Where did you get that?
Apple retail store. Took a screenshot.
Where did you get that?
If it becomes a bother down the line, I'll just bring it in to the Apple Store and exchange it when I have the time.
It's not a short ride, but that's all the more reason why it's not a big deal. The big deal is how much use I can make of the computer during those 3 months.
All posts about rMBP problems are imaginary and worthless dribble.
See how fun blanket statements can be.
They just say we are silly and crazy about perfection...
If I spent nearly $3000 on a laptop, you're damn right I'd be expecting perfection.
This is why I'm glad I decided to wait for rev 2 of the rMBP. It's a great laptop, sure. Probably one of the best I've ever seen. But being the first release to use such a hardware intensive technology in such a thin chassis? Yeah, there's bound to be a couple of bugs.
If I spent nearly $3000 on a laptop, you're damn right I'd be expecting perfection.
This is why I'm glad I decided to wait for rev 2 of the rMBP. It's a great laptop, sure. Probably one of the best I've ever seen. But being the first release to use such a hardware intensive technology in such a thin chassis? Yeah, there's bound to be a couple of bugs.
Just because several rMBPs have some issues does not mean that the whole production line is faulty!
Most Americans who use credit cards do not pay the full balance on their card each month.
A 2011 study found that only 35% of Americans pay off their cards each month; 65% carry a balance.
.
Well, they refuse to exchange it. They said it is normal. It is in Apple's specification. That's problem. This is why that thread is so long in Apple forum. People are complaining and new comers who just notice Image retention when it got worse over time. People outside who don't really understand the problem. They just say we are silly and crazy about perfection. They just don't know what it is all about.
...Is a maxed-out Retina MBP four times as capable as a $1200 MBP? Nope.
Irrelevant. You make the claim that "most" rMBPs are flawed, you you offer nothing other than anecdotal support for that claim. As someone else said, there is no statistical analysis at play here to even make such a claim an educated guess - it's nothing more than innuendo and hyperbole.
How about 30% of respondents reporting problems?
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1459427/
*I know this is not a blind survey or perfect poll but it is data...
Actually, yes.
You're talking about "capability" there, not about whether people can "utilize" the machine to 100%. In terms of theoretical "capability", the quad-core Ivy Bridge chip in the maxed out rMBP is actually four times as capable, or at least twice as capable, as a dual-core chip in the 13" MBP or MBA you can get for $1200. That's not to mention you have a lot more visible pixels to work with on the rMBP compared to any other MacBook.
You are right, though, in that most people don't actually make use of that capability, but for those who actually DO make use of the capability, the rMBP is the much better choice compared to all other computers.
For instance, when I develop mobile apps, I really appreciate the fact that the rMBP can show the iPad Simulator at 1:1 pixel in Portrait mode, so I don't have to scroll up and down to see what it is I'm coding. Same goes for the iPhone 5 Simulator. On a regular 15" or 13" MBP, I wouldn't be able to show the iPad Simulator at 100% and see everything. If I scale the window down, then I am missing pixels that I shouldn't. If I show it at 100%, I have to constantly scroll up and down.
I think that the "actual capability" of the rMBP is closer to twice as powerful vs. four times as powerful:
http://www.macworld.com/article/116..._retina_models_occupy_the_consumer_space.html
I don't doubt that in your situation an rMBP makes you more productive. If you are making money using a Mac then spending more can sometimes pencil-out as being a worthwhile investment. I can remember a time when a $6000 PowerMac had over $12000 of RAM installed and it was a worthwhile investment for the printer who actually profited from the increased capability of the upgraded Mac.
But the construction worker who spent $4000 on a "maxed-out" rMBP over-spent at least $2000, unless he happens to do some heavy-duty computing on the side... And there are a lot of people on this forum who spend money that they cannot afford to obtain a minuscule gain in performance.
It's 4 times as "capable" to me because I can see 4 times more pixels on the screen.
But in terms of performance, the GPU is actually more than 4 times as powerful. It's only the CPU that's "only twice as powerful".
Not the whole, just 50% or whatever percentage out there possess LG screens![]()
DisagreeMy 2 friends have rMBP with LG screens and they are just as beautiful and flawless as mine with Samsung! Stop giving poor statistics...
I will wait patiently for what Apple has in store for us this coming Tuesday. We'll see if Apple has finally made things right and resolved heat dissipation and display issues. It will be utterly disappointing if Apple continues to consider this anomaly being a "feature" since a 13" rMBP will accomodate more sales, possibly double or triple the 15" rMBP.
I came across the article. The rMBP push to hardware limitation. With number of pixels, it has to drive 400% more. That is why apple has to overclock the GPU.