Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Nah, not really. People are lazy. I'm not going to waste time going to a separate payment portal, even if the app is a couple bucks cheaper.

This is what App store revenues look like for the last few years. Apple's cut of 15-30% of in-app purchases will be diminished. This adds up to tens of billions of dollars over the foreseeable future.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/296226/annual-apple-app-store-revenue/

It's not the lazy users that drive change, but the sea of developers that will fight for every penny of their hard earned money.
 
Apple setup and developed all the infrastructure necessary for hosting and distributing apps on the AppStore but not allowing developers their own payment methods or even a link to outside payment options is very restrictive especially for content provider apps (news, music...)
Apple could charge a monthly flat fee on paid apps for hosting them on the AppStore irrespective of the app's sales price.
 
They can link to outside payment sources but that doesn't mean Apple has to make it easy to unlock the stuff you bought from outside. They could just call it back to the app and unlock it, or they could make people redeem a code and go through a whole process that just makes it harder to buy stuff unless it's in the app. Apple may have to allow people to buy outside the app, but they don't have to make it easy for people to do it.
 
But if the initial terms of the original contract are judged unlawful or unreasonable, which I thought was what Epic were pushing for the decision on?
They breached contract and lost. Its not going to be retroactive for what they did/ The judge was really clear during the case Epic went about it the wrong way and planned this out.

Apple can still choose not to allow Fortnite back as they breached TOS.
 
With the $3.65M that Epic owes Apple, they just paid for Apple’s legal fees for the original lawsuit with enough left over to cover the appeal…
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhnd and WiseAJ
So just one count ruled against Apple ( which looks similar to the South Korean law)

but everything else is in apples favor. Ha ha. Suck it Epic. Especially Epics dream of an Open insecure iOS and its epic games store as well all gone. Sweeney must be crying now😂😂😂

P.S. in relation to this topic there is a anti Apple/pro epic games troll on Facebook by the name of Aurelio if anyone sees his posts on other apple fan pages on FB praising epic and hating Apple. Well I can’t wait for him to know that Apple largely won the case and he can stuff it

long live king apple.
 
I'm on the fence on this one.

One the one hand, I think Apple shouldn't be forced to let developers include links to outside payment/account setup options. Seems like Netflix has been just fine bypassing the App Store entirely. Developers have options, even if they might require customers to go through some hoops to use them.

On the other hand, I think it's probably a good/smart business decision for Apple to allow linking. If Apps/developers are already able to offer Apps for free (again, like Netflix) where users can sign up and pay completely outside the Apple ecosystem, I don't think a link built into the app changes a whole lot.

IMO.

I tend to agree. This is a way better middle ground outcome than being forced to allow other stores and side loading.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.