Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It will be huge. Apple could box up iPoop and probably sell it in huge volume. ;) (I'm barely joking there)

The app store is huge by itself. Even if Apple would continue to treat it as a "hobby" internally, unleashing third-party developers will deliver utility and enjoyment we can't even imagine today. They'll make it huge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scapegoat81
Even if that's somehow now what you meant and your referring to potential, that still isn't a good comparison.

A9X and A8X make little difference it terms of games. Will some iOS game run a lot better? Probably.

Neither has enough power needed to run anything close to what any of the current three consoles are capable of.

Huge difference in terms of games. The Apple TV only has an A8 (not X) to begin with, so an A9X would bring roughly double the CPU and more importantly GPU power. A well-optimized game could squeeze more power than you'd think out of that chip.
 
Huge difference in terms of games. The Apple TV only has an A8 (not X) to begin with, so an A9X would bring roughly double the CPU and more importantly GPU power. A well-optimized game could squeeze more power than you'd think out of that chip.
Like I said, it will make iOS game run better.

Whether its A8, A8X, or A9X, its not a dedicated GPU chip like what most people want to compare it too (games from Xbox One and PS4). Honestly, probably the iPad has better specs than the Wii U.

No matter how well you optimize a game, the new Apple TV just simply doesn't have enough specs to run the games people are hoping it can.

Like Crossy Roads game that they demoed. I'm sorry, but I don't think there will be any gamer who currently owns a gaming console look at that and say, "This is the future of gaming", sell their console and go buy a new Apple TV.

I think Apple recognizes and therefore is focusing more on apps than games which is the opposite of what the big three (Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony) do. I mean I can watch Netflix on my Xbox One app. It probably won't be as good as an app than the new Apple TV. But there's no way in hell, the Apple TV will ever be even remotely capable of running games like Witcher 3, MGSV, Tomb Raider, etc. with the A8X.
 
Like I said, it will make iOS game run better.

Whether its A8, A8X, or A9X, its not a dedicated GPU chip like what most people want to compare it too (games from Xbox One and PS4). Honestly, probably the iPad has better specs than the Wii U.

No matter how well you optimize a game, the new Apple TV just simply doesn't have enough specs to run the games people are hoping it can.

Like Crossy Roads game that they demoed. I'm sorry, but I don't think there will be any gamer who currently owns a gaming console look at that and say, "This is the future of gaming", sell their console and go buy a new Apple TV.

I think Apple recognizes and therefore is focusing more on apps than games which is the opposite of what the big three (Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony) do. I mean I can watch Netflix on my Xbox One app. It probably won't be as good as an app than the new Apple TV. But there's no way in hell, the Apple TV will ever be even remotely capable of running games like Witcher 3, MGSV, Tomb Raider, etc. with the A8X.

At least at this rate mobile GPU technology will come close to the performance of desktop-class GPUs within the next decade assuming the industry keeps improving at the current rate.

This may sound crazy but I do believe the iPad Pro at least could efficiently run some Xbox One ports assuming a developer was willing to take the time. Not all games would port over but the A8/A9X is at least ahead of the 360/PS3 and catching up to the current-generation even though it's not there.
 
At least at this rate mobile GPU technology will come close to the performance of desktop-class GPUs within the next decade assuming the industry keeps improving at the current rate.

This may sound crazy but I do believe the iPad Pro at least could efficiently run some Xbox One ports assuming a developer was willing to take the time. Not all games would port over but the A8/A9X is at least well ahead of the 360/PS3 and catching up to the current-generation even though it's not there.

The iPad Pro doesn't have the specs...

You keep on using assumptions, possibilities, theoretical.

In actuality, nothing Apple released today has the specs necessary to compare remotely with actual gaming consoles of today's market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jbachandouris
The iPad Pro doesn't have the specs...

You keep on using assumptions, possibilities, theoretical.

In actuality, nothing Apple released today has the specs necessary to compare remotely with actual gaming consoles of today's market.

Absolutely, it's not going to replace a PS4 or Xbox One. But Apple could establish its own corner of the market like the original Wii did while also releasing some current-gen comparable games. Right now ports aren't too important.
 
At the same time though, Apple didn't go all in enough for me.

For it to be really revolutionary, they should've been much more aggressive with content. Perhaps snag more impressive games. Release a "revolutionary gaming controller." Although Apple did state that Apple TV was getting the full console version of Disney Infinity, which is a first step to showing it's more than just Angry Birds casual.

There's also no new way to fill in the gaps. Give us a service with the channels Netflix and Hulu don't provide, along with live local channels.

There, Tim Cook, those two ideas alone could disrupt the industry much more so.

Did you hear that Apple was bidding for the "Top Gear" brits? Apple is going into content creation (TV shows and movies like Netflix). I see people complaining that the gaming will be mediocre. Well "Metal" lets the game app talk directly to the chip and provides faster performance than you'd think. Maybe not totally console, but it looks close from what they showed. But, not ultra fast gaming like in a dedicate rig or console. Not that anyone was expecting that anyway.

If you like the cable subscription model, you'll have to wait. Personally, I could care less. My favorite shows are purchased as seasons on iTunes and have no commercials. $20 ea. 1 time purchase. I dropped cable because I was hilariously just getting crappy full frame SD quality feed basic cable for $85/month 4 years back (HD was extra!!!). I now have Netflix, Hulu and my HD iTunes purchases plus YouTube, etc. and I'm still saving a boatload. Phooey on the old cable subscription.

My cord was cut and I was born into a better TV experience for what I want. ATV 4 will only make it better.
 
Last edited:
Did you hear that Apple was bidding for the "Top Gear" brits? Apple is going into content creation (TV shows and movies like Netflix). I see people complaining that the gaming will be mediocre. Well "Metal" lets the game app talk directly to the chip and provides faster performance than you'd think. Maybe not totally console, but it looks close from what they showed. But, not ultra fast gaming like in a dedicate rig or console. Not that anyone was expecting that anyway.

If you like the cable subscription model, you'll have to wait. Personally, I could care less. My favorite shows are purchased as seasons on iTunes and have no commercials. $20 ea. 1 time purchase. I dropped cable because I was hilariously just getting crappy full frame SD quality feed basic cable for $85/month 4 years back (HD was extra!!!). I now have Netflix, Hulu and my HD iTunes purchases plus YouTube, etc. and I'm still saving a boatload. Phooey on the old cable subscription.

My cord was cut and I was born into a better TV experience for what I want. ATV 4 will only make it better.





Please let there be a Plex app!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: andeify
I hate to be a Debbie downer but I didn't see an icon for connecting your iTunes library on local network. I'm a little freaked out that they might only allow the real iTunes Store stuff and not anything on local network. Anyone see any images that look like the Computers icon on the older apple TV?

I doubt that's the case. They simply didn't want to highlight an existing feature. If it is true it would be a no go for me as well.
 
It will be huge. Apple could box up iPoop and probably sell it in huge volume. ;) (I'm barely joking there)

The app store is huge by itself. Even if Apple would continue to treat it as a "hobby" internally, unleashing third-party developers will deliver utility and enjoyment we can't even imagine today. They'll make it huge.

No offense HobeSoundDarryl, because I'm not talking to you, but are people here that jaded about this latest event There was plenty to get excited about.

Apple TV came into it's own and looks to be updated along with their regular products now. iPad Pro is like a portable PC in power and just might compete with the Cintiq for illustrators and designers too. 3D touch and a refined iPhone camera, and so on. There was plenty of innovation that was showcased.
 
Last edited:
I was hoping for live streaming. Without it I have little use for the device. I can already watch Hulu and Netflix on my iPad and easily stream to my television via Chromecast.

It should be huge-ish.

It allows non Americans to have a single SVOD STB.
Gaming will be cool, iPad gamers will play on a large screen.
Wont affect PS and Xbox at all, they are serious consoles.

Apple TV will be a capable and a device that has multiple real uses.
 
Connect via HDMI to TV and use the TV's Optical Out?.

I stream nearly every music I hear at home from my iPhone to my Apple TV and so to my receiver. I don't want to have the TV running when it's not necessary.
Off course, modern receivers have HDMI Input for audio, but I don't want to buy a new receiver for 1000€ or so just because I upgraded my Apple TV.
Maybe a HDMI to SPDFI Converter / Splitter will do the job ...
 
It should be huge-ish.

It allows non Americans to have a single SVOD STB.
Gaming will be cool, iPad gamers will play on a large screen.
Wont affect PS and Xbox at all, they are serious consoles.

Apple TV will be a capable and a device that has multiple real uses.

Most adults don't "game" to begin with. Yes, many will play small app games on their smartphones or tablets, but they are not going to play games on the TV. Most adults have families, kids, etc. This doesn't happen. And, if a person does game already they already own an XBOX or Playstation. They are not going to buy an Apple TV for gaming.

Overall, Apple TV was suppose to bridge the gap between no TV and the cable bundles. If I can't watch my local channels along with about 10 cable channels via Apple TV there is no use for me. The only items I see the box performing is streaming Hulu and Netflix, but I can do that already without the need of an Apple TV. Most DVRs and gaming consoles have Hulu and Netflix already built into the device.
 
Plenty of adults do "game".

I'm in my 50's and I game on Xbox online and Apple app games on my TV through AirPlay using my iPhone or iPad with a Bluetooth controller by MadCatz. Been gaming on computers since I was 15, and no I'm no computer nerd. Most of my adult friends game too.

I will use every new feature of the new Apple TV and I welcome it. Especially the gaming. Did you see the gaming demo yesterday!? It was awesome!!

Sounds like you don't really want the next Gen TV devices, but the Apple TV will sell well to many, many people.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: laurim
Hankster, you're partly right. Family life doesn't really afford me much time to play games, although I enjoy certain genres (racing simulations, strategy). As a result I play some games on my phone when I have a bit of time. Often while on break at work. However, if I could advance in those same games by playing on my tv occassionally, that is a "system seller" for me. All other functionality aside.

This is going to be huge. Apps will make the Apple TV a standout in the way a smartphone compares to a standard mobile phone. Even before you weigh the "phone" functionality (in this case TV programming).
 
I disagree. Apple made the right move by skipping out on 4K right now. There is still too much up in the air with 4K when it comes to frame rates, color gamut, etc. Not to mention the required HDMI 2.0/HDCP2.2 hardware is still pretty costly and hard to come by at this time. The majority of 4K TVs sold so far would not have been able to take advantage of a 4K AppleTV if it came out right now anyway since most of them don't have HDMI2.0/HDCP2.2.

Update the Apple TV now at 1080p60, and the app store. Let customers and developers get used to it and figure out new and exciting ways to use it. Then come out with a new one again in a year or so when 4K stuff has really been standardized. People can move their Apple TV4 into the bedroom or kids room and put the Apple TV 5 in the living room/theater on their new 4K TV. Then developers can update their existing apps to support 4K or come out with new versions.

It took several years for Apple to figure out that 720p wasn't just going to cut it and then upgraded the ATV to 1080p. But they are far behind the curve when it comes to the pending transition to 4K. True, not all 4K sets in people's homes have the right connectors, but a substantial number of these sets can be upgraded with firmware updates or through out-board additions (such as the One Connect Box upgrade for Samsung sets). These upgrades include HDMI2.0/HDCP2.2. Couldn't have Apple provided 4K streaming capability anyway or at least make the new ATV firmware upgradeable? As it stands now, I have zero interest in the new ATV. Oh, and I do have a question. Is the new ATV OS backwards compatible with existing ATV's (third generation)?
 
Couldn't have Apple ... at least make the new ATV firmware upgradeable?
How do you know it isn't?

As it stands now, I have zero interest in the new ATV. Oh, and I do have a question. Is the new ATV OS backwards compatible with existing ATV's (third generation)?
That's a nice contradiction there. The fact you care about the new ATV OS being compatible with the older ATV3 means you have a greater than zero interest in the new ATV. :p
 
No, this will sell like the prior ATV. There is no features that a Roku, Amazon, Chrome, etc user would jump ship for.

With that being said, I am excited for the new ATV.
 
No doubt it is 'better', the gaming aspect looks promising but I already have a Playstation 3 and a Playstation 4, and an iPad and an iPhone, so gaming is covered by 4 devices already!

I really do hope all my iTunes Movies and TV Shows tagged using iDentify work from a metadata perspective, and also it still allows Home Sharing from iTunes running on PowerPC Macs.
 
No, this will sell like the prior ATV. There is no features that a Roku, Amazon, Chrome, etc user would jump ship for.

With that being said, I am excited for the new ATV.

I intend on buying one primarily due to access to the App Store and what that brings. Second reason is integration with my Apple hardware & services. Streaming tv services are a far distant third or fifth reason for my interest.

I don't see how a competing product can fill this type of intended usage. If so, I probably would have purchased it already.

There's tons of great educational apps for kids on the app store. I see the ATV making it a more family centric experience, rather than child head down in iThing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.