Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
65,308
33,588


Fortnite creator Epic Games today filed a lawsuit against Google and Samsung, accusing the two companies of anticompetitive behavior that discourages Android users from downloading games and apps outside of the Google Play Store.

play-store-google.jpeg

At issue is a Samsung feature called Auto Blocker, which is designed to prevent Galaxy devices from installing applications from unauthorized sources. Enabled by default, Samsung says that Auto Blocker keeps users safe from unknown apps and malware, but it does disable sideloading.

With Auto Blocker, when users attempt to install an app from an unknown or unauthorized source, they'll receive a pop-up alert letting them know that installation was prevented. Auto Blocker can be overridden during the setup of a Galaxy device, and there is also an option to temporarily remove it. Auto Blocker was first introduced last October, and Epic Games says that the feature is in fact a "coordinated effort" to block competition in app distribution.

"Auto Blocker cements the Google Play Store as the only viable way to get apps on Samsung devices, blocking every other store from competing on a level playing field," says Epic Games.

Epic Games is accusing Samsung and Google of creating Auto Blocker with the purpose of undermining the result of the Epic Games v. Google lawsuit, where a nine-member jury agreed that Google had an app store monopoly and that Google's agreements with OEMs were anticompetitive.

When speaking to journalists earlier today (via The Verge), Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said that he did not have proof that Google and Samsung had colluded on the Auto Blocker feature, but he is hoping to find evidence during the document discovery process. He also did not ask Samsung to make Epic Games an authorized source for games.

Further, Sweeney claimed that Epic was filing the lawsuit on behalf of all developers, and not just to get Epic Games special treatment. "If we'd fought Epic v. Apple and Epic v. Google solely on the basis of Epic getting special privileges, perhaps settlement discussions with Apple and Google might have been fruitful," said Sweeney. "But if we did that, we'd be selling out all developers."

Evidence from the Epic v. Apple trial suggests that Sweeney did, at that time, seek a special deal with Apple that would not have been available to all developers. In 2020, Sweeney wrote a letter to Apple asking for permission to add support for third-party payment processors in Fortnite, and it's only when Apple said no that Epic filed a lawsuit against Apple. When questioned about this letter at trial, Sweeney confirmed that he was seeking a special deal for Fortnite and would have accepted it even if Apple didn't offer the same deal to other developers.

Sweeney has suggested multiple times that the lawsuits Epic is filing against Apple, Google, and Samsung are for all developers, but realistically, Epic Games is looking out for its own interests.

Epic Games is aiming to have the court force Samsung to remove Auto Blocker as a default device setting. Samsung in a statement to The Verge said that Auto Blocker is a security and privacy feature that users can disable at any time. "We plan to vigorously contest Epic Game's baseless claims," said Samsung. Google called the lawsuit "meritless."

Article Link: Epic Games Accuses Samsung and Google of Colluding to Prevent Sideloading on Galaxy Devices
 

Naraxus

macrumors 68020
Oct 13, 2016
2,204
8,879
"Has no evidence but is hoping to find something"

Tim Sweeny is ****ing scuzzbag in every sense of the word. As usual he wants to have his cake and eat it too.

He has done absolutely nothing to better technology
 

alexe

macrumors regular
Nov 5, 2014
239
1,543
Sure, he may be looking out for Epic's interests, but that doesn't change the fact that these lawsuits Epic has been filing have been and will be benefiting all developers.

All companies just optimize for themselves, but Epic is currently the only real counterbalance to the Apple and Google duopoly, so regardless of what the motivation is, a side effect of it is that it benefits all customers and developers.
 
Last edited:

ScottHammet

macrumors regular
Jul 22, 2011
135
120
Epic Games: Committed to making the mobile app ecosystem as unsafe as possible, for one simple reason...micro-transactions in Fortnite.

The sheer greed...the staggering lack of recognition that they are deliberately making the digital world more unsafe simply to rake in a few more bucks...it boggles the mind.
 

alexe

macrumors regular
Nov 5, 2014
239
1,543
Epic Games: Committed to making the mobile app ecosystem as unsafe as possible, for one simple reason...micro-transactions in Fortnite.

The sheer greed...the staggering lack of recognition that they are deliberately making the digital world more unsafe simply to rake in a few more bucks...it boggles the mind.

Honestly, nobody is buying that security pretense for a second. What absolute BS.

Allowing alternatives to Apple's and Google's app stores doesn't make anything any less safe. Nobody is forced to use those alternatives. Whoever feels uncomfortable downloading apps from alternative sources can simply opt to not do that, simple as that, isn't it? But the rest of the users can enjoy more freedom and more competition.

I can't believe people are still drinking Apple's and Google's Koolaid. This bogus security argument never made any sense.

People accuse Tim Sweeny and Epic of corporate greed, but Apple's and Google's hypocritical reasons for wanting to keep their app stores the only source for third-party apps are not rooted in greed? Are people really this naive?
 
Last edited:

coffeemilktea

macrumors 65816
Nov 25, 2022
1,290
5,775
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said that he did not have proof that Google and Samsung had colluded on the Auto Blocker feature, but he is hoping to find evidence during the document discovery process. He also did not ask Samsung to make Epic Games an authorized source for games.

So he's mad that he didn't get something that he never asked for, and now he's suing for things he can't prove?

This guy really loves suing other companies just for the sake of suing them, doesn't he? I hope pays his lawyers in something other than Fortnite V-Bucks. :p
 

skit911

macrumors regular
Apr 19, 2015
119
202
Toronto, Ontario
If one person is an *******, they’re an *******.

If everyone’s an *******… maybe you’re the *******.

Epic is a terrible company run by terrible people.

Say what you want about Apple, they definitely could have taken all this regulation from the EU better, but Jesus does epic cry. And cry and cry.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.