Android has equivalents of all of that. Don't see your point. The comparison seems fair.
Apple deniers in full force but as a dev he is right. The only time security becomes an issue with android is with custom roms kernels and radios.
iOS just can't be customized at all. Most stock roms on android are super secure, very similar to iOS.
iOS is designed primarily for the average non Savvy user but that's fine it's a good OS for day to day tasks.
you cant customize the OS at all and Apple continually works to destroy jailbreaks. You have got to be kidding me if you think this is a customizable OS.
tech savvy individuals generally go after a product that fits their needs then customize it to perfection.
Eric Schmidt is in his own Reality Distortion Feild![]()
Where do Android has faux metal, faux leather, faux stitching or faux wood?
Samsung Galaxy Note IIIWhere do Android has faux metal, faux leather, faux stitching or faux wood?
So here's something that might blow your mind...Just because I CHOOSE to use iPhone doesn't mean I don't have the ability to customize an Android phone. I keep going back to the iPhone because I don't WANT to customize it. Been there done that, it's boring, most of it doesn't save me any time and in fact, wastes it. I find Android to be less polished overall and "YAY!! I can root", doesn't tickle my fancy. (NOTE: have rooted multiple times..without bricking once!) So tech savvy has nothing to do with what you think it does.
Technically he's right.
Android is more secure because it has had to deal with security issues. There are more things beyond simply "buy from the store" for Android users. Google has taken security seriously. When you talk to people about their iDevices on here about an exploit... the response is usually "just buy from the store and you'll be fine".
iOS is an insecure system because it has one layer of defense. Android has multiple.
Again - you don't have to tweak or customize. The option is there. But it's not a requirement of either OS.
Do you really think other people can't read between the lines?Cool story bro
Its all optional
Samsung Galaxy Note III
Yes but I would argue that the ability to sideload is a welcome feature, not a flaw. But yes it relies on the users intelligence, which is dangerous.
Freedom is not without its pitfalls.
We'd all be safer under a iron fist dictator in real life (similar to apples approach), for example.
Technically he's right.
iOS is an insecure system because it has one layer of defense. Android has multiple.
And platform that permits ancient versions to exist can't by anyone's measure be remotely called 'secure'...
Exactly...
iPhones 'just work', out of the box. You charge it, turn it on, activate it, and it works. Your contact list doesn't disappear, the next app you download isn't going to trash your phone. You don't need 'protection' from nasty software. You don't have to buy the latest hardware to get the latest operating system... My iPhone 5 is working on iOS 7.
----------
But how many of those layers can be disabled by the user? How many can be gummed up and made useless? How many can be disabled or compromised by either a trojan horse app, or an app that doesn't run well?
Having a lifeguard at the app pool isn't a bad thing...
I have owned multiple Android phones, iPhones, windows phones, built PC's. I am the guy everyone I know calls when they have a computer problem. I am an RN, but when there is a computer problem and I'm working, I fix the problem most of the time before IT ever has to get called. Most of the time, it's because they lock me out of the system. Most of the time, I'm the one that has to talk to them because I'm the one that doesn't frustrate them. Now, I don't know how to write drivers or program, but I'm supposing you haven't narrowed your statement down to that since you haven't responded specifically to that.
So here's something that might blow your mind...Just because I CHOOSE to use iPhone doesn't mean I don't have the ability to customize an Android phone. I keep going back to the iPhone because I don't WANT to customize it. Been there done that, it's boring, most of it doesn't save me any time and in fact, wastes it. I find Android to be less polished overall and "YAY!! I can root", doesn't tickle my fancy. (NOTE: have rooted multiple times..without bricking once!) So tech savvy has nothing to do with what you think it does.
And I'll rebut your point above more simply. If a person found a phone that just "fit their needs", they wouldn't HAVE to customize it to perfection. That's the real point, and it has nothing to do with tech savvy-ness AT ALL.
P.S. Apples choices in closing jailbreaking loopholes has nothing to do with my ability as an individual.
Thats not to suggest non technical people aren't compelled to go towards Android either, just I think it has far more to do with personal preference and interests than it does on any technical merit (or the user plain doesn't care). Just because someone is technically capable it doesn't mean they want to tinker with their phones. Likewise I work in IT but I try and avoid being tech support for family or friends if I can because I find that aspect a drag.
I have a Sun server. I now have to have a support account, I can't download any updates for firmware, or anything without having a service contract. Seeing his smiling mug causes such interesting feelings of wanting to smack that smile off his face that I just have to drop it and hope like hell that Sun server doesn't need any support. We did buy a contract...
There you go.
Ah, this is Android?
Perhaps you're confusing just one device from a company with a whole operating system.
And I think you're also confused, Schmidt is not a Samsung boss.
Faux metal, faux leather, faux stitching, faux wood boxes, and now faux comments from their boss. What's next?
I guess you don't see the android on the back of the box?