say that it's the best tablet display that I've ever seen, and that's a huge win for Samsung.

So your statement thta in that pic,the iPad is more color accurate is false.

And as far as to your saturation comment being unrealistic ,this is what it states

"Saturation accuracy on the Tab S2 9.7 is phenomenal. It's better than every other tablet except for the Microsoft Surface 3, and at this point you would really be hard pressed to see errors in the rendering of pure primary and secondary colors"


And to prove my point that OLED is brighter and more vibrant,here is Anand's comparison.IS the pic "Adjusted" here too?

AuSDNHc.jpg
The picture you posted stands for itself. Thanks.
 
One on left seems way to bright, would hurt eyes after hours of viewing.
This is what I keep saying, when the brightness is ratcheted down to a level my eyes can tolerate, there is no difference.
I think it's clear that we're talking about the iPad Pro 9.7 in this thread, not the Air 2. So your comparison quotes are not relevant.
We were discussing the ipad pro 9.7, which from the original photo is nearly identical to the other tablet.
 
One on left seems way to bright, would hurt eyes after hours of viewing.

On the contrary at its lowest brightness,the S2 is less bright than the iPad.It just can get very bright if you want it to
I think it's clear that we're talking about the iPad Pro 9.7 in this thread, not the Air 2. So your comparison quotes are not relevant.
The difference in display quality apart from Truetone between the Air 2 and the Pro is negligible in real life.I actually disabled Truetone because it made my iPad look yuckish

Even Ars technica agrees

"The screen dominates the experience while you’re using a tablet, so let’s talk about that first. Most improvements are hard to spot unless you're looking for them. The screen, for instance, is nice. But it’s only nice in ways that you’ll really notice if you’re a stickler for color accuracy or see an older and newer iPad side-by-side.For instance, the screen’s DCI P3 color gamut (a feature originally implemented in the most recent 4K and 5K iMacs) means it can display deeper and more accurate shades of green and red, but it’s not nearly as impactful"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dk001
The term "Retina" is all about context. The current panel in the 6s is not enough for me personally. 1334 X 750 in a 4.7" display equals 325.61 pixels per square inch. Now, in order for the display to appear perfectly sharp, I have to hold my iPhone 6s at least 10.5" away at ALL times or I no longer have a "Retina" display. I am one who likes to read closer than 10.5" because the 4.7" display is quite small. The reason the 6s Plus seems so much better is because with a 1920 X 1080 panel in a 5.5" display we get 400.53 pixels per square inch. Now we gain an extra two inches in our viewing distance and the display will still stay perfect sharp. 8.6" to be exact on the 6s Plus. May not sound like a huge difference but, the effective resolution is even greater because we have 40% more viewing area attributed by the increase in display size. That's where the double whammy comes into play.

"Retina" in my mind is about having a display that will stay "Retina," meaning pixels will not be resolved up to 6" for me. The S7 Edge does just that with a 2K panel in a 5.5" display. The smaller the display size, the greater the need to increase the display and pixels per square inch because our effective resolution is less by virtue of a smaller display that forces the user to hold closer to their face.

It's also interesting to me that my iPad Air 2 looks sharper and crisper than my iPhone 6s, even though I have to hold my iPad at least 13.5" away. Well I've got more than double the screen area, so I really don't need to get near as close as I do with my iPhone 6s. The iPad therefore ends up looking much sharper at 264 pixels per square inch because we are displaying that on a 9.7" display. I just don't need to be as close.

1080P would be perfect for the 6s and they could honestly leave the 6s Plus where it's at. 2K would be nice to though but you have to get pretty darn close to that display to see the difference between a 2K panel and a 1080P one in a 5.5" display. Your eyes can only focus at a certain distance.

With this said, I love having a display that stays "Retina" at all viewing distances. The 6 Plus was the closest device I've had from Apple to do that. The S7 Edge I used for two weeks did that at all viewing angles no matter how close I was to the display. It was quite amazing to use.
Why only two weeks?
 
A buddy had an extra one so he let me use it for a couple of weeks and that allowed me to decide if I was going to trade my 6s and cash for it. It was real nice of him.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.