Muting for me is largely for the purpose of keeping up appearances where I need to continue to follow someone I don’t like for the sake of not starting drama among mutual friends or at work. That’s fine, doesn’t mean I need to deal with seeing their content.
Blocking is “I want absolutely nothing to do with you” or in a select few cases “I need absolutely nothing to do with you.” The latter case is as in, there’s someone against whom I have a permanent restraining order. That kind of thing.
Let me spell this out for you:Then post "I want absolutely nothing to do with you" then mute. Let them waste their seconds of life on earth trying to get under your skin and you won't waste anymore time with that person.
If I only mute him, there’s absolutely nothing stopping him
That’s because blocking makes it more difficult — not impossible, but more difficult — for him to find me
Same. His tweets and replies to them were like being forced to read 4chan drivel.Yes, I'm one of them. I have no interested looking at his tweet, even the content has no relation to what I browse like Weather, Stormchase stuff.
Stalking? Uh, it's not difficult to create an alt locked account and follow youThat's not blocking at all. That's hiding people from your own feed. Not even close to the same thing, especially if people are stalking or harassing you.
There probably is, actually — social networks are known to flag rapid account creation (or any rapid action, really) from identical/similar IP/email addresses for possible abuse. Either way, blocking any future accounts I come across inhibits his access to me and — again, this is an important component in context — to people I know. Muting would allow him to reply to me, and people I know, fully unchecked. Blocking is an important tool because it inhibits harassment and defamation. Nothing’s perfect, and nothing needs to be, but providing users with the tools they need to feel safe online is generally viewed as important, last I checked.There's nothing stopping him from creating another account. And another. And another.
Mute him and stop thinking about it.
This is comical. Certainly not common; most will only go through the trouble of creating several before either getting tired of it or flagged for abuse by whatever platform they’re creating these accounts on.Harassing? Trolls have hundreds of twitter accounts.
There probably is, actually — social networks are known to flag rapid account creation (or any rapid action, really) from identical/similar IP/email addresses for possible abuse. Either way, blocking any future accounts I come across inhibits his access to me and — again, this is an important component in context — to people I know. Muting would allow him to reply to me, and people I know, fully unchecked. Blocking is an important tool because it inhibits harassment and defamation. Nothing’s perfect, and nothing needs to be, but providing users with the tools they need to feel safe online is generally viewed as important, last I checked.
Again, I hope you never know what this feels like because you clearly haven’t the slightest clue despite what I’ve shared here. Even after therapy you can’t just “stop thinking about it.” Trust me, I’ve had that idea and even tried it. It doesn’t work.
There’s a reason why basically every social media platform offers the ability to block users.
No, it’s not because Apple and Google force them to (as has been discussed at length here, maybe they do, maybe they don’t). It’s an important safety and privacy feature that in 2023 is considered baseline functionality for any public communication app.
And hey, you know that you can also just admit that you, due to maybe having a more comfortable life experience than somebody else, simply didn’t anticipate a possible consequence of some action, right? It happens sometimes, and that’s okay!
Yes, even the Human God-King and Knower of All Things Elon Musk can be wrong sometimes, too, as hard of a concept as that is for some to grasp.
Not going to post the link here, but there are plenty of *Certaincoloredhat* websites to buy thousands of Twitter/X accounts for cheap via BTC. Especially old Twitter accounts that were created over 5 years ago.This is comical. Certainly not common; most will only go through the trouble of creating several before either getting tired of it or flagged for abuse by whatever platform they’re creating these accounts on.
A privileged CEO living in his wealthy bubble doesn’t think or care about that. Claiming there’s no need for content moderation on his platform because of his usual rhetoric that his views and those of conservatives are being repressed. It’s really sad.Let me spell this out for you:
The person against whom I have that restraining order blackmailed me. He is currently sitting in prison on an 11-year sentence for what he did to me and others. It is in my own best interest to block any accounts of his that I become aware of basically for the rest of my life. That’s because blocking makes it more difficult — not impossible, but more difficult — for him to find me and people I know (because that specifically was a component of the blackmail).
If I only mute him, there’s absolutely nothing stopping him from hopping into my replies and carrying out exactly what he wanted to carry out against me years ago. Yes, there’d eventually be consequences for his violating the restraining order if he at any point contacted me directly — which he wouldn’t necessarily have to do — but that doesn’t mean immense damage can’t be done in the meantime.
I hope you never have to know what it feels like to need to block someone like I do.
It's a bit more complicated than that.Mute and stop thinking about that person. They won't know you muted. Let that person waste precious seconds/minutes/hours on earth typing out things you'll never see.
Did it with Facebook a couple years ago and couldn't be happier. Also did it with twitter in 2012, but that was just a parody account of the Romney/Ryan 2012 campaign. My life is richer without those parasites.Seriously thinking about ditching X and requiring them to delete my data.
How would that work? The app would have the power to block someone from the service entirely? What's the point of that? Would it have the power to block the user who downloaded it, or would the user be able to block some other user from the service entirely? The former sounds like a useless app, and the latter more like an admin app. Neither scenario is how any of these apps have worked in the past so I'm pretty sure the app is supposed to allow the user to block other users from accessing their account, like most people here are interpreting it.As much as I love a good gotcha, “from the service” implies blocking them entirely from a platform, not users blocking other users.