Scotty don’t!!!Scotty doesn't know
Scotty doesn't know
Scotty doesn't know
Scotty don’t!!!Scotty doesn't know
Scotty doesn't know
Scotty doesn't know
I may be wrong, but since this is a civil case, my understanding is that nobody can obligate a witness to testify or come to the court.Since he isn’t a party and isn’t an employee of a party, the point is epic will subpoena him. If he refuses to comply, a court will decide.
These are all virtual currencies , they are getting a **** load of money for something that doesn’t really cost them anything, sure there’s the initial developer cost to put the features in, but once they are in it’s just free money, i think it’s pretty bad form to complain over something like this, Epic agreed to the terms when they used apples libraries and software and gave them a platform to give every Apple user access.I wonder how much money Epic has lost? Why wouldn't they just do the 30% and get back in the store? It's the cost of doing business with Apple users. Raise the price 30% and put your stuff back in the store. Apple has had this in place for a long time.
It’s common courtesy that you don’t hand out someone’s contact data without checking with that person.Hehehe. This looks like mafia stuff. Sorry “We don’t have the phone number of our previous VIP that worked with the Jobs teams since 1992? No one knows him here, no friends, nothing ... He left and no one talks with him now, so we can’t find him even though is producing broadway shows?” What’s next? “A run to the Caribbean?”.
You are certainly wrong.I may be wrong, but since this is a civil case, my understanding is that nobody can obligate a witness to testify or come to the court.
Apple tried to throw Valve under the bus, thats was a shady move TBH. Now Forstall? Still is not the time for the second coming of Forstall, he must remain in hiding. Meanwhile, Tim can have all the drama he wants. Why can we all get along ...
Our tax dollars fund court cases: judge pay, court upkeep, building, etc. Yes, Apple and Epic's legal teams are paying for expenses, but it's when the court passes their ruling.did you reply to the right post....? Or are we just all going wildly off-topic? Who’s tax dollars?
Apple has offered to represent him. If he says he does not want to testify, can their counsel represent him in an attempt to quash the subpoena or would that be a conflict? Can Apple reimburse him for his legal expense, if he provides his own counsel or does that create a conflict for the attorney? If he is compelled to testify, given that he is no longer an employee, must he be compensated by either side for his time? If so, is there a standard rate or would it be based on his last salary?Since he isn’t a party and isn’t an employee of a party, the point is epic will subpoena him. If he refuses to comply, a court will decide.
its not real stitching, but screened on... I think it's called "skeuomorphism"That white stitching on his shirt is horrendous.
Apple has offered to represent him. If he says he does not want to testify, can their counsel represent him in an attempt to quash the subpoena or would that be a conflict? Can Apple reimburse him for his legal expense, if he provides his own counsel or does that create a conflict for the attorney? If he is compelled to testify, given that he is no longer an employee, must he be compensated by either side for his time? If so, is there a standard rate or would it be based on his last salary?
Given that he has be gone for 10 years, if your opinion, how likely would a court be to compel his testimony if he were to refuse to testify?
Hmm you’re using Forstall's version of an os (iOS)...If they use Forstall's version of Apple Maps he will never be found.
After 10 years, hard to say it’s still hisHmm you’re using Forstall's version of an os (iOS)...
I hear Epic's next step is to seek testimony from Steve Jobs...This isn't a legal battle at all. It's nothing but a publicity stunt extended for a painfully long amount of time.