Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Good...goooood...everything that has transpired has done so according to my design. Your friends, up there testing the Starship Booster, are walking into a trap, as is your Tesla fleet. It was *I* who allowed the Bots to know the code of the Twitter API. It is quite safe from your pitiful little band. An entire legion of my best geniuses awaits them. Oh, I'm afraid the Apple Car will be quite operational when your friends arrive.

View attachment 2121251
I would pay money to read more of this short story. Keep it going 😂
 
You didn’t think this through did you?

Musk just spent 44 billion dollars because he disagreed with what the left was doing.

And Cook chose to express his freedom of speech with his - and the Board at Apple's money - in removing ads from Musk's platform because "Musk disagreed with what the left was doing" (your words, not mine). That in itself is freedom of Speech, and Musk isn't happy with that.. nor are his followers.

Freedom of Speech works both ways, and Musk can't understand that his way isn't the only way. That's on him. If he can't deal with the fact that people can't nor will agree with him on such a public platform, then he shouldn't have dared to venture into buying it.

BL.
 
In short, “Please don’t remove Twitter from the App Store.”

Removing Twitter from the App Store :)hallelujah:) is nothing short of a death blow the company would never recover from, and Elmo knows it.
Nice fictional story there. Post it on mastodon and collect those re-toots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tgwaste
Well its probably a good idea to keep friendly with Musk. If he keeps burning his wealth like he has with Twitter, Apple might get their wish to be in the car business really cheap one day.
They can call it the Melon Husk.
 
I like Apple but dislike the use of their overreach into censorship. As a private company, I fully agree that they can legally do what they want, but that doesn't mean it's right.

I appreciate what Musk has accomplished but dislike his ego and his narcissistic tendencies. He seems to have hurt his (private) investors by starting a war with the political left. Trump needs to stick with Truth Social or he will hurt his own investors. Asymmetric risk profile = nothing to gain but lots to loose.

Basically, I'd prefer if tech companies stuck to selling products and left the politics to the lawmakers. In business there is a general rule that talking politics with customers only hurts you.
So you think Elon should stop telling people to vote Republican, then?
 
Doubtful. Tim flexed hard and you guys clearly missed it. Tim made Musk come to him. Musk basically apologized and cleared up the "misunderstanding" without Tim saying a word. Tim bossed up and didn't take shots over the internet. Tim wanted to look him in the eyes....

That is just fantasy delusion. You'd have to be rabidly political to be talking like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LD517


Twitter CEO Elon Musk today met with Apple CEO Tim Cook at the Apple Park campus in Cupertino, California, according to a tweet shared by Musk this afternoon.

Apple-Park-View.jpeg

Musk thanked Cook for taking him around Apple's headquarters, with no mention of what the two might have discussed. The meeting comes just after Musk on Monday claimed that Apple has "mostly stopped" offering ads on Twitter, and that Apple had threatened to "withhold Twitter from its App Store."


Musk said that Apple has been "making moderation demands," though he did not go into detail on what Apple might have said about moderation. Twitter has been undergoing rapid change since Musk's October takeover, and many employees who handled moderation and policy creation have been fired or have left the company.

Apple has cracked down on other social networking apps for lax moderation policies, such as Parler, so there is real danger that Twitter and Apple could end up in a major dispute should Twitter fail to adequately handle inappropriate content. Twitter has already reinstated more than 62,000 suspended accounts, including that of former U.S. President Donald Trump, and it is not yet clear if that will be problematic.

Apple and Twitter could also run into issues over the Twitter Blue subscription. Platformer this week said Twitter is delaying the launch of the Twitter Blue service as it seeks a way to avoid Apple's 30 percent cut on iOS devices.

The video shared by Musk features the Apple Park duck pond, which has previously been seen in Apple videos and photographs captured by employees.

Update: Musk says that he and Cook resolved a misunderstanding about Twitter potentially being removed from the App Store, which Cook said Apple had not considered.



Article Link: Elon Musk Meets With Apple CEO Tim Cook Amid Claims of Twitter App Store Dispute [Updated]
Musk is such a toxic person. I don’t know what show is worse, the kardashians or musk.
 
How exactly was he “inciting”? Is there a standard for this, or does it change based on the person? Case in point — if a politician says that we must defend our democracy, and then later says that an entire political party is a threat to democracy — would you consider this to be “inciting”? Because if I’m tasked to defend something and am told that certain people are a direct threat to it, couldn’t some people interpret this as cause to use violence if necessary? Wouldn’t this be “inciting” violence?
That’s a good question.
1) check the ruling on the impeachment
2) check the ruling on Twitter.

It wasn’t my definition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
I like Apple but dislike the use of their overreach into censorship. As a private company, I fully agree that they can legally do what they want, but that doesn't mean it's right.

I appreciate what Musk has accomplished but dislike his ego and his narcissistic tendencies. He seems to have hurt his (private) investors by starting a war with the political left. Trump needs to stick with Truth Social or he will hurt his own investors. Asymmetric risk profile = nothing to gain but lots to loose.

Basically, I'd prefer if tech companies stuck to selling products and left the politics to the lawmakers. In business there is a general rule that talking politics with customers only hurts you.
What overreach?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
I don't see what the issue is here. Advertising, branding, and marketing are business decisions, and Apple has every right to make those decisions. If Apple doesn't want an ad for their latest iPad featured next to a conspiracy rant about jewish space lasers, then so be it. Apple might view that as poor product placement. Disney isn't advertising the upcoming release of the Little Mermaid in Playboy. Both Disney and Apple know their customers and fiercely protect their brands. Advertising is their call.

As for apps, this was much to do about nothing. Apple has always carefully curated their App Store, and they have every right to do so. They don't allow porn apps. Why? Because they don't want people browsing through the App Store being inundated with certain images. Apple knows some of their customers aren't bothered by this content, and Apple knows that there are others that don't want to see it in the App Store....even if they watch it in their browser. This policy might actually cost Apple some revenue, but Apple wants to protect its brand. So, they made a business decision to not allow certain apps on their platform. If Apple decides that an app is not compatible with their marketing strategy, they aren't obligated to let it on their platform. At this time, it sounds like Apple doesn't intend to remove Twitter, but if it becomes a cesspool of hate, they have every right to remove it from the App Store.

Now, any decision Apple makes will have consequences that might gain or lose customers. Apple and their shareholders will have to live with those results.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Detnator
  • Delisting Twitter from the App Store when the app is in compliance with developer testing criteria is absurd.
  • Ending advertising on Twitter, by Apple, is an example of exercising their free speech rights. Apple has no interest in poisoning the brand to prop up a zealot whose world views run 180 degrees counter to Steve Jobs, Steve Wosniak, and the actual corporate legal documents of Apple as an entity.
  • Apple collaborating with Tesla on the upcoming Apple CarPlay [Car Console/Dash integration] being developed for 3rd party OEMs in the auto industry has nothing to do with Twitter and that albatross around Musk's neck. That is what Tim will have cleared up with Musk if he wants to collaborate with Apple now and in the future.
 
I don't see what the issue is here. Advertising, branding, and marketing are business decisions, and Apple has every right to make those decisions. If Apple doesn't want an ad for their latest iPad featured next to a conspiracy rant about jewish space lasers, then so be it. Apple might view that as poor product placement. Disney isn't advertising the upcoming release of the Little Mermaid in Playboy. Both Disney and Apple know their customers and fiercely protect their brands. Advertising is their call.

As for apps, this was much to do about nothing. Apple has always carefully curated their App Store, and they have every right to do so. They don't allow porn apps. Why? Because they don't want people browsing through the App Store being inundated with certain images. Apple knows some of their customers aren't bothered by this content, and Apple knows that there are others that don't want to see it in the App Store....even if they watch it in their browser. This policy might actually cost Apple some revenue, but Apple wants to protect its brand. So, they made a business decision to not allow certain apps on their platform. If Apple decides that an app is not compatible with their marketing strategy, they aren't obligated to let it on their platform. At this time, it sounds like Apple doesn't intend to remove Twitter, but if it becomes a cesspool of hate, they have every right to remove it from the App Store.

Now, any decision Apple makes will have consequences that might gain or lose customers from these business decisions. Apple and their shareholders will have to live with those results.
I agree with what you’ve said, however Apple have not said they are considering removing Twitter from their App Store. Or at least I have seen nothing where they have said this.

There are lots of anti-Apple/Tim & Pro Musk people on here who have continued Musks fantasy statement, but there is zero evidence to suggest this has actually happened. And those people who propagate that fantasy are quite animate and angry about yelling "Freedom". Personally I’m not a fan of lies and misinformation, but this is a melting pot of ideas. I’m a fan of Macrumors, but this has never been called MacFacts. Certain people need to remember this.

I like fantasy as much as anyone, but I will leave it to the Netflix/Disney Channel to do this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Absolutely.

He should focus on products and not politics. He can vote for whatever and whomever he wants but his position in his companies makes him a representative of those companies. He should keep it to himself.

Should Tim Cook and Apple employees stop donating to Democrats?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LD517
I believe Apple crossed the line from impartial mediator to censoring speech they disagree with.

Free speech is only free if you allow that which you disagree with to be heard and expressed.

I wrote Tim Cool when they banned the swastika. And, I’m a proud Jew. It always starts with censoring “the other guy” but nearly always ends up censoring whatever “they” disagree with.
When did they do that?

I'll tel you a secret. Apple did not interfere with Twitter. It’s a rumour. Started by Musk. No one has said it’s true except those who can’t tell fiction from facts.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.