As the CDC has very clearly said, VAERS data is basically useless for drawing any kinds of conclusion. It's made for scientists to find possible areas of research to find actual adverse effects. It relies on self reporting and has a history of anti-vax patients and care providers filling in inaccurate or unverifiable information. Placebo or nocebo effects can also significantly affect the data. Even if we presume all the data was accurately reported, it's still correlation and not causation, making it impossible to say what was actually caused by the vaccine vs what was something that would have happened anyway.Well, you only need to look on the CDC website at the Vaccine Adverse events. In just 6 months 384,270 adverse events have been logged there along with 4,812 deaths from the vaccine.
We'll have to just go ahead and close down every internet forum ever, thenFor the good of mankind Twitter needs to be shut down. A lot of idiots pretending as intellectuals shape public opinion to divide our societies.
And TBH… his cars are yesterdays news. Poor build quality, unfulfilled promises and boring. Here in CA, I see probably 30+ of them a day… all the same and bland.
Hard pass
The appallingly rich (should) have that effect.I can't bear Elon.
Just can't.
Twitter’s policies censor accurate information in favor of propaganda.Equally, there are a lot of idiots spreading dangerous misinformation, lies, fake news, hatred all in “non-intellectual (or even pseudo-intellectual)” ways.
Pray tell. Why do you find this interesting?
You are very business minded, right? I can just sense the business mindednesses in you. Have you ever considered that what Twitter does isn’t censoring, but rather, not alienating the majority of users? If Twitter allows say for example photos of dead bodies, etc., some people will be offended by this, right? Heck, even you might be offended. So, what is a business to do? There must be policies that cater to majority of users, and have them be returning customers, right? Customers because after all, Twitter is not a platform, but a business.Twitter’s policies censor accurate information in favor of propaganda.
Have you ever considered that what Twitter does isn’t censoring, but rather, not alienating the majority of users?
Pray tell. Why do you find this interesting?
You are very business minded, right? I can just sense the business mindednesses in you. Have you ever considered that what Twitter does isn’t censoring, but rather, not alienating the majority of users? If Twitter allows say for example photos of dead bodies, etc., some people will be offended by this, right? Heck, even you might be offended. So, what is a business to do? There must be policies that cater to majority of users, and have them be returning customers, right? Customers because after all, Twitter is not a platform, but a business.
I am sure this forum has rules, too. I think no political talk is one of them. How come you don’t have issues with this?
Ultimately, I think you benefit financially from Elon’s hype, just as Elon does.
I'm glad you brought this up..
I'm not sure why people think it would be desirable to have an "anything goes" Twitter.
That is a business that will flat out die and the only thing left will be the most unsavory characters imaginable.
Not surprising to me. Owning a media company is like owning a sports team to those with the bucks.Was hearing some talk on the news today that $b$ were not buying media companies. One of those was an article (op-ed) from WaPo.
Then saw this and checked (Googled) on some of them.
Teenagers and men in the twenties have had heart attacks all the time in the past. Nothing new, certainly nothing to do with the jab.As the CDC has very clearly said, VAERS data is basically useless for drawing any kinds of conclusion. It's made for scientists to find possible areas of research to find actual adverse effects. It relies on self reporting and has a history of anti-vax patients and care providers filling in inaccurate or unverifiable information. Placebo or nocebo effects can also significantly affect the data. Even if we presume all the data was accurately reported, it's still correlation and not causation, making it impossible to say what was actually caused by the vaccine vs what was something that would have happened anyway.