Just wondering? What do you have all those adapters for? As someone that hasn't needed a single adapter, I'm curious
It's pretty self explanatory.....
Just wondering? What do you have all those adapters for? As someone that hasn't needed a single adapter, I'm curious
The cables have a purpose but the reasoning for using them is what interests me. Why use an Ethernet cable when you have wifi? Wtf device that's currently used even has a 30 pin connector? EtcIt's pretty self explanatory.....![]()
The cables have a purpose but the reasoning for using them is what interests me. Why use an Ethernet cable when you have wifi? Wtf device that's currently used even has a 30 pin connector? Etc
I would've thought that line of thinking was pretty self explanatory.
iPhone 5 at least in terms of aesthetics and design was like the iPhone 4, with exception of being thinner and having a larger screen. The design of the iPhone 5 was same as the iPhone 4.What? I think you mean completely different in every way.
They were quite different. The 4 has a glass back and the "exoskeleton" antennas. The 5 has an aluminum body, glass "windows" for the antennas, and the (in)famous "chamfered edges". IMO the 4 has probably the most beautiful design yet, with the 5 a close second (and more practical).iPhone 5 at least in terms of aesthetics and design was like the iPhone 4, with exception of being thinner and having a larger screen. The design of the iPhone 5 was same as the iPhone 4.
They were quite different. The 4 has a glass back and the "exoskeleton" antennas. The 5 has an aluminum body, glass "windows" for the antennas, and the (in)famous "chamfered edges". IMO the 4 has probably the most beautiful design yet, with the 5 a close second (and more practical).
The cables have a purpose but the reasoning for using them is what interests me. Why use an Ethernet cable when you have wifi? Wtf device that's currently used even has a 30 pin connector? Etc
I would've thought that line of thinking was pretty self explanatory.
They were quite different. The 4 has a glass back and the "exoskeleton" antennas. The 5 has an aluminum body, glass "windows" for the antennas, and the (in)famous "chamfered edges". IMO the 4 has probably the most beautiful design yet, with the 5 a close second (and more practical).
Presumably we will start seeing, maybe even on day one, splitters/hubs? I don't think the demand for a wired input/output method for audio is going to go away, so we are likely to see new products released.So, let's just assume for a moment that the jack is gone, and I get a Rode iXY mic with the appropriate lightning connector for recording (and if anyone wants to send me the dosh for it, I'll give you my address) ....so where do I plug in my headphones to monitor? Anyone know any bluetooth monitor-quality phones? My Sonys are what I'm using now - but if BT is the way I have to go, which model, and how many nights of stone soup does it cost?
I use an ethernet cable because the transfer rates are higher (1Gb/s versus the 300Mb/s from wifi), and quite often the environments I work in don't have any network let alone wifi as I'm part of the team setting things up from scratch. Everyone has there own needs, and wifi is great when it's available but you can't assume it always is.
I've also found adaptors tend to work loose when the ports have been used a lot. RJ45 connectors don't as they have a clip. This is extremely important when you are configuring devices that cost a lot of money - you would look like a complete tool if you trashed it because your ethernet adaptor fell out while doing something important, not to mention that it would be the end of your job.
This is a problem with your line of thinking on the issue. Analog to S-Video to DVI-Optical to HDMI, etc... This is an industry standard that changed over time. Most devices during transition had both the previous standard connector and the new connector. Every TV, no matter the manufacturer, would use the current standard and maybe offer one or two ports of the older standard for customer appreciation.
The thing that's majorly different here is that Lightning is not a standard. It's completely Apple proprietary. If Apple wants to change how we listen to audio, they need to start at the industry level and work on a new or updated standard. This is THE REASON why standards exist in the first place... so that all of our technologies can work together.
It seems every other major PC/tablet/phone maker out there is using USB of some form. Because it's a standard. It would make a LOT more sense for Apple to ditch Lightning and use USB. Sure, there may be some downsides to this, but there wouldn't be if Apple would help to build the standard so that it fits their needs as well as others in the industry and doesn't cause inconveniences or frustrations for the end-users. Or heck, work on making Lightning THE standard so that this isn't a problem.
In 2016, removing the 3.5mm jack is a problem because there is no standard to replace it.
Yeah. I know people in IT that say they have to be hard wired into Internet for a multitude of reasons. Kinda sucks for them...
Unfortunately people that have needs like this are seen by Apple as a small subset of people and that the majority don't need to use cables. I think we're moving towards a future where 10 years from now the idea of plugging ANYTHING into a phone or iPad will seem weird. Like "wait a second. You used to literally plug things INTO your phone? Why?! My iPhone didn't even come with a cable!"
I can imagine it'll be similar to Steve jobs car vs truck analogy in reference to tablets and full on pc 's. That analogy is so malleable i think it can work to describe the thinking process of how we will be years down the line (a good separator of product uses) That someday most people will do EVERYTHING wirelessly and the people that need to plug in will be seen as people that need to do it for specific work related purposes
By then...Jesus Christ. I get a little excited in my pants thinking what an iPad or iPhone would be like 10 years from now when we've only had iPads for half that time
I don't think apple is going to lose a ton of business and become irrelevant because a few people had to use adapters for their special case scenariosthis is the point Apple have forgotten what was their core user base. Just wait until they are no longer cool. I'll be shorting their shares like crazy.
I don't think apple is going to lose a ton of business and become irrelevant because a few people had to use adapters for their special case scenarios
Can you name a situation where Apple has made a decision and the market has reacted by not buying their products? Seems like they know what they're doing. I heard all the same talk when they introduced the first MacBook Air without an optical drive. People called them crazy "I've invested so much into cd's! How could apple do this?"Not in the short-term, but their approach to users who invest in their products will catch them out in the long-term. They are too willing to sacrifice useful technology just to make things look cool.
Why? Bluetooth headphones require charging, cabled ones do not. I have bluetooth headphones sat in a drawer unused because of the need to recharge them. My Shure SE535's go everywhere with me as they have a nice cable that fits my iPhone, iPad and my laptop.
I appreciate that you like Bluetooth and yes Apple should support this. It shouldn't however remove choices where there is no good reason to do so. This isn't progressive, it's arrogant and pisses customers off. If this is removed from future iPhones I wouldn't bother buying another one.
Apples designers need a reality check. They might be selling loads, but that will stop if they keep pissing off the user base
[doublepost=1457608076][/doublepost]
No he's not right. It's a dumb idea.
Can you name a situation where Apple has made a decision and the market has reacted by not buying their products? Seems like they know what they're doing. I heard all the same talk when they introduced the first MacBook Air without an optical drive. People called them crazy "I've invested so much into cd's! How could apple do this?"
Same deal.
You sound like the people who argued against Apple removing disc drives from their Macs..
Now it's assumed your portable computer won't have a decade old technology.
The headphone jack is long over due. The world is moving toward bluetooth and wireless, and for those legacy needs you'll have an adapter just like you have for your ethernet port or external disc drive for the rare occasion.
The headphone jack is probably the oldest standard still in mobile phones and quite frankly you'll see other phones get rid of it after Apple does.
Check on this thread in a year or so, history won't be kind to your view.
i believe removing the headphone jack will be a huge mistake. i have many times gone to the local park to walk only to have forgotten my bluetooth headset and have to pull my spare set of headphones out of the glove box. i don't want another lightning adapter for headphones.
keep the jack!
Can you name a situation where Apple has made a decision and the market has reacted by not buying their products? Seems like they know what they're doing. I heard all the same talk when they introduced the first MacBook Air without an optical drive. People called them crazy "I've invested so much into cd's! How could apple do this?"
Same deal.
MacBook needs more powerful hw.
MacBook Pro needs to have the same look as the MacBook but a little bit fatter to allow for the latest hw.
Yeah. I know people in IT that say they have to be hard wired into Internet for a multitude of reasons. Kinda sucks for them...
why does the MacBook Pro need the same look as the MacBook? To me, the MBP looks and feels like a sleek, well built machine, while the MB looks and feels like cheap junk.
To me, the two most important criteria in picking a laptop are the keyboard and screen in that order. One of the reasons I started buying powerbooks back in 1999 was their keyboards were far better than anything I could find in a windows machine, even in that high price range. That has held true to this day. The keyboard in the MB is absolute garbage, and for that reason alone, I would never buy a machine like that.
You want the MB to have more powerful hardware, and the MBP to be a copycat MB with slightly faster CPU/GPU/Retina that is only slightly thicker? Both those machines would be trash to me, and why would Apple make 2 low end lines so similar and abandon the higher end line?
I would rather go the other way. The reason I haven't replaced my 2011 MBP is that I'm not willing to give up my 2 industry standard drive bays. The ethernet jack is also a huge plus for me. It cost me $75 to install 16 gig of memory back in 2011 and currently has a 512 gig SSD and 1TB spinning drive. To buy the machine I want today (16 gig/512 gig SSD) is stupidly expensive with Apple's upgrade fees and not really much better than my 2011 thanks to Apple's emphasis on smaller over better. About the only thing I'm missing is USB 3.
If my computer broker tomorrow, I'd buy a used 2012 model for $850 and throw in the memory and SSD. And I'm someone who has never bought a used tech item in my life. But the 2012 model is just so much better than anything Apple makes today and Apple just gets worse year after year.
[doublepost=1457704897][/doublepost]
Yeah, kinda sucks for people who know computers and really need them for pro enterprise applications. But it sure is great for kiddies to access facebook.
You have to wonder how long Apple will be able to keep selling computers to the masses when the IT pros they turn to for help, support, and buying advice sour on Apple.
It makes it funny thought when you see articles every few months about Apple trying to make it into the enterprise and all the fanatics scratching their heads wondering why companies won't buy macs and then blaming the "bean counters" who don't know a good modern computer from an abacus as long as the abacus is cheaper.
Yes, and where is the serial port!
Sjeez!
Trolling?That's your takeaway from that? You equate the usefulness of a serial port in 2016 to the usefulness of a USB3 port, Ethernet port, DisplayPort, and SD slot combined? You think all 4 of those ports combined are collectively as obsolete as serial port?
Do you believe Apple removed the USB3 port from the MB because they believe the port is too obsolete to use?
Do you even believe what you're typing or are you just trolling?