Dude, it’s a business.
But absolutely nowhere in the court ruling did the court state that apple had to allow Fortnite or any other app on the Appstore.Except Apple were told by both the US and EU courts that they weren’t allowed to stop or prevent developers from charging fees outside of the App Store and Apple weren’t allowed to tell developers how they presented these third party fees.
Apple at every occasion has taken the worst possible way to abide by the court rulings, using scare tactics and malicious compliance the entire time.
Apple will end up with more fines from this behaviour.
I believe Epic’s main account has been banned in the U.S. and they’re using their Swedish account to submit it.everyone saying they “shouldn’t be forced” to move to android means, they just don’t want to leave iPhone
i don’t believe Apple is allowed to ban Epic’s developer account. That’s why they’re still allowed to resubmit Fortnite
Apple doesn't own the hardware, I do.
Apple doesn't have to let 3rd parties us their platform.Nah. Apple should get their greedy fingers outta users hardware that THEY paid for. If people wanna play Fortnite on their iPhone and Epic wants to provide that why should Apple be involved.
That doesn't mean they have to let you use their store front.Except Apple were told by both the US and EU courts that they weren’t allowed to stop or prevent developers from charging fees outside of the App Store and Apple weren’t allowed to tell developers how they presented these third party fees.
Apple at every occasion has taken the worst possible way to abide by the court rulings, using scare tactics and malicious compliance the entire time.
Apple will end up with more fines from this behaviour.
Correct and Sony, et al have significant market power. Apple is popular and that popularity causes apple to be influential.No.
Gaming is looked at when their is significant cause to believe than major players are using their market power unfairly.
Microsoft's acquisition of Activision being a case in point.
Ok, seems like the above is an opinion. But we’ll see.Well I don't think a judge publicly hammering your company for failing to properly comply with a court order that was put in place to ensure fair competition is ever a good look when you headed into a trial where the same business practices are going to be litigated.
In the US it’s innocent until proven guilty. Remember: “if the app don’t fit, you must acquit”.Some of the discovery did not put some of Apple's executives off well, one of them has even been referred for criminal charges.
There is a lot of that here. But we will see what happens.You would have to be somewhat delusional to think that is good preparation for the antitrust trial, will it effect the outcome? We will have to see. They have certainly provided a ton of extra ammunition for the DOJ.
Obviously predicting the results of litigation is a fool's errand, but I remain unconvinced the DOJ action will even in make it to trial. It's a weak case that had to invent a segmented market category "premium smartphones" to even come close to meeting the market percentage threshold for antitrust action in the US. And that's before we consider the case was started under the previous administration (which to be clear, 100% should not matter, but I suspect might).You would have to be somewhat delusional to think that is good preparation for the antitrust trial, will it effect the outcome? We will have to see. They have certainly provided a ton of extra ammunition for the DOJ.
Nah.Nah. Apple should get their greedy fingers outta users hardware that THEY paid for. If people wanna play Fortnite on their iPhone and Epic wants to provide that why should Apple be involved.
You confused the Tim.It's time for a$$le to be pushed in a corner.
"think different" has definitively died, under the greed.
Not sure why everyone is praising Apple and condemning Epic Games. Honestly, both sides are in the wrong.
Epic violated Apple’s terms, so Apple has the right to remove Epic from the App Store. But the fact that Epic is effectively banned from all iPhone hardware—not just the App Store—because there are no alternative app stores, is where Apple goes too far.
Right now, Apple acts as judge, jury, and executioner by having total control over both software and hardware.
The argument that people can just “switch to Android” is weak. If Google ever chooses the same path, what options are left? Are we expected to write our own mobile operating systems?
Throw Tim Cook in prison until he realizes that the law isn't optional.
Obviously predicting the results of litigation is a fool's errand, but I remain unconvinced the DOJ action will even in make it to trial. It's a weak case that had to invent a segmented market category "premium smartphones" to even come close to meeting the market percentage threshold for antitrust action in the US. And that's before we consider the case was started under the previous administration (which to be clear, 100% should not matter, but I suspect might).
So, basically, you mean every restaurant in the world MUST offer Coca-Cola if they come and tell the owner to have it on the menu?
Is EPIC not greedy too?It's time for a$$le to be pushed in a corner.
"think different" has definitively died, under the greed.
I haven’t read through all the comments….presumably Fortnight was available in the EU? Has Apple now blocked it there? Or did Epic pull it when Apple denied their US submission? Sweeney has to know by now this is all personal.
Apple are so petty and I love it hahaha