Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This all might be true, but Apple isn't going to keep on making the mini 4 just to suit your flying needs. They're only going to keep making it and/or upgrading it if and only if it's profitable for them to do so.

And that’s where this post comes in demonstrating that the iPad mini is doing quite well.

'Entry-Level' 13-inch MacBook, Redesigned iPad Pros With Faster 18W USB-C Charger Coming in September, But no New iPad Mini

Apple knows the 6.5” iPhone is not going to be a suitable replacement for the mini, and the thriving market for it. I’m sure they will watch the sales closely to see if the 6.5” begins to canibalize the mini market, but I somehow doubt it.
 
All I ask of Apple is to update two components - 1. SoC to A12 and 4GB LPDDR4, 2. iPhone 8 camera. Mark it up to $600 as starting price with 128GB flash. 512GB version $800. With LTE $990.99.
[doublepost=1534628797][/doublepost]
You'll be able to buy a 6.5" 'tablet' soon for the low price of $999.

To small and not 4:3 ratio!
 
It’s the processor that’s caused the delay according to rumour, Apple wanted Intel’s 10nm but due to Intel delaying it until 2019 they have decided to go with the 14nm.
This thing is going to play out like the late 2016 MBP did. It was replaced about seven months after release by the mid 2017 version. At the rumored $1200 price point, this new 13" MacBook is just going to be a re-skinned version of the current no-TB MBP, likely with the wedge design it should've had all along. Branding the 15W no-TB model a Pro was a mistake and they're fixing that now it appears. I have the 2016 version and will wait until at least 2019 to get the chip they wanted to include but couldn't get from Intel in time for this year's release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave245
Apple’s product lines are becoming a mess!

yes they are becoming a mess thanks to a minority of people who wish there was a macbook air refresh or an ipad mini . while we are at it, add the iphone SE to the mix and the mac mini

mind you this is rumor season and it does not make sense for apple to refresh or relasess any of the above . if apple listened to what devices their customers want, it indeed would be a fragmented mess . Thank God they have a stern vision of what products they want moving forward

lets face it, there will be no macbook air, there will be no ipad mini or any other old device people are wishing for . let it go and move on, apple has done that already

the sad thing about these products is that next year, these idiots will regurgitate the conversation of these ancient devices that have no logical sense in modern society

you cant afford a macbook? you have no business buying one,
 
Apple is never going to make a $200 Chromebook equivalent. They’ve ceded that market segment in education. It’s either iPad or nothing.

In a sense, Apple is competing not by further reinforcing the status quo, but by trying to get people to rethink what education in schools ought to look like. If you are content with typing in google docs in the classroom all day, then get a chrome book. If you are interested in trying to do more, consider an iPad for the blend of portability, ease of use and wide selection of apps.
 
So, where’s the MAC-Mini and the rest of the MAC lineup or are they all headed to oblivion...?
Users prefer smartphones 50:1 and tablet computers 10:1 (and even notebooks 4:1) over desktops. Still, Apple updates iMac ever year.

Mac mini is rumored to be updated this year but, this could be the last update for the mini. By far, Mac customers prefer laptops and iMac over the mini.

Mac Pro has been announced to ship next year, but like iMac Pro there is almost no home/consumer demand for Mac workstations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yvan256
That’s a good point, almost forgot about it. That was recent, maybe with the Note 9 launch? I saw the tech media make a big deal about Samsung beating Apple to market with their multiple device charger, when in reality its just a device with 2 isolated charging spots. Not a pad where devices can be placed in multiple orientations and locations.

Yep. Exactly. It's not the same at all. I work at Verizon, and I was having to explain to my coworkers how it's not the same. There have been wireless charging pads like theirs for awhile, now.
 
No new iMacs? The massive bezels are starting to look really dated on the current iMacs. I need a new desktop computer and I like Mac OS, but the massive bezels on the iMac and old design put me off. An updated design is overdue!
 
Taxation is theft.

Taxation is theft if it's taken from normal working class people that don't have much money, but big rich companies like Apple should be taxed. Isn't that how America was founded? Then the bankers changed it so even working class people had to pay tax.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pipis2010
Taxation is theft if it's taken from normal working class people that don't have much money, but big rich companies like Apple should be taxed. Isn't that how America was founded? Then the bankers changed it so even working class people had to pay tax.

There should be no corporate taxes at all because it is just a hidden tax on consumers. I own a business and it pays taxes. When I do my business accounting, I have expenses for such things as website hosting, payroll, taxes, rent, etc. They are all just expenses to me and we have to price our product high enough to cover those expenses. Thus, my customers are really paying my business taxes without ever seeing it directly. It's a way for the government to tax more without people really knowing it is happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prpolo
Apple's "product" is figuring out how to exchange something as cheap as possible for your $999.

The "product" is composed of psychology and marketing, not technology.
 
Who needs a iPad mini?
I do. It is the perfect travel companion. And, please, don't start me with the humongous phones as iPad mini replacements. I prefer a small phone and a small tablet for my daily commute and travel needs. The big iPads are ideal for indoors only (with the exception of specialised uses).
 
Apple's "product" is figuring out how to exchange something as cheap as possible for your $999.

The "product" is composed of psychology and marketing, not technology.
Apple possesses no Jedi mind trick. Their customers are well aware that Apple offers the best combination of hardware, OS, software, usability, ecosystem, warranty, quality, privacy, security, etc. and are willing to pay for that which they value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abazigal and Prpolo
Users prefer smartphones 50:1

Except, when you plug the actual numbers into that, 4,000,000 desktops a year doesn't sound so bad (I'm using your 50:1 figure + 200M iPhone sales for the sake of argument).

Plus - I bet you an internet that most of those 4M users buy smartphones, probably tablets and maybe laptops as well. They're also likely to be the "local experts" that friends, family and colleagues turn to for computer advice. They also include a lot of people developing software and services for smartphones, tablets and laptops - and even if they're not developers they form a disproportionate part of the customer base that makes it worth while for makers of pro software and hardware to support the Mac platform.

The real stupidity is that a straightforward headless Mac desktop would be relatively cheap to develop so it wouldn't need to sell in vast quantities - it just needs to look a bit nicer than a PC thrown together from generic components and fill a strategic role to keep MacOS looking like a professional platform. Unfortunately, it sounds as if Apple think that the only thing wrong with the MacPro trashcan was the dual-GPU design and are dreaming up some new vision in razor-thin anodised aluminium (assuming they're not just stalling).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yvan256
The primary software for aviation apps is ForeFlight and is only available for iOS. It's what everybody uses. I just went to breakfast this morning with 20 pilots and 9 airplanes at a small field in Northern California. Everyone has iPads... and the software everyone uses does not really support the phone - only the iPad. Garmin has a few but they cost 4 times the price of an iPad.

I cannot blame the pilots for using this if that is all there is. But the whole situation strikes me as dangerously fragile, and untypical for how aviation otherwise presents itself (at least to laymen like myself). This sounds like an ‘accidental’ niche market that is totally dependent on a single-manufacturer product mainly designed and sold for other purposes. Are pilots prepared for the day Apple stops making this iPad? Is ForeFlight prepared?

I have no real understanding of how essential this usage is. Obviously planes were flying before the iPad, and my quick googling indicates ForeFlight is mostly an American thing. But still, even if it is mostly convenience, it seems to me that cutting down hassle in the cockpit is a good thing. And thus it seems so weird to me that there is no major effort to reduce this dependence on Apple.
 
I cannot blame the pilots for using this if that is all there is. But the whole situation strikes me as dangerously fragile, and untypical for how aviation otherwise presents itself (at least to laymen like myself). This sounds like an ‘accidental’ niche market that is totally dependent on a single-manufacturer product mainly designed and sold for other purposes. Are pilots prepared for the day Apple stops making this iPad? Is ForeFlight prepared?

I have no real understanding of how essential this usage is. Obviously planes were flying before the iPad, and my quick googling indicates ForeFlight is mostly an American thing. But still, even if it is mostly convenience, it seems to me that cutting down hassle in the cockpit is a good thing. And thus it seems so weird to me that there is no major effort to reduce this dependence on Apple.

It is not exactly required gear. The GPS in a typical small aircraft includes com/nav radios, is mounted in the panel, and is FAA approved, but costs $7-15K. Anything purpose-made will be similar because of the FAA approval process.

The iPad is more a matter of massive convenience. The biggest factor is no more paper charts, but also it uses bluetooth to connect to the ($1,000 FAA certified) bluetooth transmitter in the airplane to display traffic (other airplanes), weather and TFRs (restricted airspace) all superimposed on standard FAA charts. Panel-mounted avionics don't do that nearly as nicely and they are usually off to one side so a bit less convenient to look at.

ForeFlight and the iPad also makes it very easy to file a flight plan. The old way is to call an 800 number and read off where you are going, the route, how much fuel, how many people, what equipment you have on board etc. ForeFlight makes all that very easy by doing it in the app. The FAA even responds with your "expected route" which with one button you can load into the airplane. On my old aircraft GPS where you have to use a knob to ender location identifiers, it could take 10 minutes of twisting knobs and pushing buttons that the iPad can do with one tap. A typical route looks something like:

KAUS SLIMM V558 LLO V76 SJT V68 CNX V264 OATES KPRC

And if the older GPS in the airplane doesn't know airways (a common situation), the V558, v76, V68 and V264 can each expand into a dozen 5-character waypoints that all have to be entered by hand. Entering that one character at a time with a single knob (scrolling through the alphabet) while the engine is running and you're just sitting on the ramp is a pain.

https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/153681
 
Last edited:
What is it with Apple's resistance to updating the Mini? I think it would be a top seller. What, not enough margin?

Apple fears that such a Mini would take too much away from Phone turnover ;-)

I really hate their selling strategies – same like they did not renew the best and only Mac Book Air to newest standards (CPU, retina display, SSD) because then people take this instead of MB or MBP
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.