Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am not a part of either political party in the U.S. However, there is definitely anecdotal evidence that Twitter and other social media platforms have suspended and banned people for political opinions/ideas. This is wrong and bad for society no matter what side is being banned Or suspended. The problem here is that Twitter has never embraced a philosophy of who they are. Are they the public town square, or are they a company to disseminate news and information, or what are they? They want it both ways: They want to be and open forum for everybody while still maintaining tight control over the speech on the platform. That just doesn’t work. If Musk is successful I hope that Twitter can truly embrace free speech and stop with the namby pamby excuses for its banning of some information and people while others are allowed.
 
You cannot unthink a though. Even if Musk did that, it would take weeks for replacements to pop up. All he would have achieved is burn unprecedented amounts of money. And Musk isn't an idiot - he's a con artist. So somehow he thinks he'll make a buck out of this. And he probably will.

Social media is here, and it's here to stay, and no Elon or Batman will change anything about that. Now society has to figure out how to actually incorporate it without tearing itself asunder. Censorship - of any kind - is no sustainable way. No censorship of any kind is also no solution, that's 4chan. I have no answer to this conundrum, and I believe nobody has, except that maybe a society has to be so rigid to suffer through the noise and unpleasantness that most people are idiots in one way or another, while having rules enough people can agree upon what is absolutely beyond "personal opinion". But most certainly Musk will not magically save society from itself buy making a high stake, high publicity play for Twitter.

Yep, a true con artist. It's not like millions of Tesla's are being produced and SpaceX is ferrying crew and cargo to the ISS and are the only company that lands and re-uses boosters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Black Lives Matter spent an entire year burning, looting, and murdering resulting in over $2 billion worth of damages and dozens dead and are not only celebrated on platforms like Twitter but celebrated by publishers like Twitter.

So what do you want to do? Ban them or "unban" others who have done similar things with different motivations?

This thread is the perfect example why there can never be working AND uncensored media and why Twitter and Co were a stupid idea from day one.

Or maybe do something else:

1. personal account, limited to 100 followers, no retweets, no bots just the place to plan grandma's birthday
2. public account, no politics, just the place to promote your music of your fishing club
3. political account, you can say whatever you want as long as can prove it and yes you can be sued over anything you can't

Would still be a s##tshow, you'd still have plenty people bending the rules and plenty more whining about how it is unfair......
 
Hopefully this doesn't happen. I don't use it, but the idea of someone happy to invent their own fake news owning a major social media platform is scary.
Here is a crazy thought: Tesla doesn’t have a PR dept anymore. What if Elon’s big move is to turn Twitter into Tesla’s PR dept?
 
Yep, a true con artist. It's not like millions of Tesla's are being produced and SpaceX is ferrying crew and cargo to the ISS and are the only company that lands and re-uses boosters.
Millions of cars that yet have to deliver on features promised years ago. A vacuum tube train that isn't a train and not in a vaccum. A truly boring company making tunnels nobody needed for close the same cost as everyone else.

Musk is constantly claiming to "revolutionize" the world, and people buy it, while all he does is make very smart sales pitches while maintaining the veneer of being some kind of genius. Dude is smart, and dude knows how to use his persona, you can't take that from him, but that doesn't change the fact that SpaceX is probably his only endeavor that actually "did" something, and how that will pan out is yet to be seen.
 
If he purchases Twitter, I think it is with the intention that it will be used as the messenger platform for his car business. The cars AI could send and recieve messages abot car performance, car problems, traffic problems, call for help, get location information updates of places where they are driving through or close by, the list is endless. The problem at the moment is all of this would have to be done using a 3rd party messaging system of which Musk would have to pay a license to use. With twitter, it comes ready made with all the hardware and software he would need to make it work with the cars. This way he does not have to pay money to 3rd party for licenses to use their hardware or software, he does not have to pay people to build a messaging system for him.

A lot of stuff that is on twitter is from people using an app on their mobile phone where they have been out and about, seen something and felt the need to put it on twitter, for example, a road accident causing delays, someone has seen a celeb out and about, someone has seen a new vechicle, but instead of using an app on a mobile phone to do it, they could do it directly from the car. It's a possibility.
 
I don't know what his plans are for twitter, and I really don't care.
Twitter, facebook, all of those are just toxicity on the internet. Yes there are good things there, but way too much bad ration wise.
Whatever he will do with twitter, couldn't make twitter any worse. The islands of good things in those sites/apps will stay as they are. The toxic unless changed, will just stay toxic, maybe less maybe more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jase1125 and hpr7
Moderator Note:

Quite a few posts discussing the political aspects of this story have been removed from the thread. Please keep the comments regarding politics, religion, and social issues (PRSI) out of the thread.
 
It's crazy how all his tweets have to be approved by an attorney due to the how they sway the market.
 
Millions of cars that yet have to deliver on features promised years ago. A vacuum tube train that isn't a train and not in a vaccum. A truly boring company making tunnels nobody needed for close the same cost as everyone else.

Musk is constantly claiming to "revolutionize" the world, and people buy it, while all he does is make very smart sales pitches while maintaining the veneer of being some kind of genius. Dude is smart, and dude knows how to use his persona, you can't take that from him, but that doesn't change the fact that SpaceX is probably his only endeavor that actually "did" something, and how that will pan out is yet to be seen.
I think you are hugely discrediting how he got EVs to become mainstream and forced the major auto makers to pivot into making EVs. Tesla’s influence on the auto industry is the same as SpaceX’s influence in the commercial rocket industry.
 
Millions of cars that yet have to deliver on features promised years ago. A vacuum tube train that isn't a train and not in a vaccum. A truly boring company making tunnels nobody needed for close the same cost as everyone else.

Musk is constantly claiming to "revolutionize" the world, and people buy it, while all he does is make very smart sales pitches while maintaining the veneer of being some kind of genius. Dude is smart, and dude knows how to use his persona, you can't take that from him, but that doesn't change the fact that SpaceX is probably his only endeavor that actually "did" something, and how that will pan out is yet to be seen.

The only feature that is missing is FSD and it's not like it doesn't exist, it's simply not yet good enough. He's not even working on hyperloop. That nobody needed is not a fact, it's your opinion.

Currently there would be no EV revolution in the auto industry without Tesla paving the way. SpaceX has already revolutionized the space industry, there's nothing that has yet to pan out.
 
I sure hope not - the dude is massively overvalued. He doesn't live on some moral high ground, he's a market manipulator that wants to control the narrative. From silencing his own employees to racist practices at his facilities, he is not this good guy looking to help society. He's a rich kid who wants a bully pulpit. I seriously hope the US stops fetishizing these wannabe autocrats.
 
Hate to break it to all of you, but the problem isn’t Twitter, (or Facebook). Those platforms are just microphones.

The problem is people.
Nuke Facebook and Twitter and build a new social website - and the same problems will arise.
Completely agree. I would like to see a social media company like Twitter take on more of a Reddit model: let the people using the site vote on what is good content and what isn’t. While there would still be complaints (when isn’t there online), it would allow users to decide what is important information and what isn’t rather than algorithms and gatekeepers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.