Elon will eventually kill Tesla the way he killed Twitter.
Space X? Give him time, he just got started.
Space X? Give him time, he just got started.
Which can still happen even if you block them because they can have multiple accounts?You don’t see them but they can still jump on you post and trash and harass or insult you on your tweets?
Lucky my account is on generated iCloud Mask my Email. I can just terminate that account.Make sure you turn off all notifications because it will keep emailing you updates.
Google’s seems pretty unequivocal that users are able to block each other, though.I don't think you understood what you highlighted.
"the ability to block abusive users from the service"
that's not the same as blocking a user from interacting with you. 🤦♂️
not unequivocal but closer.Google’s seems pretty unequivocal that users are able to block each other, though.
If someone wants to go to that trouble, sure, and I can block those too. My main goal in blocking someone isn’t so much that they’re not able to see my content — my main profile is public so all it takes is switching to a private browsing window, not even a second account — but that they’re not able to interact with it. I block, mute, or both depending on the account.You do know that most people have multiple accounts where they can switch and see your content after being blocked, right?
If someone wants to go to that trouble, sure, and I can block those too. My main goal in blocking someone isn’t so much that they’re not able to see my content — my main profile is public so all it takes is switching to a private browsing window, not even a second account — but that they’re not able to interact with it. I block, mute, or both depending on the account.
I’m no celebrity, so I’m not worried about people profiting off the back of my content (which is how Blue payouts work and why a good chunk of the content in the “for you” tab is now obvious engagement bait from “verified” users), but rather as a person I’d rather someone who dislikes me simply not be able to spew garbage in my replies unchecked.
Google specifies that users must be able to block UGC and users though. Muting and blocking have existed on social media platforms long enough that if Google viewed muting as sufficient to “block” a user, they presumably would have said so.not unequivocal but closer.
one can argue blocking from seeing particular user generated content which a mute can achieve.
Muting for me is largely for the purpose of keeping up appearances where I need to continue to follow someone I don’t like for the sake of not starting drama among mutual friends or at work. That’s fine, doesn’t mean I need to deal with seeing their content.I mean the accounts are practically unlimited.
Also neat trick: set account to private, post a nasty reply, and unprivate the account. That way the user like you never sees it in notifications but it is listed under as a reply. So unless someone else interacts with it and unless you're checking your content daily, you won't know it happened.
And *even* then, someone can still link to your content as a quote post and people who follow that account will click on the post and start writing nasty things at you.
Blocking only encourages trolls to work extra hard into making it an unpleasant experience for the person they're attacking. Muting doesn't let them know you're not reading and it wastes their precious seconds on earth writing things you won't ever see. Possibly a win win situation as you dont see their content and they think you saw their content.
That's not blocking at all. That's hiding people from your own feed. Not even close to the same thing, especially if people are stalking or harassing you.I think mute might fulfill these requirements? You can block (mute) people you dont want to see.
I deactivated my account last month. It’s becoming obvious to me that he is hell bent on killing off the platform one moronic decision at a time.
And more importantly is X Gon’ Give It To Ya? Lol 😂What if someone X’s my X. Can I re-X their X before they X me?