Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As an actual qualified engineer (MSc Microelectronics) who now works in the software industry I would suggest at this point that calling anyone in the software market an engineer is a complete joke. It's a fashion show cargo cult, not a discipline which should be adhered to. In maturity terms we are still in the pre-victorian industrial era with exploding steam engines crashing through stations onto the street, people jumping off the Eiffel Tower with a blanket attached to them and giant airships turning into fireballs. There is a very long way to go before it could be considered anywhere near engineering.

This denigrates some of the academics from the Bell Labs, Berkeley and theoretical computer science side of things so I would like to entirely exclude them from this comment.

software engineering is a subset of engineering. your arbitrary standard for what is an engineer isn't really all that relevant.

if calling a software engineer an engineer degrades the title of engineering, then so be it, but it's still engineering.
 
He's the biggest fraud in the history of business. Guy has literally done nothing. Didn't even found Tesla.

Hes basically a business celebrity who makes money because he's a business celebrity.

Tell us the mainstream media sets your opinion without telling us the mainstream media sets your opinion lmao.

Will you still be posting these edgy opinions to Twitter once he owns it?
 
Well that'd be literally stupid and I also don't believe it for a second. It is like changing the definition of "wet" to mean "dry".
Sorry to inform you that using “literally” in a figurative sentence is perfectly acceptable, despite what internet-pseudo-intellectuals love to repeat to feel smart.

It can very well reinforce an obviously figurative sentence, like in “I laughed so hard my head literally exploded”.
Or it can make more ambiguous a figurative sentence, like in “I laughed so hard I literally peed all my pants”, since the context almost aways clarifies that it didn’t literally happen.

Think about it for more than three seconds: all figuratively said sentences have a different literal meaning that they’re supposed to express and the word “literally” only reinforces it and changes nothing.
The only exception I’d consider is when you add “literally” to a figurative saying. That would be expected to switch the meaning of the sentence to literal. Like in “my screwdriver literally isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed”.
But if I solve two problems at once and say “I literally killed two birds with a stone” but no bird is involved, it would be a poor use of the word.
Still grammatically acceptable and not the war crime that snob people on the internet claim it is, especially in informal contexts like… comments on the internet.
 
Last edited:
The people trying to gatekeep the title "engineer" are hilarious. Just because you or your girlfriend or wife or boyfriend or whoever got an engineering degree, doesn't make you any more of an engineer than Elon. A degree is a piece of paper. You can learn without going to a university.
 
  • Like
Reactions: geartau
The people trying to gatekeep the title "engineer" are hilarious. Just because you or your girlfriend or wife or boyfriend or whoever got an engineering degree, doesn't make you any more of an engineer than Elon. A degree is a piece of paper. You can learn without going to a university.

The people trying to gatekeep the title "MD" are hilarious. Just because you or your girlfriend or wife or boyfriend or whoever got a medical degree, doesn't make them any more of a doctor than Elon. A degree is a peice of paper. You can learn without going to a university.

I have a title in the medical field, it's not MD or nurse, but I can get in a hell of a lot of trouble for saying I am what I am without a degree and the state & federal license and various certifications that back it up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: RuralJuror
What are you getting out of spending your afternoon doing this? Do you think Elon is going to reward you in some way?
Whose going to reward you for attacking? This is just a weird take. We all get off the narcissistic joy of sharing our nonsense takes. That’s what the internet is for and we all do it for free - hardly need Musk or anyone else paying us. The frisson of sharing opinions is enough😂
 
Twitter replaced RSS for me for following/consuming news. When this deal closes, I'll need to find something else. I will however enjoy watching Musk try to remove moderation and subsequently face app store rejections and regulator fines.
Explain regulator fines? I didn’t know the govt could regulate social media that way in the US.
 
Explain regulator fines? I didn’t know the govt could regulate social media that way in the US.

it has nothing to do with it being social media, it's for how the business is run, regardless of what said company does as a business.
 
Come on everybody, let’s take all the seriousness down a few pegs, heck, all the pegs: this show is brought to us by Twitter AND Musk, can’t get any better.
Prepare all the popcorns you have around and enjoy 🍿
 
He's so weird. His fanboys are even weirder, people who are susceptible to personality worship. It reminds me of Steve Jobs fanboys.
Neurotypical people are always calling Autistic people weird just because they are different than they are :rolleyes:
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: inkswamp
Sorry to inform you that using “literally” in a figurative sentence is perfectly acceptable, despite what internet-pseudo-intellectuals love to repeat to feel smart.

It can very well reinforce an obviously figurative sentence, like in “I laughed so hard my head literally exploded”.
Or it can make more ambiguous a figurative sentence, like in “I laughed so hard I literally peed all my pants”, since the context almost aways clarifies that it didn’t literally happened.

Think about it for more than three seconds: all figuratively said sentences have a different literal meaning that they’re supposed to express and the word “literally” only reinforces it and changes nothing.
The only exception I’d consider is when you add “literally” to a figurative saying. That would be expected to switch the meaning of the sentence to literal. Like in “my screwdriver literally isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed”.
But if I solve two problems at once and say “I literally killed two birds with a stone” but no bird is involved, it would be a poor use of the word.
Still grammatically acceptable and not the war crime that snob people on the internet claim it is, especially in informal contexts like… comments on the internet.
Lol. Like I said. Over my head. I’m that pseudo internet intellectual half paying attention to a thread and making wild claims. 😬
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.