It isn't
It's a private company
And you don't want them in the business of deciding who is "legitimate" to the point of collecting real world information about you to decide -- and then doing god knows what with that information
Drilling and solar are failures, and soon the car company will come down to Earth as no one will attain > 10% share of EVs. He wasted tens of billions all because of his Ego.A car company. A drilling company. A rocket ship company. And now, a social media company. You check the stock of Tesla lately?
and users hopefully have to be verified
What do those who are in favor of so-called heavy-handed “content moderation” say to those who are truly being harassed, silenced, chilled due the content moderation?
So your solution is censorship. I see. smhAnother echo chamber for racists and bigots, great.
Moderating content does in fact limit free speech, especially one-sided moderation which Twitter employs in only one direction.
Twitter is the biggest text-focused social media platform that doesn't really have different sub-platforms. On the other hand, with Reddit, you have sub-Reddits, with Facebook, comments are attached to a post, which is attached to a page. With Twitter, every user is basically in the same group, and there really isn't a difference between posts and comments. There are some interesting dynamics when there are fewer barriers between different communities. You see people interact with each other that probably wouldn't interact as much on a more siloed platform like Reddit.I’m still trying to figure out how important Twitter actually is. According to its users, it’s the single most important communications medium the world has ever known, but if you poll any group of people on the street, most will tell you they don’t use it. So, is it actually important, or is it just a bunch of self-important wannabes pretending their part of engaged in some great, modern world wonder? It seems more and more to just be a handful of people in an echo chamber hyping each other up and screaming at the rest of us to take them seriously.
I absolutely agree about "how to verify" and I hope, considering Musks success, he'll find a way of keeping bots and other toxic users away from the platform.I'm all in favor of not having anon accounts going bezerk, but I'd much rather just have accounts time limited on when they can post (after new account creation) and perhaps some other tools around that to quell the fake account creation and blasting
The "verified" piece I'm mixed on until I learn more about the "how" and what information is required.
Just handing over government ID information to private companies -- I take that action very seriously and hesitantly
By ‘free speech’ he actually means ‘hate speech’, of which there’s already more than enough of that on Twitter! Time for me to give up the platform I think.
Ah good old greed is alive and well in America, where if you are rich enough you can control all social media. Can’t wait to see how the platform meltdowns after this disaster.
I don't think its comical. twitter is very powerful platform.People loosing their minds over this is quite comical.
Blind loyalty like all of the obama worshipers 🙄Literally what makes you think a car company CEO can save a social media company other than the fact that he’s rich?
I’ll never understand the blind loyalty to Elon Musk.
And for all the complaints about unfairly targeting one side or another, Twitter is happy to promote more of whatever view you follow. If I click on a tweet from a MAGA type and scroll past the replies, there is a section below with dozens of more tweets from other MAGA folks.Do you have evidence to support that beyond anecdotal claims?
(loud voices of displeasure or protest don't necessarily give us good data on what's really going on)
Hate speech and incitement to violence is not ‘free speech’.
You could always have changed it right?It must be a sad and angry existence to assume one’s entire belief system from a username they made in high school.